Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.
When federal and state roads are built or improved, we consider the carriageway, ancillary facilities and utility works separately. FONTANA-EOD checks intervention geometry, survey conditions and construction phases. Send the improvement plan, chainage, side of the road and depths so that investigations and documentation can be defined for the individual road and utility sections.
Assign the side of the road and construction phase.
Separate areas, trenches and points.
Clearly update outstanding areas.
For federal and state roads, investigation requirements are checked against the planned earthworks, existing documents relating to suspected ordnance and previous results. Urban through-roads, roadside areas, utility sections and structures are considered separately by location, depth and traffic phase. Planning defines the investigation needed before each intervention and how outstanding subareas will be investigated further.
The scope of services for ‘Hückelhoven (Ratheim) – Hückelhoven (Millich) – L 117 n, Ratheim–Millich missing link, trough structure – project 752393 Hückelhoven (Ratheim) – Hückelhoven (Millich) / Deutschland · Köln administrative district’ included downhole magnetometry.
Service period: 2026-08
Service areas:Downhole magnetometry / deep-ground survey
View project details · Deep-ground and downhole surveys · Region: Köln administrative district
The scope of services for ‘Erftstadt (Konradsheim) – L 162 Erftstadt-Konradsheim – 071-26-1 Erftstadt (Konradsheim) / Deutschland · Köln administrative district’ included downhole magnetometry.
Service period: 2026-08
Service areas:Downhole magnetometry / deep-ground survey
View project details · Deep-ground and downhole surveys · Region: Köln administrative district
The scope of services for ‘L116 Grube Saturn – southern section Lägerdorf–Breitenburg, Grube Saturn / Deutschland’ included downhole magnetometry.
Service period: 2026-08
Service areas:Downhole magnetometry / deep-ground survey
Federal and state roads combine traffic space, utility construction, municipal interfaces and different construction stages. The technical division follows the actual groundworks, rather than a general road area.
On urban through-roads, property access points, temporary footways, stops, tree locations and private or municipal service connections are also considered. On open roads, slopes, swales, culverts and roadside cycle paths take greater prominence.
Joint projects involving road authorities, municipalities and utility operators require a coordinated data and handover standard. Each subproject is recorded by client, spatial extent, intervention depth and construction phase. This allows a common basis for suspicion to be used without improperly extending results to neighbouring utility areas or ancillary areas.

The carriageway, verges, slopes, drainage and roadside facilities are often renewed section by section. Working width and intervention depth vary between the road structure, formation level and ancillary areas.
Investigation is divided by chainage, side of the road, construction phase and accessible ground volume. Existing utilities and culverts remain clearly identified as separate constraints.
Have the open-road section investigated by a specialist
In urban areas, roadworks, municipal utilities, property service connections, footways, stops, access points and closely sequenced traffic phases interact.
The construction site, utility trenches, shafts, carriageway halves and private connections are recorded separately. Explosive ordnance investigation is coordinated with utility operators and construction sections.
For each traffic phase, the documentation states which side of the road, ancillary facility or connection zone was actually accessible, and which area can be investigated only after the next demolition step.
Assess the urban through-road
Crossroads, roundabouts and side-road junctions combine turning lanes, crossings, traffic signals, drainage and temporary works.
Each construction phase changes accessible areas and traffic movements. Investigation follows the actual subareas and deep localised groundworks.
Traffic-signal masts, lighting, drainage shafts and crossings receive their own point or line identifiers so that later relocations are not inferred from a general junction area.
Have the junction investigated by a specialist
Abutments, piers, culvert bases, excavations, shoring and foundations create distinct area and depth volumes.
Existing structures and water flow may limit access and the ability to survey. Near-surface areas and deep foundation points are documented separately.
Investigate the bridge and culvert area
Sewers, shafts, channels, culverts and stormwater facilities run along or across the road and often extend deep into the ground.
The alignment, width, depth, shaft locations and crossings form the investigation geometry. Dense utility networks are reviewed before method selection.
