Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.

Planning an excavation, utility works or boreholes in Stuttgart? An explosive ordnance investigation must align the present ground, planned working levels and individual deeper points. Send the site plan, sections and existing explosive ordnance documents; FONTANA-EOD agrees the investigation scope needed with the project owner, specialist planners and site management.
Show the present surface and planned elevations.
State the excavation base and additional low points.
Record the investigated area and depth in the report.
For an explosive ordnance investigation before construction in Stuttgart, the existing ground and planned groundworks are shown with a clear elevation reference. The site plan, sections and earlier investigation results are reviewed together. This helps clarify which volume of ground has already been assessed and what research, surveying or suitable monitoring is required for the next works.
KMO Rockenhausen
KMO Stuttgart
Service period: 2023-10
Service areas:Surface surveys: GPR, TDEM and magnetometryMethod used in this project: Ground-penetrating radar
The services and quantities stated relate to several project locations and are not itemised separately for each site.

Services from Stuttgart's municipal surveying office help describe the location. An explosive ordnance investigation identifies the actual project address, property and planned ground disturbance. Enquiries from Stuttgart-Mitte, -Nord, -West and -Süd, Bad Cannstatt, Feuerbach, Zuffenhausen, Vaihingen, Möhringen or Untertürkheim are assigned to their respective construction areas. Stuttgart is an urban district in the administrative district of the same name in Baden-Württemberg. For projects in Esslingen am Neckar, Ludwigsburg, Böblingen, Sindelfingen, Fellbach, Waiblingen, Leinfelden-Echterdingen or other surrounding municipalities, local responsibility is clarified using the specific project location. City and surrounding locations remain connected to their own documents. Further project locations are available in the regional overview. The official regional classification depends on the actual project location.
For regional information about your construction project, the Stuttgart administrative district overview leads to further local information.
Stuttgart's municipal surveying office maintains, among other data, contour lines, a digital terrain model and horizontal and vertical control points. These geodata can support the spatial project description. They replace neither the surveying basis required for the project nor an explosive ordnance investigation. The designers must clarify which data are sufficiently accurate and current for each purpose.
Planning records when the elevation data used were collected and which ground condition they represent. An older model may help with assessment, while areas since excavated or newly filled must be described separately for the forthcoming investigation. State which surface the drawing shows and which is to be created later. Where several people are involved, the origin, plan version and reference system remain available together. Conflicting information is clarified before measurement or drilling points are defined.
The text for the Hackstraße 2/Stöckachplatz development plan (Stgt 289), submitted in 2018, contains separate notes on elevations and explosive ordnance. It names an aerial photograph assessment already carried out and describes indications of further measures required at the time. This statement relates to the planning case described there. If you use older assessments for your project, also include any subsequent investigation reports available. Compare the area covered and ground condition at the time with the groundworks planned today.
For an enquiry, the plan layout and elevation information should align. Describe the existing condition and proposed changes separately. For an excavation across different ground levels, a single depth without a reference is insufficient. Nor does a sloping site alone establish explosive ordnance contamination or a particular investigation method.
The Stuttgart City Encyclopaedia describes the air raids of 1944 and subsequent reconstruction. For current projects, historical documents are compared with later changes to the construction area. Documented former industrial, production, storage and logistics uses, railway and road routes, and ground built over or filled may be relevant. For housing, neighbourhood development, municipal renewal and conversion, the findings concerning the specific area are checked in each case. The investigation scope required cannot be determined from the use category or city location alone, but only in conjunction with specialist documents and the planned ground disturbance.
For the commissioned work, the applicable technical requirements, permits, competence and responsibilities are clarified. The actual scope of work is what matters. Tasks and interfaces are described for the project and checked against the required authorisations.
The risk assessment, work areas and communication arrangements must suit the planned activities. Specialist explosive ordnance work is coordinated with the other construction activities. Site organisation, traffic safety and other technical assessments retain their own responsible parties. Joint coordination assigns the relevant specialist work and responsibilities to the affected construction sections.
A measurement anomaly first requires specialist assessment; its appearance alone does not identify it as explosive ordnance. If an object is genuinely suspected to be ordnance, the prescribed reporting procedures and the measures set by the responsible authorities apply. Investigation reports specify the work completed and its limitations, so that results are not extended to unexamined areas or later design changes.
The Stuttgart municipal surveying office provides contour lines, terrain models and horizontal or vertical control points. For an explosive ordnance investigation, these data are compared with the current ground and planned ground disturbance.
The BFR KMR guidelines on clearance planning describe preparation of the specialist task. Geophysical methods are selected according to the investigation objective and site conditions; the documentation requirements support handover of results. The DGUV FAQs on explosive ordnance clearance address the requirements for investigations during construction. The KMBD Baden-Württemberg is based at the Stuttgart regional authority. The KMBD application documents explain project-specific preliminary investigation and the information needed for it.
