Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.

Which parts of your construction area have already been investigated, and what remains before the next groundworks? FONTANA-EOD supports commissioned assessment and documentation of investigation status in Moers. The report and site plan are compared with the proposed work. An investigation of part of a site does not automatically cover the whole project.
Check which work is complete and which remains outstanding.
Locate the boundaries identified in the report on the construction plan.
Compare location and depth with the existing result.
An interim report may already contain usable results while further areas remain unresolved. For your project in Moers, we compare the report, annexes and current construction plans. This identifies which findings concern the next ground intervention and what documents or work are still needed.
Service period: 2023-10
Service areas:Surface surveys: GPR, TDEM and magnetometryMethod used in this project: Ground-penetrating radarDocumentation and interpretation of survey data

The council papers dated 7 May 2024 for the fourth amendment to development plan 400 contain an interim report from the Düsseldorf explosive ordnance disposal service. It expressly concerns part of the site and announces a final report. For your project, the current investigation status, associated maps and planned work are clearly assigned. Moers is a town in the Wesel district, Düsseldorf administrative district, in North Rhine-Westphalia. For enquiries, provide the precise project address and area concerned. For a project in another municipality in the district, clarify local responsibility separately. The area information links the location with the appropriate procedure and specialist task needed.
The Moers council papers dated 7 May 2024 for the fourth amendment to development plan No. 400 reproduce an interim report from the explosive ordnance disposal service. It expressly applies only to the part investigated by then and shown on a map. A final report is announced for completion of the work. The documents record that project's status at the time; they do not establish today's conditions or those of other properties in Moers.
For your project, compare the area investigated in the report with the work now planned. The same property address is not sufficient. Read the maps and annexes too, and check whether the document is an interim status or final result.
The equalisation-of-burdens records in the town archive record building-specific bomb damage from the war years, including 1942 and 1944. For today's project file, assign such details using the historical address and area affected. Later alterations, demolition or fill may have changed construction conditions. Historical building entries and technical investigation results retain their respective purpose; the specific next groundworks are prepared using findings relevant to them.
For the commissioned activities, the relevant technical requirements and questions of permits, competence certification and responsibility are clarified. The actual planned service scope is decisive. A general company designation does not replace checking that the tasks and interfaces are described appropriately for the specific project.
The risk assessment, working areas and communication must fit the planned activities. Explosive ordnance specialist works are coordinated with the other construction works. Operational organisation, traffic safety and other technical checks retain their own responsible parties. Joint coordination brings the information together and assigns tasks and decisions to the respective competent participants.
A measurement anomaly first requires specialist assessment; its appearance alone does not identify it as explosive ordnance. If an object is genuinely suspected to be ordnance, the prescribed reporting procedures and the measures set by the responsible authorities apply. Investigation reports specify the work completed and its limitations, so that results are not extended to unexamined areas or later design changes.
Procedure at the site: Town of Moers: council papers dated 7 May 2024, interim report on part of a site · North Rhine-Westphalia Ministry of the Interior: explosive legacy · North Rhine-Westphalia KampfmittelVO: Section 3 in particular.
Planning and documentation: BFR KMR: principles of clearance planning · BFR KMR: geophysics · BFR KMR: documentation
The BFR KMR are used as technical guidance; locally applicable requirements and responsibilities must be clarified separately.
The permit, qualifications and responsibilities for the specific activity are assessed under the Explosives Act and the First Ordinance to the Explosives Act. The risk assessment under Section 5 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act relates to the planned activities. The DGUV Information 201-027 addresses preventive investigation and clearance of conventional explosive ordnance and defines its scope. The references it explains to DGUV Regel 113-003 concern specific activities involving explosives; they are not applied indiscriminately to every construction investigation.
Private works are subject to the exceptions under the KampfmittelVO and the requirements of the official guidance. The exceptions concern, in particular, downhole detection as part of specialist foundation engineering and explosive ordnance clearance during construction under the conditions laid down by law. Private explosive ordnance clearance during construction requires that prior investigation using recognised explosive ordnance detection methods is not possible. A relevant factor is also the state explosive ordnance disposal service's assessment that there are no specific indications of ordnance contamination on the site concerned. All further spatial, technical and organisational requirements are clarified for the specific activity. The competent authorities decide on the official appointment.