Where several utilities are installed together, the deepest level, excavation width and sequence of utility works form the basis for the required investigation volume.
Investigate drainage and the sewer route
Ancillary facilities are often outside previously investigated carriageway areas and have their own utilities, foundations, crossings and construction phases.
The ground volume of the works is delineated by use, depth and construction stage. Stops, lighting and fittings receive point-specific investigation volumes.
If an ancillary facility changes sides of the road during the project or is realigned section by section, the documentation is adapted to the actual execution geometry.
Assess ancillary facilities
Linear structures combine piles, anchors, masts and foundations with slope and ground works.
Alignment and point lists include target depths and installation methods. Relocations in the plans are checked against existing documentation before execution.
Investigate retaining and noise-protection structures
Buildings, property service connections, utilities, traffic areas or existing structures may limit complete preliminary investigation.
For remaining areas, the technical suitability of an explosive ordnance survey alongside construction is assessed. Technical surveying and assessment of each working layer are planned before its removal. Excavation layers, hold points, communication and section-specific documentation are defined before work begins.
Agree excavation supervisionPlanning, utility operator coordination, tendering and execution require different information. Explosive ordnance investigation is therefore directed towards the next specific decision.
For public clients, it is also important that everyone involved understands the tendered scope in the same way. Subareas, prior work, quantities, data formats and acceptance criteria are described so that technical differences do not become apparent only during execution.
Particularly in built-up sections, decisions often develop step by step: utility diversion first, then carriageway removal, followed by sewer or road construction. Explosive ordnance investigation is coordinated with this sequence so that each newly accessible area can be assessed by a specialist before the associated intervention.
Early planning requires spatial assessment of historical indications, known finds and existing statements.
The result supports comparison of options, land requirements and identification of construction sections requiring further technical investigation.
Clarify the suspected hazard earlyOn urban through-roads and built-up sections, existing conditions, diversions, property service connections, access points and construction phases must be considered together.
Investigation planning shows which areas can be surveyed in advance and which become accessible only after utilities or surfaces are removed. Necessary investigations and protective measures are defined for groundworks during demolition as well.
Check utility and construction phase plansThe service specification, area and depth reference, prior work, quality requirements and required documentation must be equally clear to all bidders.
Plan revisions and provisional items receive clear triggers.
Structure the tender documentsUnder suitable conditions, carriageway halves, footways, cycle paths, verges and utility alignments can be investigated by area or along a line.
The surface, soil, reinforcement, utilities and access determine the method’s suitability.
Choose surface methods for areas and linesShafts, piles, masts, shoring, and bridge or retaining-wall foundations require their own depth investigation.
Coordinates, geometry, target depth and construction method are documented for each component.
Prepare deep construction pointsExisting structures and traffic management may initially make subareas inaccessible. These areas are not automatically included in the assessment.
A suitable further investigation method and the construction stage required for it are defined for these areas. Necessary investigations and protective measures for groundworks during demolition are planned beforehand. An explosive ordnance survey alongside construction requires technical suitability for the planned intervention.
Plan remaining areas within the excavationThe specialist statement must identify which part of the road corridor was investigated at which construction stage. Only then can it be used reliably in planning, site management and utility coordination.
Initial situation: sufficiently location-specific information on suspected ordnance is unavailable for road improvement, rehabilitation or a bypass.
Investigation: historical sources are linked to chainage, the construction site and intended interventions.
Result: prioritised areas for technical investigation and documented data gaps.
Initial situation: utility services, property connections and earlier excavations strongly affect the carriageway, footway and ancillary areas.
Investigation: existing-condition plans, surface, construction phase and surveyability are assessed section by section.
Result: suitable preliminary investigation and clearly delineated remaining areas for later construction stages.
Initial situation: one carriageway half is being worked on while the opposite direction carries traffic or retains existing installations.
Investigation: investigation and handover boundaries are linked to the traffic phase, side of the road and subsequent changeover.
Result: subarea status without extending it to the side of the road not yet investigated.