For an application for preliminary investigation, the investigation area is clearly marked and assigned to the proposed construction project. The KMBD forms and information also explain updating existing aerial photograph assessments when delays occur. Agree the processing status needed well before the groundworks affected. A changed excavation, additional boreholes or new findings are compared with the original investigation commission. Those responsible for design and the specialist contractor clarify which documents remain applicable and what additions are needed for the forthcoming work.
The BFR KMR are used as technical guidance; locally applicable requirements and responsibilities must be clarified separately.
Permits, competence and responsibility for the specific activity are considered under the Explosives Act and the First Ordinance to the Explosives Act. The risk assessment under Section 5 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act relates to the planned activities. The DGUV Information 201-027 covers preventive investigation and clearance of conventional explosive ordnance and defines its scope. Its references to DGUV Rule 113-003 concern particular activities involving explosives; they are not applied indiscriminately to every construction-site investigation.
The client describes the project and provides the available project records. The operator adds requirements for use, access and timing. A coordinating contact brings the parties together; individual tasks remain assigned to the named parties. Before commissioning, it is clearly recorded what information is missing, who will obtain it and what decision the result is intended to prepare.
The specialist designers describe areas, depths, construction methods and changes. Site management coordinates the planned sequence with the construction contractors and agreed specialist works. Results are assigned to the respective intervention. A technical plan change is communicated early enough for its effect on the survey task to be assessed before construction. Organisational construction stage boundaries remain distinguishable from technical survey boundaries.
The private explosive ordnance specialist contractor addresses the agreed investigation and documentation scope. The technical report describes the specialist services carried out with their documented area, depth and service scope. Documents needed for a specific procedure depend on the site and project. Official requirements and decisions are clarified with the respective responsible authorities.
In Baden-Württemberg, the explosive ordnance disposal service is based at the Stuttgart regional authority. Preliminary investigation by the KMBD is prepared with an application and plan of the investigation area. For technical investigation, the task, methods and documentation are agreed with the appointed specialist contractor. The KMBD undertakes rendering ordnance safe, transporting recovered ordnance and its destruction. For a possible find, notify the local police authority or nearest police station; they involve the KMBD. For the construction project, technical specialist work, official requirements and subsequent construction works remain identified with their respective responsible parties. The procedure for a find is described in the KMBD rules of conduct.
Terrain alone does not determine an investigation method. Existing findings, the specific ground disturbance and conditions in the construction area are decisive. These include accessibility, existing utilities and structural obstacles. First describe which question must be answered before which groundworks. Specialists then define suitable methods and their limitations.
Compare suitable investigation methods and limitationsA result is usable only within its documented scope. Across different ground levels, the ground condition from which depths are referenced therefore also matters. Areas not sufficiently covered are identified. Before deeper or laterally altered works, the new task is compared with existing results and supplemented where necessary.
Compare investigation methods
An earlier site plan describes the condition at that time and has its own accuracy. Pass on the complete appendices, even if a new plan is already available. Historical information is assessed by specialists in relation to the proposed ground disturbance. Differences between former and present ground remain identifiable rather than being obscured by an oversimplified depth.
Arrange specialist assessment of historical evidence
An excavation may contain different base levels and individual deeper structural elements. Show these areas in the plan and suitable sections. This gives the specialist investigation a traceable scope. Shoring, foundations and additional utility trenches are also considered where they form part of the planned groundworks. The method is then selected according to the task and local conditions.
Compare specialist services
The report must identify the areas investigated and associated elevation reference. Site management needs these details together with the documented limitations. For later changes to ground disturbance, check which conclusions remain applicable. The earlier report is retained with its plan version; a new drawing does not extend its substantive scope.
Document findings and their limitationsFirst establish which decision the commission needs to support. Is the task an initial assessment of existing documents, an investigation of a specific area or examination of an anomaly that has already been assessed? These tasks require different evidence. A general wish for safety does not define an investigation that can be carried out. The enquiry therefore specifies the groundworks, location, depth and available findings. Suitable specialist work and the required reporting are then agreed on that basis.
Define the specialist taskRequired access and survey conditions are clarified before the site visit. This may include keeping areas clear, obtaining service information and coordinating with other trades. The method and site determine which preparations are actually needed. Changes to the surface or additional groundworks are not undertaken unilaterally simply to prepare for a survey. Their sequence is agreed with the specialist designers and responsible parties.
Clarify preparatory work in the programmeA realistic programme distinguishes technically resolved work from prerequisites that are still outstanding. If only part of a site will be accessible, the commission must take this into account. Handover and assessment of the results also need time in the construction programme. The schedule and effort are agreed once the scope, access and prerequisites are clear. This coordination brings together the specified scope, access, documents, site conditions and the date by which a decision is needed.
Discuss the scope and scheduleMark the surface to which existing plans and earlier investigations refer. Changes in level, fill and areas already altered should be identifiable. Mark estimated elevations as such. Do not pass them on as accurate surveying.
Show the levels intended after the proposed excavation or filling. A depth below today's ground level is not automatically the same as a depth below a later working level. A section can show this relationship more clearly than several unrelated figures on a plan.
