Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.
For service area extensions, we consider parking spaces, aisles, drainage and equipment foundations together with the planned groundworks. FONTANA-EOD plans suitable investigations according to working volume, intervention depth and access during individual construction phases. Send the extension drawing, depths, traffic phases and existing documents on suspected ordnance so that services and documentation can be specified before the relevant groundworks.
Distinguish aisles, parking spaces and ancillary installations.
Assign excavation, utilities and foundations.
Clearly document the sections investigated.
Before a service area is built, extended or refurbished, investigation requirements are established using existing indications of suspected ordnance and planned ground interventions. Parking spaces, aisles, drainage, utilities and foundations are distinguished by location, depth and construction phase. Technical installations and paved surfaces affect when an area can be investigated and which method is suitable. Documentation identifies the subareas investigated, depths reached and outstanding tasks for designers and site management.
The scope of services for “Construction of a car park Not specified / Germany” comprised ground-penetrating radar.
Service period: 2026-04
Service areas:Surface surveys: GPR, TDEM and magnetometryMethod used in this project: Ground-penetrating radar
The scope of services for “Imst – B189, bypass at the Auf Arzill roundabout and coach park Imst / Austria” comprised ground-penetrating radar.
Service period: 2025-12
Service areas:Surface surveys: GPR, TDEM and magnetometryMethod used in this project: Ground-penetrating radar
The scope of services for “Car park, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia” comprised ordnance specialist supervision.
Service period: –
Service areas:Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworks
Service areas and car parks comprise traffic, building, utility and equipment zones with different depths and interference conditions. Specialist work therefore follows the planned use of each subarea.
For sites remaining in operation, construction sections, access routes, closed areas and handovers are considered so that new earthworks do not begin outside the documented investigation volume.

Extensions to parking bays, aisles and waiting areas affect large areas that are often paved or already affected by previous use.
The sub-base, frost-protection layer, drainage channels, marking and safety installations determine the area and depth volume actually affected by the work.
Area measurements, point-specific investigations and construction-stage measures are combined so that each subsequent construction service has its own spatial documentation.
Obtain specialist assessment of traffic areas
Building foundations, utility connections, chambers and excavations extend substantially deeper than simple surface renewal.
The building footprint, foundation type, excavation base and utility connections are treated as separate investigation geometries.
A technical preliminary investigation of an open area does not automatically address the deeper working volume of piles, ground slabs, chambers or excavation shoring.
Investigate foundation and drilling points
Sewers, channels, sedimentation installations, separators, basins and infiltration swales form a linear and point-specific civil engineering system.
Base levels, chambers, utility alignments and excavations are assigned chainage references and compared with existing service lines and the subsequent excavation sequence.
With varying depths and phased construction, documentation remains linked to chamber, pipe-section and construction-section identifiers.
Assess the drainage structure
Masts, sign gantries, sensors and telematic parking systems require individual foundations and cable connections.
Each location receives coordinates, target depth, foundation dimensions and an installation method; conclusions for relocated points are not inferred from general area documentation.
Existing metal installations may limit area-survey methods; for new points, it is then assessed which method and access adequately cover the planned intervention.
Prepare mast and equipment points
Charging points, transformer stations, cable routes and battery storage link equipment areas with trenches, foundations and installation zones.
Explosive ordnance investigation is organised by cable corridor, station foundation and equipment footprint and coordinated with the energy project.
Station foundations, cable routes and required connection works are checked against the current electrical and civil engineering drawings.
Investigate charging and energy areas
Existing installations are often altered in phases while parts of the service area must remain available for traffic and operation.
Demolition stages, inaccessible zones, intermediate areas and handovers are agreed with site management and traffic management before work starts.
Investigation status is updated for each construction phase so that earthworks at different times do not rely on outdated conclusions about areas or depths.
Document construction phases and updated investigation statusOptions appraisal, tendering and construction require different information. Early area assessment, tender-ready service specifications and construction-specific investigation need different levels of precision.
Before the extension area is selected, it should be established what historical indications and existing documents are available for the overall site.
Existing evidence is compared on the drawing with alternatives, access routes, structures and possible compensatory or drainage areas.
Early assessment improves options appraisal and scheduling without pre-empting the technical investigation needed later.
Assess suspected ordnance at the site spatiallyAisles, parking spaces, buildings, basins, utilities and equipment locations are translated into specific ground interventions.
