Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.

Are you planning a utility trench or foundation between existing installations in Völklingen? Explosive ordnance assessment also requires information about installations, available working areas and access. FONTANA-EOD coordinates with you which investigations are possible under these conditions and how unresolved areas will be examined further.
Mark new trenches and foundations alongside existing structures.
Identify working areas and operational routes needed.
Show uninvestigated areas in the report too.
Show the planned groundworks and identify areas that will only become accessible for investigation later. Existing reports are checked for their actual spatial coverage. Operational routes, utility lines and known installations form part of the preparation. For unresolved subareas, the conclusions still missing and the next ground operation before which they are needed are recorded.
Service period: 2026-06
Service areas:Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworksDocumentation and interpretation of survey data
View project details · Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworks
Service period: 2025-09
Service areas:Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworks
View project details · Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworks
Service period: 2025-06
Service areas:Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworks
View project details · Ordnance specialist supervision of groundworks

Völklingen is part of the Regionalverband Saarbrücken. Its ten districts are Stadtmitte, Fenne, Fürstenhausen, Geislautern, Heidstock, Lauterbach, Ludweiler, Luisenthal, Röchlinghöhe and Wehrden. An investigation requires the specific property and its respective working areas to be stated. Enquiries from Saarbrücken, Großrosseln, Wadgassen, Saarlouis or Dillingen/Saar also need the municipality and project address. The responsible authorities and other parties are assigned using this location. Existing information, complete reports and the current ground intervention plan provide the basis for coordinating unresolved questions.
The Völklingen ironworks was founded in 1873 and taken over by the Röchling family in 1881. It shaped the city’s development until the old blast furnaces closed in 1986. War material was also manufactured here during the Second World War; American troops occupied the works in March 1945. For a present-day building plot, its own records of use, remaining installations and planned ground interventions are examined. Local industrial history helps identify the relevant documents; whether explosive ordnance is suspected and which investigation is needed follow from specialist assessment of the specific area.
The draft plan XI/36 “Einkaufsmarkt Lauterbach” dated 21 October 2024 shows that the ordnance issue may need to be clarified separately. Section 18.7 of its text refers to further detailed planning: it calls for an enquiry to the specialist authority or clarification by a commissioned specialist contractor. To prepare your own groundworks, you should therefore establish what specific information already exists for your property and who is addressing unresolved questions. At this point, the draft at the time contains neither evidence establishing suspected ordnance nor technical investigation results. Nor does it establish the present investigation status of the supermarket property.
Groundworks in Stadtmitte, Wehrden, Fürstenhausen, Fenne, Luisenthal, Geislautern, Lauterbach or other districts therefore require information about the respective property. If alterations are planned on a site that remains in use, operational routes, technical installations and areas accessible only temporarily must already be considered when preparing the investigation.
For projects on former ironworks and metalworking sites, storage areas, works railways, freight routes and energy and supply installations may form part of the planning context. In urban infill and redevelopment areas, reconstruction, later restructuring, demolition, filling and ground remodelling are examined using the respective property records. The investigation records which former installations remain and which appear only in old plans. Such information supports definition of the scope and planning of the method. A local category of use is distinguished from the knowledge actually available about suspected explosive ordnance.
For commissioned activities in Germany, clarify the relevant technical requirements and questions of permits, competence and responsibility. The actual proposed scope of services is the basis. It describes the specific activities and points of coordination with the parties responsible.
Risk assessment, work areas and communication must suit the proposed activities. Ordnance specialist works are coordinated with the other construction activities. Operational organisation, traffic safety and other specialist technical inspections retain their own responsible parties. Joint coordination brings the information together without equating the different tasks.
A measurement anomaly first requires specialist assessment; its appearance alone does not identify it as explosive ordnance. If an object is genuinely suspected to be ordnance, the prescribed reporting procedures and the measures set by the responsible authorities apply. Investigation reports specify the work completed and its limitations, so that results are not extended to unexamined areas or later design changes.
Site-specific procedure: City of Völklingen: city profile and history · City of Völklingen: districts.
Planning and documentation: BFR KMR: principles of clearance planning · BFR KMR: geophysics · BFR KMR: documentation · BFR KMR: Saarland state regulations · DGUV: explosive ordnance clearance FAQ
The BFR KMR are used as technical guidance; locally applicable requirements and responsibilities must be clarified separately.