Initial situation: a shaft, mast, pile, shoring structure or other structure extends deeper than the reliable scope of a surface survey.
Investigation: point-specific or alignment-specific deep-ground surveying follows the actual construction geometry.
Result: clear investigation status for the individual intervention.
Initial situation: survey data or field observations indicate an area requiring further clarification.
Investigation: location, depth, data quality, known installations and the basis for suspicion are assessed together.
Result: supplementary investigation, exposure, clearance, recovery or an adapted construction sequence.
Initial situation: the road, ancillary facilities and utilities are handed over to different trades at different times.
Investigation: investigation boundaries, outstanding points and plan revisions are checked for each subsection.
Result: traceable work status for site management, utility operators and subsequent trades.
For federal and state roads, road construction, ancillary facilities, utility operators and traffic phases must have access to the same spatial investigation status. The documentation therefore links chainage, side of the road, construction stage and specialist decision.
In joint projects, report recipients and handover points are defined before work begins. The road authority, municipality and individual utility operators may need different detailed documents; nevertheless, all outputs are based on the same investigated geometry and data revision.
Where traffic phases are divided, the report must identify which side of the road, ancillary facility or connection zone was actually investigated. Areas beneath traffic lanes still in use or utilities still in place remain identified separately. This prevents a partial report for the first construction phase from being used as documentation for later, deeper works.
Chainage, direction of travel, side of the road, construction section, working width and plan revision form the spatial reference.
Survey areas, utility alignments, shafts and deep points are assigned to the same structure.
Aerial photograph assessments, statements, earlier reports and known finds are documented with their spatial scope.
Different statements remain separate as sources that can be checked.
Utility services, property connections, drainage, structures and earlier excavations are considered by location and depth.
Information about existing conditions supports method selection and subsequent plausibility checks.
The survey system, grid, line layout, investigation depth, surface, ground, traffic and access are described for each construction phase.
This keeps the statement limited to the actual working conditions.
Inaccessible areas or areas whose data cannot be evaluated are shown spatially and linked to a later investigation time.
Changed depths or construction alignments are checked against the existing investigation scope before execution.
The report, plans, point lists, findings and outstanding measures are compiled for the respective section.
Site management and subsequent trades can identify which areas can be used and where further investigation remains necessary.
A reliable project file must remain understandable through changes to plan revisions, utility operators and construction phases. The dossier brings together the historical basis, field services and follow-up decision without losing the spatial reference.
The project file includes plan changes, utility coordination and handovers between road construction, utility operators and site management, as well as survey data and findings. This makes it possible to trace which information supported each decision and which subarea still requires supplementary investigation.
Site plans, road improvement cross-sections, utility alignments, shafts, structures, traffic phases and plan revisions are recorded with clear designations.
This keeps the investigation geometry traceable even when construction stages change.
Historical assessments, information from authorities and known finds are related to the specific road section and ancillary areas.
Unresolved data questions are recorded as tasks for planning or further research.
Survey lines, grids, equipment parameters, surface conditions, interruptions and quality checks are documented.
The documents show which subarea was surveyed under which conditions.
Known utilities, property connections, shafts and structures are compared spatially with measured anomalies.
Unclear areas receive an identifier and a defined follow-up measure.
Sides of the road, edges and construction sections not yet accessible are recorded with the reason, planned access and investigation step.
This keeps the transition between half-width construction phases manageable.
Partial reports, plans, registers and outstanding measures are handed over to road construction teams, utility operators and site management in the agreed form. Where exposure or clearance work has actually taken place, the corresponding findings and clearance records are included.
The conclusion remains limited to the section, construction phase and documented depth.
The process links historical clarification, technical investigation, utility coordination and traffic phases. Each work step provides a clear basis for the next construction decision.
Chainage, side of the road, urban or open-road setting, construction phases, interventions, depths, utilities and decision dates are described.
The current plan revision forms the starting basis.
Historical assessments, information from authorities, utility plans, ground data and earlier reports are compared spatially.