Outstanding data gaps and existing areas that cannot be surveyed are identified as planning tasks before quantities and construction periods are specified.
Each design change is checked against the previous investigation volume; new structures or depths receive supplementary assessment.
Have the design stage assessed by specialistsAreas, depths, methods, preparatory services, access, traffic phases and documentation required under the contract must be described consistently for all tenderers.
Without spatial boundaries, it remains unclear which areas and depths tenders include.
Acceptance and handover criteria describe the documented stage of investigation, rather than a blanket conclusion about the whole property.
Specify the service scope and documentationGround investigations, masts, signs, piles, chambers and station foundations require investigation of the subsequent depth volume.
Coordinates, target depths, diameters and installation methods form the basis for point-specific work.
A general report about the surface is insufficient if the subsequent working volume lies deeper or laterally outside the survey geometry.
Investigate deep points and boreholesBeneath existing surfacing, buildings or technical installations, parts of the ground become accessible only during demolition.
For these sections, the exposed condition, excavation layers, equipment use, hold points and reporting procedures are specified before construction. Necessary investigations and protective measures are planned before ground disturbance during breaking out, demolition or creating access.
Whether explosive ordnance detection during construction is suitable for these areas is assessed by specialists. It includes technical investigations and does not replace clarification of responsibilities.
Prepare demolition and excavationA survey anomaly, a technical interference source and a suspicious object must be distinguished technically and organisationally.
The affected area is addressed at its specific location; the next measure depends on the finding, responsibility and construction sequence.
Communication of finds, site protection and the specialist subsequent decision are documented separately and handed over to the responsible bodies.
Clarify the findings and handover processThe same service area may include open extension areas, existing zones with strong interference and individual deep foundations. Each area needs its own specialist conclusion and an appropriate subsequent decision.
Initial situation: Insufficient spatial information on suspected explosive ordnance is available for the site.
Next step: Historical sources and existing authority documents are related to the property, construction sections and proposed extension.
Documentation objective: The corridor of suspected ordnance, data situation and subsequent technical investigation are clearly distinguished for further planning.
Establish the historical basisInitial situation: Green or open areas are to be developed into aisles, parking spaces or drainage zones.
Next step: Surface, ground, target object and required depth determine the suitable area-survey method.
Documentation objective: Survey coverage, interference zones and limits of conclusions remain linked to the subsequent subarea and excavation depth.
Select area-survey methodsInitial situation: Asphalt, concrete, utilities, reinforcement and technical installations affect survey feasibility.
Next step: Interference sources and achievable data depth are assessed; subareas may receive different methods or combinations of methods.
Documentation objective: The report identifies zones that can be evaluated and zones that cannot be evaluated reliably, instead of forcing a uniform conclusion about the whole area.
Have the existing area assessed by specialistsInitial situation: A mast, structure, chamber or pile extends below the reliably investigated near-surface zone.
Next step: The point-specific depth volume is investigated according to location, target depth, diameter and installation method.
Documentation objective: Point identifiers and depth information can be transferred directly to borehole, mast or structural schedules.
Investigate the depth volume for the specific projectInitial situation: Existing surfacing, buildings or installations prevent adequate investigation before demolition.
Next step: Suitable supplementary methods and possible access dates are established. Explosive ordnance detection during construction is an option only where technically suitable for the planned excavation.
Documentation objective: Excavation layers investigated under specialist supervision and excluded areas are recorded traceably for site management and subsequent trades.
Specify the construction stage and specialist supervisionInitial situation: An anomaly or observation requires further specialist clarification.
Next step: Survey anomalies are evaluated by specialists. If an unexpected suspicious object is encountered, work is stopped immediately and the responsible authorities are notified without delay.
Documentation objective: Findings, work and remaining action requirements are updated with clear spatial references in the project file.
Determine the subsequent measureThe report records which initial data were used, which areas were investigated and what findings or limitations were established. For phased extensions, this assignment must be maintained throughout construction.
The site plan, land parcels, construction sections, traffic areas, buildings, utilities and equipment locations form the spatial reference.
The drawing revision, coordinate system and unique identifiers are used consistently in the report and field documents.
This allows site management to identify which areas have already been investigated and which remain unresolved, even when contractors change.
Historical assessments, authority correspondence, older reports and known finds are documented with dates and scope.