Permits, certificates of competence and responsibility are assessed for the specific activity under the Explosives Act and the First Ordinance to the Explosives Act. The risk assessment under Section 5 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act relates to the planned activities. The DGUV Information 201-027 addresses the preventive investigation and clearance of conventional explosive ordnance and defines its scope. Its references to DGUV Regel 113-003 concern specific activities involving explosives; they are not applied indiscriminately to every construction investigation.
The project owner describes the project and provides the existing records. The operator adds requirements for use, access and timing. A coordinating contact brings the information together; everyone involved performs their respective assigned tasks. Before commissioning, it is clearly recorded which information is missing, who will obtain it and which decision the result is intended to inform.
The specialist designers describe areas, depths, construction methods and changes. Site management coordinates the planned sequence with the construction contractors and agreed specialist works. Results are assigned to the respective intervention. A technical plan change is communicated early enough for its effect on the survey task to be assessed before construction. Organisational construction stage boundaries remain distinguishable from technical survey boundaries.
The private explosive ordnance specialist carries out the agreed investigation and documentation scope. Official requirements and decisions are clarified with the competent authorities concerned. The documents needed for a particular procedure depend on the location and project. The technical report describes the specialist service performed; its conclusions are not presented unchecked as general authorisation for further groundworks or as an authority's decision.
State which subsequent ground operation is to be prepared and the depth relevant to it. The approach is then developed from this, together with existing knowledge and local conditions. A survey instrument already used elsewhere is not sufficient justification for the same method in the new area. Limitations and necessary additions are discussed before execution.
Compare suitable specialist servicesProvide available as-built plans and identify unknown or merely suspected routes. Information about foundations and disused utility lines helps prepare the investigation. It remains distinguishable from the actual explosive ordnance assessment. If additional ground or structural investigations are needed, their tasks and possible dependencies are coordinated with the responsible specialists before the respective ground interventions.
Compare investigation methods
Collect earlier explosive ordnance reports and their associated maps. Compare old hall and operational designations with the current plan. Clear assignment is particularly important where parts of the property have been altered or newly developed. Historical use and an earlier investigation are different kinds of information. What matters for the new task is which area was actually investigated and with what result.
An old report may already cover a section now known by a different name; equally, a familiar operational name may include an area extended later. The marked boundaries, height reference and documented conclusions remain decisive. Therefore also provide the associated overview maps and appendices. If an area cannot be assigned clearly, the unresolved location question is identified. Specialist planning can thus continue using suitable existing results and relate additions to the volumes of ground that actually remain unresolved.
Assign earlier results to the working areas
Describe access, working hours and known technical installations. Specialist planning clarifies how the conclusions needed can be achieved under these conditions. Areas usable only temporarily are explicitly included in the sequence. An investigation of an adjacent open area does not replace conclusions about an area that remains occupied if its ground is not covered by the documented scope.
For an access route usable only temporarily, the plan describes in advance when each working area may be available and who coordinates access. This does not yet promise that the necessary investigation can be completed within that period. Specialist planning also considers the required survey positions, existing installations and investigation scope. If the operator changes the available area, the new situation is checked before execution. Necessary preliminary works involving their own ground interventions are considered separately. They must not be brought forward unchecked as mere preparation ahead of a necessary explosive ordnance investigation.
Compare specialist services
Record in the report which sections were addressed and which limitations remain. These include restrictions due to lack of access as well as survey conditions. Site management receives the maps and explanations together. If an area that becomes available later is needed, the additional task can be described specifically without indiscriminately discarding results that already fit.
The results plan distinguishes an area not yet reached from an area surveyed but interpretable only to a limited extent. Both may need further clarification, but for different reasons. In the first case, access and timing need to be clarified; in the second, a supplementary measure justified by specialist assessment may be needed. Site management receives the respective cause with its location and the conclusions needed. A blanket statement of remaining area would obscure these differences. When further work is carried out later, the new result is related to the earlier status so that the planners and contractors can identify the current scope of the unresolved task.
Document findings and their limitationsFirst establish which decision the commission needs to support. Is the task an initial assessment of existing documents, an investigation of a specific area or examination of an anomaly that has already been assessed? These tasks require different evidence. A general wish for safety does not define an investigation that can be carried out. The enquiry therefore specifies the groundworks, location, depth and available findings. Suitable specialist work and the required reporting are then agreed on that basis.