The client describes the project and provides the available project documents. The operator adds requirements relating to use, access and scheduling. The participants agree their respective tasks and decision-making responsibilities. A coordinating contact person brings the project information together. Before an appointment, it is recorded clearly which information is missing, who will obtain it and which decision the result is intended to support.
The specialist designers describe areas, depths, construction methods and changes. Site management coordinates the planned sequence with the construction contractors and agreed specialist works. Results are assigned to the respective intervention. A technical plan change is communicated early enough for its effect on the survey task to be assessed before construction. Organisational construction stage boundaries remain distinguishable from technical survey boundaries.
The private explosive ordnance specialist company carries out the agreed permissible investigation and documentation scope. Authority requirements and decisions are clarified with the respective competent bodies. The documents needed for a specific procedure depend on the site and project. The technical report documents the specialist service performed, including areas, depths and limits of its conclusions. Its applicability to further groundworks is checked against the specific intervention.
The local public order authority of the town of Moers is responsible for ordnance hazard response. It is supported by the state explosive ordnance disposal service at the Düsseldorf District Government. Competent authorities handle official requirements and make decisions within their respective remit. Private specialist work is prepared within its legally permissible, agreed scope and with necessary coordination. Technical results and outstanding official processing are assigned separately for the next construction phase.
An aerial photograph analysis, on-site investigation and report on an individual location answer different questions. Establish the basis of the interim status. Its title alone does not determine a method. Remaining needs follow from the actual content and planned ground interventions.
Assess historical documentsAn uninvestigated part of a site does not automatically require repetition of all previous work. First assess existing results, limits and technical conditions. A suitable addition addresses the remaining task. Official requirements and prerequisites for a permissible private activity in North Rhine-Westphalia remain decisive.
Compare investigation methods
Read the spatial boundary together with the report text. A project address or property name often does not adequately describe actual scope. Request missing maps from the issuer. Investigation of individual areas is not extended to the whole project merely because the project name is shared.
Record the investigation boundary and intended construction area with a clear plan version. A construction section may include an area already addressed and an unresolved peripheral area, for example. Consider the findings usable for the next ground intervention separately for these areas. Specialists identify the necessary addition if the area or depth remains unclear from existing documents. The project file records which maps are used for further coordination.
Document findings and their limitations
An announced final report is not yet available evidence. Record which work or documents remain outstanding and the area they concern. Check the current status before the next construction decision. Time elapsed since an interim report does not evidence later completion of the work.
Identify, for example, whether another area must first become accessible, measurements remain outstanding or interpretation is not yet available. These tasks have different prerequisites and recipients. Date coordination therefore depends on the actual processing status of the area concerned. When new documents arrive, record their dates and relationship to earlier results. Provide site management with the updated status for coordination before the affected work.
Coordinate the sequence and tasks
An existing partial result may be relevant to a particular section without covering further sections. Assign location, depth and planned activity to the documented results. The specialist decision follows this specific correspondence. Areas not addressed remain expressly identifiable even in a shared construction programme.
The question may change even in the same area, for example where a deeper excavation replaces a shallow connection trench. State the new depth with the applicable elevation reference and identify additional working areas. The specialist contractor checks existing results against this ground intervention. Necessary additions are agreed within their permissible scope. Before preparatory ground interventions, clarify the investigations and protective measures needed.
Document findings and their limitationsHistorical preliminary assessment, technical investigation and specialist work during construction answer different project questions. The permissible private activity under the specific North Rhine-Westphalia procedure is clarified with the information objective and necessary authority involvement before an agreement.
First establish which decision the commission needs to support. Is the task an initial assessment of existing documents, an investigation of a specific area or examination of an anomaly that has already been assessed? These tasks require different evidence. A general wish for safety does not define an investigation that can be carried out. The enquiry therefore specifies the groundworks, location, depth and available findings. Suitable specialist work and the required reporting are then agreed on that basis.
Define the specialist taskRequired access and survey conditions are clarified before the site visit. This may include keeping areas clear, obtaining service information and coordinating with other trades. The method and site determine which preparations are actually needed. Changes to the surface or additional groundworks are not undertaken unilaterally simply to prepare for a survey. Their sequence is agreed with the specialist designers and responsible parties.