Missing or contradictory information is recorded as outstanding points.
The carriageway, footways and cycle paths, trenches, shafts, structures, point foundations and areas accessible later are planned separately.
Each area receives its own documentation objective.
The surface, ground, existing utilities, traffic, access and required depth determine the methodology.
Half-width construction methods and diversions are incorporated into the sequence.
Setting-out, access, protective measures, contacts, hold points and data handover are defined before work begins.
Utility operators and site management receive clear communication routes.
Geophysical surveys, depth investigations or a technically suitable explosive ordnance survey alongside construction are related to the work volume released for the assignment.
Deviations in location, depth or construction stage are documented immediately.
Survey data, anomalies, known installations, exposure work and limitations are checked for plausibility.
The next investigation step is defined for outstanding areas.
The report, site plan, point and anomaly registers, remaining areas and follow-up measures are prepared for subsequent trades.
New construction phases are checked against the existing investigation scope.
Federal and state roads combine linear traffic areas with smaller utility, adjoining-property and structural areas. A reliable tender must reflect these differences spatially and technically.
Technical planning starts with chainage, side of the road, improvement cross-section, working width and maximum depth. The carriageway, ancillary facilities, utility alignments, shafts, structures and point foundations are linked to these parameters.
For each subarea, the physical property to be investigated and whether the surface, ground, existing utilities and access permit a reliable survey are assessed. Dense utility networks and earlier excavations may significantly affect interpretation.
Deep shafts, piles, sheet piles, masts and boreholes receive their own point or alignment geometry. A statement from an area survey is not extended to these depth volumes without supporting documentation.
For half-width construction, the accessible areas are defined for each traffic phase. Areas beneath retained structures or installations are recorded as later investigation zones and remain identifiable separately from the general section statement.
The cost calculation is divided by area, line, point, depth, construction phase, setting-out, data format and report. This keeps the base scope and project-dependent additions transparent.
For urban through-roads, repeated site visits, short subsections, changing traffic conditions and coordination with utility operators are also considered. These constraints affect execution logistics without changing the technical requirements for surveying and documentation.
On urban through-roads, survey and excavation areas are often interrupted by property access points, bus stops, temporary footways or utility works carried out section by section. These interruptions are retained as separate area segments with access and investigation status. This allows later construction phases to address the outstanding areas specifically.
For shafts, masts, retaining walls and crossings, the subsequent component geometry is recorded separately. Point location, dimensions, target depth and installation method determine the volume to be investigated. If a location changes because of existing utilities or traffic management, the new geometry is not automatically covered by the earlier documentation.
Surfacing, reinforcement, installations, earlier excavations and remaining traffic affect survey conditions.
The investigation volume relates to the actual demolition or earthworks volume.
Ancillary areas often have their own utilities, lighting, stops, trees and property connections.
They are not automatically covered by a carriageway investigation.
Alignment, width, depth, shaft geometry, crossings and existing utilities determine the technical investigation.
Deep shafts and boreholes receive their own point reference.
Junctions and half-width construction alter the accessible area over the construction period.
Investigation boundaries and partial handovers are linked to the respective traffic phase.
Piles, shoring structures, anchors, abutments and deep foundations are recorded with coordinates, target depth and installation method.
Near-surface surveys do not replace investigation of this depth geometry.
Access points, private connections, ancillary municipal works and utility operators may alter the construction sequence.
Plan changes are related to the documented investigation volume.

Investigation requirements are clarified where rehabilitation, widening, a bypass, an urban through-road, sewer or utility construction, bridge works, a cycle path, stop or other civil engineering measure enters a ground volume that has not been sufficiently assessed. The specific construction section and working geometry are decisive, rather than classification as a federal or state road alone.
Determine investigation requirements by construction section
In urban settings, the carriageway, footways, property access points, utility services, drainage, lighting and stops are close together. Open-road sections also involve verges, slopes, culverts, cycle paths, retaining walls and structures. These subareas are considered separately by location, depth, construction phase and technical surveyability.