Define the specialist taskRequired access and survey conditions are clarified before the site visit. This may include keeping areas clear, obtaining service information and coordinating with other trades. The method and site determine which preparations are actually needed. Changes to the surface or additional groundworks are not undertaken unilaterally simply to prepare for a survey. Their sequence is agreed with the specialist designers and responsible parties.
Clarify preparatory work in the programmeA sound workflow distinguishes work already clarified technically from outstanding prerequisites. If an area will be accessible only in part, commissioning must take this into account. Handover and assessment of results also need time in the construction sequence. An enquiry therefore does not imply a blanket commitment on dates or cost. Specific coordination connects the described scope with access, documents, execution conditions and the date by which a decision is needed.
Discuss the scope and scheduleShow on the site plan where the new utility line is intended to run in relation to known existing utility lines, foundations or paved areas. An old utility plan may help. Check how current and complete its information is. Assessment of suspected explosive ordnance and investigation of existing supply lines serve different purposes.
A new foundation requires its location, dimensions and planned depth of ground intervention to be stated. Nearby structures and metal installations can affect survey conditions. An investigation of the open peripheral area therefore cannot simply be applied to the more confined installation area. The investigation report must make clear which results apply to the peripheral area and which to the installation area.
If traffic routes, storage areas or technical facilities remain in use, possible investigation access must be coordinated with the operator. State spatial restrictions and the working areas available. Whether and how operations can continue during the investigation must be clarified for the respective working areas.
Planned demolition can change access to the ground. Describe separately which works are planned before the investigation and which themselves involve ground intervention. Clarify the ordnance issue before preparatory groundworks too. Until a concealed area can be investigated, it remains identified as unresolved for further construction planning.
A new utility line may cross an access route that is still needed. Show the ground intervention with its location and depth, and possible time slots. The investigation is coordinated with the operational sequence. Temporary diversions and their own groundworks also belong in this comparison if they are to be constructed for the works. The final utility plan alone often does not show these works in full. Where clearance work has been carried out, the clearance record documents the area addressed, agreed clearance objective, approach and findings, conclusions reached and remaining limitations. The site plan and other necessary appendices are handed over with the record.
If a diversion is newly planned after the first investigation is completed, its location is compared with the areas already addressed. Such an alternative route may involve different volumes of ground from the later utility route. Construction planning therefore records whether the existing report covers this intervention or what investigation is still necessary before it is constructed.
Even an accessible area may be investigable only to a limited extent because of installations or local interference. Explain known utility lines and foundations. The suitable specialist service is assessed against the investigation objective. Clearing the surface should therefore be coordinated with specialist planning; on its own, it guarantees neither a particular method nor unrestricted conclusions about the ground.
After an operational change, an area may become accessible while foundations, utility lines or other installations remain. The changed surface condition is therefore compared with previously documented survey conditions. Specialist planning decides what conclusions are now possible against the investigation objective. A previously uninvestigated subarea is managed as a separate work section. The report shows whether it has now actually been surveyed or limitations remain. For a new connection pit, its entire volume of ground also matters; the mere availability of the adjacent carriageway does not answer this investigation question.
Provide existing reports together with the current ground intervention plan. Mark which areas are accessible immediately and which will only become available after an operational change. Identify the first planned ground operation. Specialist planning can then define the necessary scope and sequence of services clearly, rather than merely scheduling a general investigation date for the entire site.
If a utility line is relocated or a restricted area is made accessible, provide the changed plan with a clear date. The existing results are related to this change. Additional tasks receive clear spatial boundaries. The handover to site management keeps clear which subareas have already been addressed sufficiently and which can only be used after a further investigation.
Historical aerial photographs and other old records are compared with present installation and operational plans. A former hall designation may refer to a different volume of ground from the current construction section number. Identifiable wartime impacts and changes of use are assigned spatially. Source assessment provides historical knowledge for investigation planning; it does not measure the ground accessible today.
Understand aerial photograph assessmentPassive magnetometry detects magnetic anomalies, particularly those caused by ferromagnetic objects. Between steel components, fencing and existing utility lines, their interference is considered in planning and interpretation. A signal is assessed by specialists; its strength alone does not identify ordnance. The interpretable area is documented with its limitations.