Clarify preparatory work in the programmeThe scope of private specialist work is agreed using the project documents, actual execution conditions and permissible activity. Necessary preparatory works, investigation, evaluation and documentation are described transparently. Costs and dates are related to these prerequisites and the required coordination. Changes to the construction plans are checked against the agreed contract before work is extended.
Discuss the scope and scheduleCheck which work the report describes. Historical analysis answers different questions from an on-site measurement or investigation of a suspected location. Documented content is decisive for your plans; the report heading alone is insufficient.
Compare the area in the report with the current site plan. Property boundaries, investigation boundaries and excavation edges may differ. If the report's map is missing, request it from the issuer before assessing the result's scope.
Look for uninvestigated areas, limitations and further work announced. An interim report may already contain usable results while the overall investigation continues. List outstanding tasks separately so construction planning considers them.
Describe the location, depth and construction type of the next groundworks. A foundation may need different information from the neighbouring area already investigated. Use the report to check whether the result covers the intended work.
A single extract may omit essential limits or outstanding tasks. Keep the covering letter, result report and maps together with their dates. Later additions identify which version was replaced or updated. The project file should show actual processing status, rather than merely the title of the most recently received document.
For a construction section, file related letters and plans so their connection remains traceable. For a plan supplied later, clarify which report version it belongs to. Identify the area changed by a correction while keeping older results still usable identifiable. A question to the issuer specifies the relevant location in the document and the outstanding spatial question. Missing information can then be added specifically.
Even a final report is read according to its task and applicability. Site management needs complete results and details of limitations. Completing the agreed commission does not automatically mean every future activity has been assessed. Changes to construction plans are compared separately with existing findings.
Before handover to another contractor, compare the planned groundworks with the documented service scope. State which area has since been prepared or become accessible and whether further foundations, utilities or ancillary installations are added. Those carrying out the work receive reports with their annexes and current construction plan. Outstanding specialist or official tasks are assigned to each affected work step. The next commission can then address a specific supplementary need. After clearance work, the clearance record with its scope, results and remaining limits is assigned to the construction section actually treated and its site plan.
Compile the report with all annexes and the current site plan. Identify the specific construction section and associated decision. Check whether newer documents are announced or already available. Assessment considers both usable results and parts expressly left unresolved.
Compare the new work area with the investigation status now documented. Update assignments if further reports or maps have arrived. Internal authorisation of a construction phase does not replace this specialist comparison. Outstanding prerequisites are agreed with those responsible before the affected work.
Historical aerial photograph assessment and other old records help place the basis for suspicion in its spatial context. The available images, their evidential value and the limits of the area considered matter. The absence of an identifiable indication must be distinguished from a technically surveyed ground area. The assessment is considered together with the planned intervention and other available findings. It can support the choice of a survey, but is not a measurement of the present-day subsurface or confirmation for all future works.
Understand aerial photograph assessmentMagnetometric methods detect magnetic anomalies. Whether they can address the specific investigation task depends, among other things, on the expected objects, subsurface conditions, interference and investigation area required. Fences, utilities or existing structures can affect interpretation. A signal is therefore not classified as explosive ordnance solely on its strength. The method, interpretation and any further investigation are planned as a connected specialist task. Magnetometry measures the magnetic field passively. The magnetic effect of the target object is decisive; electrical conductivity alone does not establish its detectability by this method.
Understand the scope of magnetometryElectromagnetic investigations may be suitable for certain metallic target objects and site conditions. Suitability is justified for the particular task rather than inferred from the mere availability of an instrument. Interfering installations, accessible areas and the required conclusion must also be considered. Results are documented with their locations and investigation conditions. Whether a supplementary method is needed follows from technical assessment and remains a specific project decision. Transient electromagnetic methods, or TDEM, evaluate the time-dependent electromagnetic response of conductive objects. The method is selected according to the investigation objective and actual measurement conditions.