Half-width construction and changing traffic arrangements determine when a side of the road or ancillary area becomes accessible. Uninvestigated areas remain clearly identified and are assigned to a later construction stage. This enables reliable partial handovers without extending documentation to areas not investigated.
Choose methods for areas and construction stagesThe road corridor contains area-wide, linear and localised interventions. The right combination follows from the project question and the actual planned ground volume.
Assesses whether historically founded suspicion of explosive ordnance exists and in which subareas.
It does not state which objects are actually present in the ground today.
Investigates suitable carriageway or ancillary areas using a geophysical method appropriate to the project question.
Utilities, reinforcement, traffic and structures may limit surveyability.
Relates cable, sewer or drainage alignments to working width, depth and crossing areas.
Shafts and separate deep points are considered additionally.
Investigates defined point locations and depth volumes for piles, masts, shoring, boreholes or deep shafts.
The documented statement applies only to the defined investigation geometry.
In a technically suitable explosive ordnance survey alongside construction, each working layer is surveyed using technical equipment and assessed. Controlled removal in layers and supplementary visual inspection follow; these steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base. Simply watching excavation is insufficient.
Excavation layers, hold points and the ground volume to be documented are defined before work begins. The statement remains limited to the area actually investigated.
Exposure, clearance or recovery are documented as separate activities; the final report describes the investigation stage and remaining limitations.
Uninvestigated areas or areas changed later remain outside the statement.
Magnetometry detects magnetic anomalies, particularly those caused by ferromagnetic objects. Suitable unobstructed route corridors and ancillary areas may provide a location-specific basis for anomaly assessment. Protective systems, reinforcement, foundations, vehicles and other iron masses may obscure signals. Survey areas and interference zones are documented separately.
TDEM detects time-dependent electromagnetic responses from conductive objects and may provide supplementary investigation of selected areas or anomalies. Utilities, reinforcement and other technical installations affect evaluation. Target size, depth and survey geometry limit interpretation; a survey signal does not identify an object.
Ground-penetrating radar shows reflections at material and structural boundaries and may provide supplementary representations of layers, installations and changes in the ground. Ground conductivity, moisture and heterogeneous fill affect data depth and interpretation. Radargrams and site plans show structures and outstanding areas; a reflection does not identify explosive ordnance.
A usable explosive ordnance investigation combines clear geometries, realistic survey conditions, coordinated interfaces and a project file that can be updated.
FONTANA-EOD aligns the work with the actual construction task. The carriageway, utility trench, shaft, footway, structure and foundation are not treated as equivalent areas.
Before fieldwork, the plan revision, side of the road, traffic phase, existing utilities, surface, ground and required depth are checked. This establishes a technically justified scope of services.
During execution, inaccessible areas, plan changes, additional points and differing construction stages are updated continuously. The conclusion remains limited to the documented investigation scope.
For anomalies, survey observations, known technical causes and actual find situations are distinguished. The next measure is communicated with its location and depth reference.
For partial handovers, road construction teams, utility companies and site management receive the same data revision. Outstanding edges and later construction phases remain clearly identifiable.
In a road corridor, quality assurance also means making discrepancies between existing-condition plans and actual field conditions clear. An unplanned utility, a shaft that differs from the plan or an inaccessible subarea is communicated as project information rather than obscured by a general conclusion.
Chainage, side of the road, construction phase and depth are defined before work begins.
Existing utilities, property connections, shafts and crossings are included in planning and assessment.
The method and supplementary measures depend on the target object, surface, ground and interference conditions.
Plan revisions and additional interventions are checked against the investigation volume before execution.
Inaccessible areas or areas whose data cannot be evaluated are shown spatially.
The report and plans answer the project question for the respective subsection.
The documentation links chainage, side of the road, construction section, traffic phase, area investigated, depth, method, limitations and the specialist follow-up decision. This allows the status to be incorporated traceably into the specification, site management, utility coordination and project file.