Contradictions or missing attachments remain visible as unresolved items and are not replaced by a blanket conclusion.
Source assessment remains separate from technical measurements and actual finds so that different conclusions are not conflated.
The survey system, grid, survey-line layout, investigation depth, surface, ground, accessibility and interference sources are described for each subarea.
For drilling and excavation, point geometry, casing, excavation layer and construction equipment are added.
Acquisition conditions form part of the conclusion because asphalt surfaces and technical installations affect methods differently.
Survey lines, anomalies, borehole points, exposures and field observations receive unique identifiers.
Raw data, evaluation, drawings and findings logs must describe the same objects and work boundaries.
A consistent register facilitates quantity tracking, variation checks and handover of subareas to subsequent trades.
Inaccessible areas, areas affected by technical interference and those beyond the investigation depth are identified spatially.
For each limitation, the follow-up measure required before subsequent ground intervention is recorded.
Unresolved areas are assigned a specific spatial and technical task for the next construction stage, rather than an undefined reservation.
The report describes the investigation stage reached for the specific construction section and proposed use.
Design changes, additional depths and later construction phases are checked against that status and updated where necessary.
The conclusion is not extended beyond the investigated geometry and remains verifiable for later project changes.
The project file assigns historical documents, survey data and excavation logs to the same subareas and construction sections.
Project drawings, historical documents, authority conditions, utility data and earlier reports are maintained with their version and scope.
This keeps the decision-making basis available at the time of planning identifiable.
An attachment register facilitates complete handover to procurement, site management and the subsequent operator organisation.
Aisles, parking spaces, buildings, utility volumes and equipment areas receive their own identifiers.
Status is updated through planning, preliminary investigation, construction and handover.
The overview shows which subareas have been investigated and which adjoining areas remain unresolved.
Survey lines, grids, borehole points and excavation sections are linked through coordinates and drawing references.
Relocated or additional points receive a newly documented investigation status.
The spatial reference is particularly important for long utility routes and numerous individual equipment points.
Anomalies are recorded with their location, data basis, evaluation and next measure.
Known installations, technical interference sources and actual finds remain technically distinguishable.
For unresolved items, responsibility, date and required specialist service are documented.
Working conditions, interruptions, exposures, excavation layers and subarea handovers are recorded with dates. After actual exposure or clearance work, the corresponding findings and clearance records are included.
Communication with site management and responsible authorities remains traceable throughout the project.
When changes occur, it remains clear which construction stage was observed and which area was actually investigated.
The report, maps and outstanding measures are brought together into a clear status for each construction section.
Later extensions can thus build specifically on the existing data basis.
The project file can be used as a basis for acceptance, variations and later maintenance.
The sequence is adapted to project phase, traffic management and accessibility. Investigation, evaluation and handover of results are scheduled before each construction section.
Existing conditions, proposed extension, construction phases, ground interventions, depths and decision dates are taken from the current drawings.
It is established whether an overall assessment or prioritised work on individual construction sections is needed.
Historical assessments, authority documents, utility drawings, ground investigation data and earlier reports are checked for spatial consistency.
Missing attachments are not silently replaced but identified as specific procurement or clarification tasks.
Historical indications are related to aisles, parking spaces, buildings, drainage and equipment locations.
The assessment distinguishes general property information from the intervention geometry actually affected.
Area-survey methods, deep investigation, demolition stages and excavation supervision are selected for each working volume.
Method selection considers the target object, intervention depth, ground and technical interference.
Access, traffic phases, surveying, equipment, protection zones, hold points and data routes are agreed.
Short closure or construction windows are prepared organisationally without shortening necessary quality and documentation steps.
Measurements, necessary deep investigations or construction-stage investigations are carried out for specific locations and sections. Methods and actual survey coverage are documented.
Deviations from the survey or excavation plan are documented promptly and their technical effects assessed.
Measurements, anomalies, exposures and limitations are checked for plausibility against the basis for suspicion and construction geometry.
Areas that cannot be conclusively assessed receive a clear subsequent decision rather than a blanket negative conclusion.
Reports, maps, outstanding measures and work boundaries are prepared for procurement, site management and the project file.
Later design changes are checked against the documented area and depth status, with supplementary work where needed.
A service area has no uniform investigation geometry. Large areas, linear utilities, deep chambers and numerous individual foundations must be maintained separately yet consistently in the same project plan.