Understand electromagnetic surveyingUnder suitable conditions, ground-penetrating radar can provide information about subsurface structures and reflections. Ground conditions, moisture, installations and the particular survey task affect interpretability. An anomaly is not automatically ordnance, and an area with no apparent anomalies is not general evidence for arbitrary depths. The specialist interpretation and its limits are documented with the instruction. A survey for another purpose is not adopted without checking as ordnance evidence.
GPR and limitationsFor deeper groundworks, it may be necessary to establish whether a surface investigation can provide the required findings or another approach is needed. Preparation includes the location, depth, borehole layout and existing services. Creating access for the investigation must also be properly planned by specialists. A general depth figure or standard grid cannot replace that work. Findings remain limited to the areas actually investigated and the method used.
Prepare deep interventionsIf a necessary preliminary investigation cannot be completed, the specialists assess whether a planned approach during construction is suitable. This includes coordinated investigation, interpretation and communication of findings within the intended work sequence. Visual observation of excavated material is not an interchangeable substitute for a necessary survey. Site management needs a clear description of when specialist work will take place, how new findings will be handled and which areas remain unresolved.
Agree the approach during constructionA historical aerial photograph analysis must be distinguished from an on-site technical investigation. Where several documents exist, record which investigation each finding comes from. Only then can it be assessed which questions for the next groundworks are already answered.
For several results, also establish the ground surface and construction conditions underlying each. After soil removal or filling, identical depth figures may describe different volumes of ground. Compare existing elevations with the current plan and identify missing references. Specialist assessment also considers known interference and uninvestigated areas. The data that can continue to be used are assessed from the complete documentation and new investigation objective.
For a survey the investigated area and documented survey conditions belong together. A result does not apply to additional ground merely because the report is later assigned to a larger project. Retain information on limitations too. Where measurability is restricted, suitable supplementary investigations or permissible supervision during construction are agreed by specialists. Methods and result limits are assigned to the specific commission.
The clearance plan or the investigation plan considers outstanding questions. First check what existing results already cover. What further work is necessary and permissible is clarified by specialists and with the responsible authorities.
If plans contain several options, identify the version applicable to the next decision. An additional route or relocated foundation may affect a volume of ground not previously addressed. Those involved clarify what information is missing and whether another investigation is necessary before the affected work. The quotation describes the agreed task with its prerequisites and result documents. After execution, new and reused results are brought together distinguishably in the project file.
Compile the report, maps and annexes. Check whether a newer version or the announced final report is now available. Read separate documents individually first; they need not have the same investigation scope. Provide the project address, investigation question and complete existing documents. Analyses and reports are checked for revision status, spatial agreement and gaps. For unresolved historical questions, undertake the necessary source research and aerial photograph analysis, assigning them to today's ground intervention.
Mark investigated areas on the current construction plan and identify unresolved areas. This defines outstanding tasks. Specialist assessment of the investigation method and its results is still required. The suitable method is agreed according to the information sought, intervention depth, ground structure, utilities and survey conditions. Responsibilities and execution prerequisites are clarified before work.
The survey or investigation during construction appointed under North Rhine-Westphalia's requirements is carried out in the agreed areas and points. Measurement data and observations receive traceable location and elevation references. Uninvestigated areas, restricted access and relevant interference are recorded.
The collected data and findings are evaluated against the investigation objective. The technical assessment considers interference, the areas reached and remaining limits of the conclusions. It establishes which further investigation or work is needed for the planned groundworks.
The report and plan attachments document the specialist works performed and their assessment. Worked areas, investigation depths, the relevant ground surface and limitations remain assigned. Reused older results and newly investigated areas are recorded distinctly. The agreed recipients receive the related documents together.
For supplementary reports, state which earlier status they relate to. Keep the earlier documents. If results are summarised, limitations of each investigation must remain identifiable. The report and associated plans document specialist work performed, its assessment, areas and depths, and remaining limitations of findings.
Hand reports and plans for the forthcoming work to site management. Identify outstanding questions and responsible contacts. For several parts of a site, it must be clear which result applies to which work area.
Even for a final report, check which areas and work it covers. It is not an unlimited assurance for every later use. If a new area or different groundworks are added, specialists must assess whether existing results are sufficient.