In joint projects, roadworks and utility alterations do not necessarily take place at the same time. Explosive ordnance investigation is therefore divided so that an early utility section, later carriageway removal and additional property connections can each be related to the current investigation stage.
On urban through-roads, explosive ordnance investigation is closely linked to coordination between utilities. Existing utilities, property connections, shafts and planned diversions affect surveyability and the sequence of construction sections. Technical investigation volumes and construction work volumes are therefore reconciled before traffic phase planning.
Outside built-up areas, long roadside areas, slopes, swales, culverts and roadside cycle paths take prominence. A general statement for the entire corridor is also insufficient there if structures, crossings or deep mast and shoring points create different investigation geometries.
For federal and state roads, road responsibilities, utility operators, municipal interests, private specialist services and regional hazard prevention interact. Clear allocation of roles prevents gaps between planning and execution.
Define the construction task, investigation volume, plan revision, required statement and timing priorities. They compile planning and existing-condition documents and commission the specialist services needed for each subsection.
For joint projects, they coordinate the overarching data and handover structure.
Translates the project into road improvement cross-sections, subareas, utility alignments, shafts, structures, foundations and traffic phases.
Changes are communicated so that their impact on existing documentation can be assessed.
Provide existing-condition and diversion data and coordinate their interventions with roadworks and explosive ordnance investigation.
Property connections, crossings and additional depths are recorded in the common plan revision.
Implement work areas, construction phases, excavation layers, protective measures and reporting routes.
Deviations in location, depth or construction method are reported before the groundworks concerned.
Assesses the basis for suspicion and intervention geometry, carries out the commissioned specialist services and documents results and statement limitations.
The private specialist service is coordinated with the client, planners, site management and regional interfaces.
In Germany, the ordnance disposal services of the federal states and the locally competent authorities carry out hazard-response and find-management duties. Their involvement is established for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.
The specific involvement follows the locally defined reporting route.
Public-order and building-control authorities may be involved depending on the local procedure and construction task. Requirements and contacts are assigned to the actual road section and plan revision. Technical investigation, traffic orders and official decisions on finds are documented with their respective responsibilities.
Qualifications, risk assessment, traffic and work organisation, interfaces and documentation depend on the activity, project location and construction stage. A general road classification does not replace this project-specific assessment.
In Germany, § 7 SprengG concerns the commercial authorisation for activities requiring authorisation; § 20 SprengG concerns the certificate of competence of responsible persons. Under § 1b SprengG, searching for found munitions also counts as handling them. The requirements applicable to the project depend on the activity actually commissioned and the allocation of responsibilities.
The risk assessment brings together traffic, excavations, machinery, utilities, personnel, protective zones, escape routes and communication. Half-width traffic arrangements or work in urban areas are coordinated with the specialist technical process.
DGUV Information 201-027 addresses hazards and protective measures during explosive ordnance clearance. The Baufachliche Richtlinien Kampfmittelräumung contain requirements for investigation, planning, execution, quality and documentation within their defined federal scope. Their application and the contractual requirements are clarified for the specific road construction project.
If an unexpected suspicious object is encountered, work in the affected area stops immediately. Do not touch or move it or expose it further. Leave the immediate area and warn others without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting route. Site management and those responsible for the project are then informed.
The First Ordinance to the Explosives Act (1. SprengV) includes requirements for specialist knowledge and state-recognised training courses. For federal and state roads, the required qualifications are related to the specific activities and ground volumes commissioned.
DGUV Rule 113-003 concerns the dismantling or destruction of explosives or corresponding objects and also includes the disposal of found munitions. It applies according to this field of activity; it does not replace a risk assessment specific to the planned ground intervention.
Areas, depths, objective, methods, prior work, quality and required documentation are clearly described.
Traffic, construction stage, utilities, earthworks, personnel and communication are considered together.
The company, responsible persons, competence and scope of duties must match the specific activity.
Investigation status, findings, remaining areas and the follow-up decision are updated traceably.