Understand the scope of magnetometryTDEM transmits electromagnetic pulses and records responses from electrically conductive objects. Whether this active method is suitable on an operational site depends on the investigation objective and actual conditions. Metal installations, accessible survey positions and interference are considered. An alternative method is selected according to the information needed.
Understand electromagnetic surveyingGround-penetrating radar uses electromagnetic waves and their reflections at material boundaries and structures. Layers, moisture and existing components affect interpretation. For a paved operational area, it is clarified whether the conclusions needed can be achieved. A radar image of utilities or existing structures is assessed against its purpose; reflections alone do not establish the presence of ordnance or allow conclusions at arbitrary depths.
GPR and limitationsFor a deeper foundation between existing installations, the location, required volume of ground and known utility lines are considered together. A borehole survey investigates defined points and depths. Suitable provision of investigation access is planned beforehand. Results from an open peripheral area or neighbouring boreholes are used only within their documented scope of conclusions.
Prepare deep interventionsAn investigation during construction connects technically suitable investigation sections with the planned earthworks. Working areas, investigation, interpretation and communication of findings are coordinated within the ongoing operational conditions. Merely looking at excavated material does not replace a necessary survey. For remaining gaps, the specific volume of ground concerned is identified before the next operation.
Agree the approach during constructionThe historical aerial photograph analysis and existing reports are related to the intended construction area. The review checks which former uses and changes are documented for the planned construction areas. Industrial use alone establishes neither a specific ordnance find nor its absence.
As-built documents for utility lines and structures help assess expected interference and possible investigation access. Their origin and currency are recorded. A documented utility route and a merely suspected connection are shown distinctly. If supplementary ground or structural investigations are planned, the information each specialist service is to provide and the volume of ground it affects are clarified. This coordination takes place before the respective works. Results from another investigation task are checked for their suitability for the specific ordnance question, rather than adopted solely because they share a project or area name.
A surface survey requires suitable investigation conditions. Utility lines, metal components, paved surfaces and other installations can affect interpretability. Which survey method or combination is technically suitable follows from the investigation objective and actual conditions. If an area cannot be reached, how it can be investigated must be clarified separately.
For subareas not yet sufficiently investigated, the necessary supplementary work must be defined. Depending on the task, this may involve supplementary methods or necessary ordnance surveying during construction. This is not equivalent to merely observing excavation. The method must be suitable for the investigation task. A short construction period alone does not justify its selection.
Show new ground interventions and known installations on a clear site plan. Initial contact clarifies the project location and conclusions needed. Existing plans and reports are reviewed for their currency, spatial reference, completeness and unresolved questions.
Where historical questions remain unresolved, the necessary source research and aerial photograph assessments are actually carried out. Former installations, identifiable wartime impacts and changes of use are assigned to today’s working areas. Specialist assessment informs investigation planning; existing sufficient underlying information is taken into account.
Describe access, paving, operational routes and inaccessible subareas. The necessary conditions and specialist works are coordinated with the operator, planners, site management and contractors.
Include existing knowledge and planned depths in specialist method selection. Specialist planning selects the suitable method for the required volume of ground and actual survey conditions.
The coordinated specialist works are carried out in the available subareas or at defined points. Measurement data and observations are given location and height references. Areas actually addressed, interference and areas not reached are documented. Where several time slots are used, it remains traceable which investigation was carried out under which conditions.
Specialist interpretation assesses data and findings under the actual survey conditions. It considers interference and the conclusions needed. The report and plan appendices document the volumes of ground addressed, results and remaining limitations. Necessary additions are identified with their spatial reference for the next coordination step.
Clarify changes and remaining gaps before subsequent ground interventions. Site management and the agreed recipients receive the report and plan appendices together. Further tasks are coordinated with the responsible parties for the working areas concerned.
The documentation must show which areas were actually surveyed and where interference or lack of access limits the conclusions. Investigation results and plan appendices are therefore passed on together. Unresolved areas must be explained in the report so that the planners and site management can use the results for the next groundworks.
The commissioned investigation and documentation by FONTANA-EOD remain separate from state hazard response. In Saarland, hazard response when ordnance is found is carried out by the responsible police authorities with the involvement of the state explosive ordnance disposal service. A private specialist service does not replace this responsibility.
FONTANA-EOD coordinates specialist works in Völklingen with accessible working areas and actually suitable investigation conditions. The operator describes operational routes, installations and possible access times; specialist planning assesses the conclusions needed. Where work is staged, completed investigations and unresolved areas remain distinguishable. A later change is compared with the documented status before the volume of ground concerned is affected.