The starting point is not the whole property but the geometry of the planned construction service. For aisles and parking spaces, the area boundary, removal, new pavement construction and edge areas are described. Drainage lines receive alignments, chainage, chambers and base levels. Buildings, masts, signs, transformer stations and charging points are recorded by coordinates, foundation dimensions and depths.
Existing areas may be strongly affected by utilities, lighting, safety installations, reinforcement and earlier alterations. These installations influence survey data and accessibility. Open extension areas are therefore not automatically investigated using the same methods and quality assumptions as asphalt or technically occupied zones.
Documentation links each investigation volume to the subsequent construction stage. If an aisle is relocated, a basin enlarged or a mast location added, it can immediately be checked whether existing documentation remains usable or additional work is required.
Aisles, parking bays, pedestrian areas and green strips receive separate area identifiers and depths.
Transitions between existing areas and extensions are clearly marked on survey and construction drawings.
Excavation edges and temporary working areas are included where ground disturbance or load transfer also takes place there.
Pipe sections, channels, basins and separators are described by alignment, chainage and base level.
Chamber excavations and deep structures may require supplementary point-specific investigation.
Changing depths within a pipe section must not be concealed by a single blanket investigation depth.
Sanitary buildings, canopies, transformer stations and charging infrastructure have their own excavations or foundation points.
Area measurements are compared with the deeper foundation volumes.
Assembly areas and cable connections are considered together with foundations because they entail their own earthworks.
Individual points are recorded with coordinates, foundation dimensions, target depth and installation method.
Groups of masts receive a point register that also makes changes and replacement locations traceable.
A point applies only to the documented location and depth; relocations are reassessed before installation.
Utilities, earthing systems, reinforcement, safety barriers and vehicles can affect survey methods.
Known interference sources are mapped and considered in method selection and evaluation.
Zones that cannot be evaluated reliably are identified spatially and assigned an alternative measure.
Subareas are planned in the order of their actual accessibility and use.
When traffic management changes, it is checked whether additional ground interventions or altered access to investigation areas result.
Investigation status is linked to the construction programme without conflating specialist conclusions and programme authorisation.

Parking spaces, aisles and new edge areas are compared with historical evidence and earlier investigations. Temporary access routes and additional drainage areas are also included where ground interventions are proposed.
Assign existing documents to the extension area
Lighting, charging installations, canopies, chambers and retention systems may extend deeper than other area-based works. For these interventions, location and dimensions are stated individually and compared with achievable investigation volumes.
Assess depth-related investigationThe methods measure different properties and have their own ranges. They are combined according to suspected ordnance, ground, surface, interference conditions and intervention geometry.
Assesses whether and in which subareas historically substantiated suspected ordnance exists.
It does not detect objects actually present today.
Historical assessment prioritises technical investigation areas but does not replace field measurements or exposure.
Detects ferromagnetic anomalies in suitable areas with sufficiently low interference.
Metal installations and vehicles may limit conclusions in existing areas.
Open extension areas and existing zones with strong interference may require different methods.
Records time-dependent electromagnetic responses from conductive objects.
The target object, ground and technical infrastructure determine suitability.
The active measurement principle is not a blanket substitute for magnetometry or radar; it answers a different physical question.
Shows reflections at material and structural boundaries and can supplement investigation of paved areas under suitable conditions.
A radar reflection may have various structural or geological causes and is therefore checked for technical plausibility against the site plan, neighbouring profiles and project question.
Data depth and resolution are compared with the planned ground intervention before deployment.
Investigates defined point-specific and depth volumes for masts, piles, chambers or ground investigation boreholes.
The conclusion applies only to the specified geometry and target depth.
Groups of foundation points are planned and documented through a unique point register.
In a technically suitable explosive ordnance survey alongside construction, each working layer is surveyed using technical equipment and assessed. Controlled removal in layers and supplementary visual inspection then follow; these steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base. Simply watching excavation is insufficient.
Excavation layers, hold points, authority to issue instructions, communication routes and documentation are defined in the work instructions before work begins.
Areas not investigated under supervision, deeper layers and later changes remain outside the conclusion.
Subareas, suitable methods and required documentation are specified before work starts. The report shows what was investigated and which questions remain unresolved for the next works.