Plan revisions, utility data, traffic phases, work areas and contacts are reconciled.
Deviations, additional interventions and inaccessible areas are reported promptly.
Stop work, leave the immediate area and notify the responsible authorities without delay. The responsible authorities arrange further measures.
The documentation must reflect the detailed division between carriageway, ancillary facilities, utilities and construction phases. Partial reports can be reused reliably only with a clear spatial and plan-revision reference.

Links the side of the road, construction phase, carriageway, footways and cycle paths, utility alignments, shafts and structures.
Investigated and outstanding areas remain clearly identified throughout the project.
Document chainage and subareas
Relates the available sources, suspected sections and data gaps to the present geometry of the road and ancillary areas.
It establishes the basis for technical follow-up planning.
Assess areas of historical suspicion
Brings known utilities, property connections, survey lines, grids and interference zones together in a common spatial reference.
Deviations between existing-condition records and field observations remain traceable.
Document utility and survey data with a spatial reference
Documents coordinates, component, target depth, investigation geometry, limitations and specialist status.
Relocated or additional points are updated specifically.
Investigate shafts and deep points
Shows which side of the road or ancillary area was investigated in each traffic phase.
Areas accessible later receive a planned investigation step.
Document construction phases and outstanding areas
Summarises the initial situation, area investigated, methods, findings, limitations and next measures.
Road construction teams, utility companies and site management receive the same investigation status.
Combine partial reports and handovers

For federal and state roads, historical assessment, necessary surveys and supervision of earthworks must be coordinated with the respective construction sections. Investigation results and any necessary recovery work must be documented traceably.
Plan road and civil engineering projects by route section, structure and intervention depth.
Classify the road and civil engineering project
Project settings outside road construction can be selected by infrastructure type, use and organisational interfaces.
Assess another project setting
Explore the basis for suspicion, sources, road section and need for technical investigation.
Clarify historical suspicion indicators
Relate shafts, piles, masts, shoring and borehole points to the actual intervention geometry.
Investigate deep construction points
Assess the suitability of an explosive ordnance survey alongside construction for remaining road and utility work areas.
Plan excavation supervision in the road section
Coordinate recovery of confirmed ordnance with the permitted activities and local responsibilities.
Coordinate findings and handover
Structure the service specification, quality control, partial reports and project handover.
Agree tendering and documentation
Assess the project location, federal state and local interfaces for procedures and communication of finds.
Check regional responsibilities
Identify the road, chainage, side of the road and associated ancillary areas on the site plan. Assign property access points, stops and utility sections to the respective construction phase. Where traffic arrangements change, it must remain clear which side and stage an investigation result relates to.
A utility section investigated in advance covers subsequent carriageway removal only insofar as its actual work volume was investigated. Therefore, compare the planned widths, depths and construction stages with the existing report.
Trace section boundariesExisting correspondence and conditions should be held in the project file with their dates, senders and spatial reference. A requirement for one section must not be extended to the entire road or another construction project without checking.
Assess project-specific informationTechnical information
How can carriageways, bridges and deep excavations be investigated for ordnance? The brochure explains preparation, suitable survey methods and supervision of earthworks.

Specialist assessment should begin as soon as rehabilitation, widening, bypass construction, an urban through-road, utility construction, drainage, bridge works, a junction or cycle path enters a ground volume that has not yet been reliably assessed. Road classification and length alone are not decisive; the construction section, working width, depth, existing utilities, traffic phase and required statement matter. Early assessment helps with tendering, coordination with utility operators and the construction sequence.
The carriageway, footways and cycle paths, verges, slopes, utility trenches, drainage, bus stops, junctions, bridges, retaining walls, noise barriers, lighting and site establishment areas have different widths and depths. A near-surface carriageway investigation does not automatically address deep shaft, pile, shoring or mast points. Each ground volume therefore receives its own location and depth reference.