The BFR Kampfmittelräumung describe documentation requirements. Outside their direct scope, they provide specialist guidance. In North Rhine-Westphalia, the responsibilities of local public order authorities and state explosive ordnance disposal services must be observed. FONTANA-EOD undertakes the legally permissible services commissioned.
We assess the planned groundworks against the available documents and their design revision. Before attending site, we agree with you what needs to be investigated, which areas are accessible and what findings are required. If the design or site conditions change, we check whether the agreed scope remains appropriate. The report states what was actually investigated and the limits of the findings. This allows designers and site management to see which findings they can use and where questions remain.
Discuss the investigation taskWe first establish the investigation objective: which question must it answer? We then select a technically suitable method. The availability of a particular device or experience on a similar neighbouring site is not enough to justify the choice of method on its own.
Inaccessible areas and limited conclusions are identified. They do not disappear into a total area figure. Designers and site management can then decide specifically which areas still need attention and when a suitable survey becomes possible.
A new location, additional depth or different construction method is compared with previous results. A familiar project name does not replace this comparison. Feedback is provided before the affected work so that an outstanding question can be included in the sequence.
The technical conclusion remains connected to its location references and appendices. A brief summary helps orientation but does not replace the documented survey scope. This basis is retained even if site management or contractors change.
An older interim report may still evidence part of the project history. It does not establish whether further work has since taken place. Ask those responsible for the current status and update the project file. An assumption about progress does not replace verifiable results.
Understand investigation reports and their limitationsA report may close an agreed commission while still containing spatial or technical limitations. Read the task, maps and result together. Assessment of the next ground intervention rests on these details. A document title does not give an additional area a finding absent from the report.
Understand the service scope
Aerial photograph interpretation is related to the actual groundworks. Its purpose and geographical scope remain distinct from a technical investigation of the ground as it is today.
Understand aerial photograph assessment
The findings, their locations and limitations are handed over together. This makes clear to those carrying out the work which area has been investigated and which task remains outstanding.
Assess investigation reports


Historical assessment, technical investigation and further work answer different questions. The enquiry describes the outstanding task, affected areas and depths, and the results required. The permissible scope of services is agreed in line with the actual conditions and responsibilities.
Compare services
Preparation connects the commission, site work and handover of findings. Changes to the project can then be incorporated into technical coordination in good time.
Process and documentationAn interim report may contain results for a particular part of the site. Check which work was performed there and which remains outstanding. Usable results remain important, but must not be treated as completion for the whole area.
No. Compare the area identified in the report and its maps with the planned groundworks. Additional areas or greater depths are not automatically covered because the address is the same.
No. The 2024 council papers record the status of a particular project at the time. Today's planning needs the applicable current documents. The report also says nothing about other Moers properties.
First determine further investigation needs from existing results and planned groundworks. Responsible authorities must be involved in the necessary steps. A permissible private commission describes the specific specialist service. State decisions and further investigations needed are clarified with those responsible. Existing results remain assigned to their actual investigation scope.
Stop the affected work, do not touch or move the object and move away. Keep other people away and notify the police immediately on 110 or the local public order authority. Follow their instructions and do not attempt investigation or recovery yourself.
Through supplementary documents actually available and confirmed processing status. An announcement in an interim report or elapsed time does not evidence completion.
This is assessed from the specific location, depth, activity and documented finding. The usable scope and outstanding prerequisites must be traceable for that section.
The applicable complete version is needed with its annexes and traceable assignment to earlier reports. Earlier results and later additions are kept together with their respective applicability. Effort depends on usable previous documents, access and preparation, the area or number and depth of investigation points, a suitable method, survey conditions, interpretation and documentation. Specialist services still required are quoted specifically on this basis.
Include interim and final reports with maps and identify announced documents still missing. Also state the project address and investigation question for the next step. Reports include complete associated plans with dates and elevation references. Record which area is accessible today and what preparatory work is planned. The specialist contractor can then assign existing findings to the requested commission and identify further information needed.
Show the specific work area with location, intervention depth and the decision for which the result is needed. Mark uninvestigated areas and known limitations on the current plan. For a change, identify the replaced version and show the additional volume of ground. Responsibilities and necessary coordination remain assigned to each task. For intended area clearance or a recovery task, clarify the specific scope and permissible commission with the responsible authority.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.