FONTANA-EOD divides the service area by actual construction tasks. An open extension area, drainage trench, building foundation and illuminated existing car park are not combined into a blanket area service. For each area, the survey objective, depth reference, accessibility and expected interference sources are specified.
During construction, design changes, relocated equipment points and newly accessible demolition areas are checked against existing investigation status. Documentation thus remains usable across several work packages, traffic phases and construction sections carried out at different times.
Survey anomalies are communicated with precise locations and compared with known technical installations. Unresolved interference sources receive further specialist investigation. If an unexpected suspicious object is encountered, work is stopped immediately and the responsible authorities are notified without delay; internal coordination must not delay notification.
The subarea, ground intervention, depth and information required are described before fieldwork.
This prevents a generally worded item from being interpreted differently for different construction services.
Surface, ground, target object and interference conditions determine the method.
Known technical limitations are considered in advance. Additional limitations encountered during fieldwork are documented and assessed by specialists.
Fieldwork follows construction phases, accessibility and documented boundaries.
Handovers between construction sections receive a traceable data revision and status.
Survey lines, points, findings and limitations remain spatially assigned.
Quality assurance can thus be traced back to specific areas, depths and identifiers.
Deviations and anomalies are passed to designated contacts.
Even with short decision routes, it remains clear who provides specialist assessment and who controls the construction sequence.
The report answers the project question and identifies measures still needed.
Broader wording is not used to include uninvestigated areas within the investigation status.
Before work starts, it is established which areas are closed, cleared or accessible only after demolition. Investigations and evaluation are assigned to the relevant construction sections. Areas not yet accessible remain identifiable as outstanding tasks in the sequence.
The section drawing, documented depth and current construction drawing are handed over together. Results for a parking area apply only within the coverage recorded; new utility trenches or deeper foundations require a separate comparison.
Road administrations, designers, operators, contractors, specialist companies and responsible authorities perform different tasks. Before work starts, it is specified who obtains missing documents, communicates design changes and decides on subsequent work.
Defines the project objective, construction sections, information required and timing priorities.
Provides existing documents and commissions the necessary specialist services.
Where several funding or construction sections are involved, it is specified who updates the overall investigation status.
Translate aisles, parking spaces, utilities, buildings and equipment points into specific ground interventions.
Incorporate explosive ordnance investigation into design, tendering and scheduling.
Design changes are marked so that their effect on previously investigated areas can be assessed.
Manage access, closures, operational areas and traffic arrangements during the works.
Report operational changes affecting the proposed working volume or accessibility.
Operational reopening and specialist investigation status are managed as separate decisions.
Implement working areas, instructions, excavation layers and hold points.
Communicate changes to location, depth and construction method before ground intervention.
The actual construction stage must match the documented investigation area.
Assesses suspected ordnance and project documents, plans the commissioned approach and carries out the specialist service.
Documents the scope of work, results, limitations and follow-up measures.
FONTANA-EOD carries out the commissioned technical investigation and documents its result. If ordnance is found, the responsible authorities decide on further action.
In Germany, the ordnance disposal services of the federal states and the locally competent authorities carry out hazard-response and find-management duties. Their involvement is established for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.
The precise names and allocation of responsibilities vary by region.
The local public order authority and, where applicable, building authority are involved according to their project-specific tasks. Conditions and contacts are assigned to the actual subarea; reporting procedures are specified before work starts.
The scope of activities, project location, construction stage and possible ordnance finds determine organisational requirements. For service areas, service specifications, qualifications, risk assessment and documentation are tailored to the relevant traffic and equipment areas.
In Germany, § 7 SprengG concerns the commercial authorisation for activities requiring authorisation; § 20 SprengG concerns the certificate of competence of responsible persons. Under § 1b SprengG, searching for found munitions also counts as handling them. The requirements applicable to the project depend on the activity actually commissioned and the allocation of responsibilities.
The risk assessment links survey and clearance methods with traffic, operations, construction equipment, protection zones, instructions, escape routes and communication. At service areas, moving traffic, public areas, night work and technical installations add organisational constraints.
DGUV Information 201-027 supports risk assessment and protective measures for explosive ordnance clearance work. The Baufachlichen Richtlinien Kampfmittelräumung contain requirements for historical and technical investigation, clearance concepts, procurement and documentation within their defined federal remit. Their application to the specific service area project is established separately.