For each traffic and construction phase, the accessible area, utilities or existing installations that will remain, and next earthworks step are defined. Surveying, data checking and handover are timed accordingly. Areas accessible only later remain documented as outstanding zones. This allows work on one side of the road to continue without improperly extending statements to the opposite direction or subsequent construction phases.
The method depends on the suspected hazard, target object, surface, ground, utility density and depth. Magnetometry, TDEM and ground-penetrating radar respond to different physical properties. Deep shafts, piles, sheet piles, masts or boreholes are assessed for the required point-specific and depth-specific investigation scope. A suitable further method is defined for areas that cannot be adequately surveyed in advance. In a technically suitable explosive ordnance survey alongside construction, each layer is surveyed using technical equipment and assessed. Controlled removal in layers and supplementary visual inspection follow; these steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base. Simply watching excavation is insufficient.
Useful documents include site and road improvement plans, chainage, construction section and traffic phase plans, cross-sections, utility and existing-condition plans, drainage, borehole and foundation point lists, historical assessments, correspondence with authorities, ground investigation documents and existing survey reports. For urban through-roads, access points, stops, footways, cycle paths, private connections and ancillary municipal works should be identifiable.
Information and requirements from authorities are supplied with their date, complete appendices and geographical scope. In Germany, the competent ordnance disposal service, local public-order authority and, where relevant, building-control authority are established for the project location. Outside Germany, the locally competent bodies are identified through coordination.
In Germany, responsibility for road construction and maintenance, planning, and local traffic and hazard prevention matters is clarified for the project location and circumstances. The authorities responsible make their respective procedural decisions. FONTANA-EOD provides the agreed private specialist service and prepares spatial and technical information for the client, planners and site management. Reporting and coordination routes are defined before work begins; outside Germany, the responsibilities applicable there apply.
If an unexpected suspicious object is found, stop work. Do not touch, move or uncover it further. Leave the immediate area and warn others without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting procedure. The competent authorities determine what happens next; a project enquiry does not replace reporting the find.
Factors include section length, road cross-section, urban or open-road setting, number of traffic phases, existing utilities and structures, surfaces, access, number and depth of localised interventions, methods required, setting-out and documentation scope, and possible follow-up measures. For a reliable cost calculation, quantities are divided by subarea, line, point and construction phase rather than based solely on road length.
An initial enquiry should identify the spatial section, construction phases, planned groundworks and existing basis for suspicion. Incomplete documents are also relevant if the plan revision and unresolved assumptions are identified.
Where several utility operators are involved, documents should be submitted organised by utility owner, construction phase and spatial section. This helps distinguish information that can be used jointly from investigations applying exclusively to a specific utility, shaft or side of the road.
Provide the site and road improvement plans, chainage, side of the road, construction sections, traffic phases and current plan designation.
The carriageway, footways and cycle paths, stops, junctions, structures and ancillary areas should be identifiable.
Describe demolition, excavation, sewer and utility trenches, shafts, crossings, piles, shoring, masts and maximum depths.
Utility plans, property connections and planned diversions affect the methodology.
Include historical assessments, official correspondence, ground data and existing survey reports.
State construction dates, closure or traffic phases and the date by which a decision is needed for planning, tendering or execution.
A site plan, chainage, side of the road, construction sections, maximum depths, utility overview and existing indications of suspected ordnance are often sufficient for an initial review. FONTANA-EOD then identifies the data still required and the appropriate scope of services.
For urban through-roads or joint projects, investigation may be divided by roadworks, utilities, ancillary facilities and construction phases. This keeps every specialist statement assigned to its actual ground volume.
A complete enquiry should also identify the responsible design consultancies, utility operators, planned tender packages and required data formats. This allows early clarification of whether a joint report or several subproject-specific handovers are required.
Chainage, side of the road, construction section, ancillary area and plan revision.
Excavation, trench, shaft, pile, shoring, mast and maximum depth.
Traffic phase, access to adjoining properties, utility operators, parallel trades and dates.
Basis for planning, tendering, site management, partial handover or the project file.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.