Discuss the investigation taskWe first establish the investigation objective: which question must it answer? We then select a technically suitable method. The availability of a particular device or experience on a similar neighbouring site is not enough to justify the choice of method on its own.
Inaccessible areas and limited conclusions are identified. They do not disappear into a total area figure. Designers and site management can then decide specifically which areas still need attention and when a suitable survey becomes possible.
A new location, additional depth or different construction method is compared with previous results. A familiar project name does not replace this comparison. Feedback is provided before the affected work so that an outstanding question can be included in the sequence.
The technical conclusion remains connected to its location references and appendices. A brief summary helps orientation but does not replace the documented survey scope. This basis is retained even if site management or contractors change.
Use clear designations for investigated and unresolved areas. The maps should match the plan actually used by the operator and site management. If designations change, their connection to the report remains traceable. A contractor commissioned later can thus also identify which conclusions are available for its work and where it needs additional information before starting.
Understand investigation reports and their limitationsAlongside the results text, hand over maps, appendices and the limitations described. A short note about an investigation already carried out is often insufficient for a new ground intervention. When site management changes, the documented spatial and specialist scope is retained. Unresolved tasks are passed on with their reason and the respective working area concerned.
Understand the service scope
Aerial photograph interpretation is related to the actual groundworks. Its purpose and geographical scope remain distinct from a technical investigation of the ground as it is today.
Understand aerial photograph assessment
The findings, their locations and limitations are handed over together. This makes clear to those carrying out the work which area has been investigated and which task remains outstanding.
Assess investigation reports


Historical assessment, technical investigation and further work answer different questions. The service overview helps distinguish these tasks in an enquiry.
Compare services
Preparation connects the commission, site work and handover of findings. Changes to the project can then be incorporated into technical coordination in good time.
Process and documentationNo. To assess possible suspected explosive ordnance, the documents for the specific site and planned groundworks are reviewed. Former industrial use alone establishes neither the presence nor absence of explosive ordnance.
This cannot be promised across the board. Ground structure, installations, interference and the investigation objective determine whether a method can produce meaningful results. Limitations must be discussed before execution and documented in the results.
That depends on the specific task, access and necessary protective measures. Required working areas and operational processes are coordinated for the project. The restrictions needed must be clarified with the operator before the investigation.
They are identified in the report as unresolved areas. Once access becomes possible or the planned groundworks change, further investigation needs are assessed. Results from adjacent areas do not automatically apply to these areas.
Stop the affected work. Do not touch, move or relocate the suspicious object, and do not uncover it further. Leave the danger area, keep others away and call the police on 110 from a safe distance. Do not take the object to a police station. Follow the competent authorities' instructions.
Access, the investigation objective and actual survey conditions must also be clarified. A reserved date alone does not establish that an adequate investigation is possible.
The investigation objective, existing knowledge, areas and depths, and the suitable method are decisive. Installations and interference, available access, necessary preliminary works and division across several time slots can affect the work involved. The scope of services describes the agreed specialist work and results documents; further investigations or necessary clearance work are defined according to the need established by specialist assessment.
The first step is to check whether areas, depths or investigation conditions change. This establishes the specific additional need.
For your project in Völklingen, a site plan, planned depths of ground intervention, existing explosive ordnance documents and information on existing installations are helpful. Show ground interventions, access, paving and operational routes needed on the current plan. Mark which areas are available and which will only become accessible later. We discuss with you which investigations are needed before the planned groundworks.
For staged construction works, identify the first upcoming ground operation and the areas reserved for later phases. To clarify the offer, accessible working spaces and already known limitations are described separately. A reserved date does not replace specialist assessment of investigability. Necessary investigations and protective measures must be clarified before preparatory ground interventions. For the initial enquiry, you therefore do not need to break open any surfaces yourself, remove protective covers or expose unknown objects. Existing plans and safely available information form the basis; missing details are coordinated specifically with the responsible parties.
Provide reports with maps, appendices and the unresolved subareas identified in them. State the connection between former hall or operational designations and the present plan. For enquiries outside the city, add the municipality and project address; the regional assignment within Saarland then remains traceable. Responsibilities, documents and available access are coordinated for the actual project.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.