If an unexpected suspicious object is encountered, stop work in the affected area immediately. Do not touch or move the object or expose it further. Leave the danger area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting route. The responsible authorities determine the next steps. Then inform site management.
The First Ordinance to the Explosives Act (1. SprengV) includes, among other things, requirements for specialist knowledge and state-recognised training courses. At service areas, required qualifications are related to the activities actually commissioned and the relevant construction sections.
DGUV Rule 113-003 concerns the dismantling or destruction of explosives or corresponding objects and also includes the disposal of found munitions. It applies according to this field of activity; it does not replace a risk assessment specific to the planned ground intervention.
The company, responsible persons and remit must match the specific activity.
Carrying out measurements alone must be distinguished organisationally from later clearance or recovery work.
Traffic, public areas, equipment, working zones, protective measures and reporting procedures are considered together.
Changes in construction phase are assessed against the specified work organisation and protective effectiveness.
Area, depth, methods, preparatory services, quality checks and documentation are clearly specified.
Provisional items receive a technical trigger so that their use remains traceable.
The work area, data, findings, limitations and conclusion are brought together.
The conclusion remains tied to the documented working volume and underlying construction stage.
The basis for suspicion, project geometry, qualification requirements, construction phases and documentation required under the contract are agreed.
This allows tenders to be compared technically and interfaces with traffic management and subsequent trades to be clearly regulated.
Responsible persons, working areas, instructions, hold points and changes must be known to those involved.
A change in construction stage may require a new specialist assessment even if an adjoining area has already been investigated.
Stop work immediately, do not touch, move or expose the object further, leave the immediate area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify 110 immediately; outside Germany, use the local emergency contact procedure.
Further action depends on the ordnance findings, local reporting procedure and regional responsibilities.
Drawings, survey data and field logs must represent the service area's complex structure. The documents show which areas were investigated and which tasks remain unresolved for the next construction sections.
The overview links construction sections, intervention depths and subsequent use so that each field service remains assigned to the part of the service area actually affected.
Assess subareas within the road project
The map shows substantiated areas of suspected ordnance, data gaps and recommended technical investigation areas.
Assess suspected ordnance areas and data gaps
Depth documentation describes the location and depth actually covered for chambers, foundations or boreholes.
Investigate chambers and foundations by depth
The log shows which layers were technically investigated and supervised. Unrecorded areas explicitly remain unresolved.
Arrange specialist supervision of excavation layers
The project file distinguishes measurement anomalies, technical interference objects, actual finds and outstanding measures.
Assign findings and further measures
The final report records initial data, investigations carried out, results and remaining limitations.
Organise the project file and final report

Historical assessment of suspected ordnance, technical surveying, deep investigation, construction-stage investigations and documentation are related to the same construction section of the service area.
Plan ordnance assessments for transport, utility, energy and other infrastructure projects according to their ground interventions.
Compare project settings
Plan road, sewer and civil engineering works involving crossings, drainage and foundations according to construction section and depth.
Establish the road construction context
Substantiate the basis for suspicion, affected subareas and subsequent technical investigations for service areas and car parks.
Assess historical evidence of suspected ordnance
Investigate deep foundations, chambers and borehole points according to location, direction and target depth.
Investigate deep work volumes
Assess whether explosive ordnance detection during construction is suitable for the unresolved excavation areas.
Prepare the excavation sequence
Coordinate recovery of confirmed ordnance with the permitted activities and local responsibilities.
Coordinate the processing of findings
Structure the service specification, quality checks, report, drawing revisions and partial handovers for service areas and car parks.
Prepare tendering and documentation
Have the site plan, intervention geometry, drawing revision, suspected ordnance documents and decision date for service areas and car parks assessed by specialists.
Enquire about a service area project with documents
Supplement the site location with the affected parking areas, aisles and equipment points. For a service area, include the direction of travel and section designation. The site plan, construction phases and existing requirements must concern the same subareas and identify planned extensions.
An existing surface establishes neither historically suspected ordnance nor the volume of ground already investigated. Earlier reports are therefore checked for location, depth, method and documented limitations before being used for the new ground intervention.
Check evidence against the interventionAn additional charging point, deeper chamber or relocated utility changes investigation requirements. Record the affected points on the current drawing and compare them with existing results before construction.
Explore the technical principlesTechnical information
How can carriageways, bridges and deep excavations be investigated for ordnance? The brochure explains preparation, suitable survey methods and supervision of earthworks.

Investigation requirements should be established as soon as ground interventions for aisles, parking spaces, utilities, drainage, buildings, masts or technical installations can be described. The specific working volume, with its location, depth and construction method, is decisive. A historical preliminary assessment can evaluate suspected ordnance spatially; the subsequent technical service depends on surface, interference conditions and intervention geometry.
A paved surface says nothing about whether the underlying working volume has been adequately assessed for the new works. Asphalt, concrete, utilities, reinforcement and technical installations may limit survey methods. Before deployment, it is therefore assessed what data depth and conclusions are achievable under existing conditions and whether demolition stages or supplementary methods are needed.
Helpful documents include the site plan, land parcels, extension or alteration design, construction sections, excavation depths, utility and drainage drawings, foundation and mast schedules, ground investigation documents, historical assessments and existing correspondence with authorities. For sites remaining in operation, traffic phases, closed areas and decision dates should also be stated.
Information and requirements from authorities are supplied with their date, complete appendices and geographical scope. In Germany, the competent ordnance disposal service, local public-order authority and, where relevant, building-control authority are identified for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.
If an unexpected suspicious object is found, stop work. Do not touch, move or uncover it further. Leave the immediate area and warn others without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting procedure. The competent authorities determine what happens next; a project enquiry does not replace reporting the find.
Where existing surfacing, buildings, technical installations or interference zones are present, the technical suitability of explosive ordnance detection during construction is assessed. Each working layer is surveyed and evaluated using technical methods before controlled removal in layers with supplementary visual inspection. The steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base. Construction stage, excavation layers, hold points, lines of instruction and documentation are established before work starts. Necessary investigations and protective measures are also planned before ground disturbance during breaking out or demolition; unrecorded areas remain unresolved.
In Germany, the federal states' explosive ordnance disposal services and locally responsible authorities perform emergency response and ordnance-find handling tasks. Outside Germany, local responsibilities apply. The privately commissioned specialist company assesses documents, carries out the agreed service and documents its result. Reporting procedures and contacts are established for the project location before earthworks begin.
The report describes initial conditions, drawing revision, subareas and depths investigated, methods used, survey and field conditions, findings, technical limitations and required follow-up measures. It identifies inaccessible zones or zones that cannot be reliably evaluated and relates the conclusion exclusively to the documented scope of work.
Relevant factors are the number and size of subareas, surface condition, utilities and interference, required investigation depths, number of deep points, traffic and closure phases, accessibility, data formats, documentation scope and possible follow-up services. Reliable costing therefore requires an unambiguous location and ground-intervention reference.
An initial enquiry does not need to contain a complete schedule of services. It should, however, show which subareas, structures and depths are affected and when the specialist decision is needed.
State the project address, federal state, land parcels and site plan, with boundaries for existing areas, extensions and individual construction sections.
Mark aisles, parking spaces, buildings, drainage, green areas, equipment areas and inaccessible zones.
For alternatives, it should be clear which geometry is binding and which is considered only as a possible extension.
Describe removal, new pavement construction, utility trenches, chambers, basins, foundations, boreholes, masts and demolition work.
State maximum depths, construction equipment, traffic phases, closure periods and the planned construction sequence.
Temporary access roads, storage and assembly areas are also relevant where ground disturbance or load transfer is proposed.
Include aerial photograph assessments, authority documents, utility drawings, ground investigation reports, as-built drawings and earlier survey reports.
State whether the result is needed for options appraisal, approval, procurement, site management, subarea handover or project completion.
Incomplete or contradictory documents can also be included; they show what clarification is still needed.
A site plan, brief description of the works, maximum intervention depth, construction phases, requested decision date and existing indications of suspected explosive ordnance are often sufficient for an initial assessment. FONTANA-EOD then identifies the information still required and the appropriate service area.
For extensive service areas, work can be organised by priority, construction section and use zone. Early decisions can thus be made without making blanket assumptions about areas or depths planned for later.
Aisles, parking bays, edge strips, pedestrian areas and planned pavement construction.
Alignments, chambers, basins, channels, base levels and existing utilities.
Masts, signs, buildings, transformer stations, charging points and ground investigation boreholes.
Closed areas, ongoing operation, access, handovers and decision dates.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.