Individual foundations, shafts or recesses may extend below the general excavation base. List these ground disturbance areas separately with their locations and reference elevations. Include these deeper areas explicitly in the investigation commission; showing the main excavation alone may leave them out.
If the terrain changes during design or a structural element is placed deeper, compare this with the existing investigation. The documented volume of ground is decisive. Check the substance of the design change: a new plan name alone does not make the report unusable, but an additional depth of ground disturbance is not automatically covered.
Identify who provides the location and elevation information needed and which version is to be used. Unclear reference points are clarified before work. Construction design and the investigation commission then refer to the same condition. A drawing suitable for an initial overview is not necessarily accurate enough for later construction.
If an excavation is deepened or an individual foundation is added, include the change in the shared design information. Mark the affected areas and new elevation. The specialist planner can then assess whether the previous investigation scope applies. A construction date change alone does not describe this spatial extension or replace the necessary comparison. Comparison with clearance work carried out considers its clearance record: areas addressed, methods, findings and remaining tasks are assigned to the respective plan and elevation references.
Send the site plan showing proposed ground disturbance and informative sections. Pass on existing assessments and technical reports in full with their appendices. Clearly mark unknown details. A shared description of existing conditions and the design makes it easier to decide which documents or investigations are needed next.
Compare the forthcoming ground disturbance with the area described in the report. A new excavation base, another shoring section or an additional foundation may require its own review. The specialist planner records the additional work needed. The next section is prepared only on the basis of documents appropriate to it.
Historical aerial photograph assessment and other old records help place the basis for suspicion in its spatial context. The available images, their evidential value and the limits of the area considered matter. The absence of an identifiable indication must be distinguished from a technically surveyed ground area. The assessment is considered together with the planned intervention and other available findings. It can support the choice of a survey, but is not a measurement of the present-day subsurface or confirmation for all future works.
Understand aerial photograph assessmentMagnetometric methods detect magnetic anomalies. Whether they can address the specific survey task depends, among other things, on the expected objects, ground conditions, interference and required survey area. Fences, utilities or existing structures may affect interpretation. A measurement signal is therefore not described as ordnance solely because of its strength. Method, interpretation and any further investigation are planned as a connected specialist task.
Understand the scope of magnetometryElectromagnetic investigations can be suitable for particular metallic targets and site conditions. Their suitability must be explained for the task, rather than inferred simply from the availability of equipment. Interfering installations, accessible areas and the findings required must also be considered. Results are documented with their location and survey conditions. The specialist assessment determines whether a supplementary method is needed; this remains a project-specific decision.
Understand electromagnetic surveyingUnder suitable conditions, ground-penetrating radar can provide information about subsurface structures and reflections. Ground conditions, moisture, installations and the particular survey task affect interpretability. An anomaly is not automatically ordnance, and an area with no apparent anomalies is not general evidence for arbitrary depths. The specialist interpretation and its limits are documented with the instruction. A survey for another purpose is not adopted without checking as ordnance evidence.
GPR and limitationsFor deeper groundworks, it may be necessary to establish whether a surface investigation can provide the required findings or another approach is needed. Preparation includes the location, depth, borehole layout and existing services. Creating access for the investigation must also be properly planned by specialists. A general depth figure or standard grid cannot replace that work. Findings remain limited to the areas actually investigated and the method used.
Prepare deep interventionsIf a necessary preliminary investigation cannot be completed, the specialists assess whether a planned approach during construction is suitable. This includes coordinated investigation, interpretation and communication of findings within the intended work sequence. Visual observation of excavated material is not an interchangeable substitute for a necessary survey. Site management needs a clear description of when specialist work will take place, how new findings will be handled and which areas remain unresolved.
Agree the approach during constructionThe Historical aerial photograph analysis provides findings from the documents assessed. The Baden-Württemberg KMBD states that its preliminary investigation generally applies to the underlying construction project. Check whether area changes or a changed task still correspond to the existing documents; current official guidance must be considered.
Where historical information is missing, the necessary research and aerial photograph analysis are commissioned for the specific area. Existing statements, map appendices and later investigation reports are brought together. For an area suspected of containing explosive ordnance in Stuttgart, describe which questions have already been answered and which remain to be investigated. Also draw the planned excavation boundaries, utility alignments and boreholes. For changed areas or construction tasks, further use of an older preliminary investigation is agreed with specialists and, where applicable, the KMBD before the works affected.
During a Surface survey, local measurement conditions must also be assessed. Terrain, accessibility and interfering installations may affect the conclusions. An area previously inaccessible must not appear as investigated in the results. Specialist planning determines whether another method or separate work is required.
Method selection follows the investigation objective, soil profile, existing utilities, metal installations and depth range required. For excavations, pile foundations, shoring and deep utility works, the respective starting points and end positions are described. Any required deep surveying or borehole clearance is assigned to the specific ground disturbance. The drawing states whether depth is measured from the present ground surface or a later working level. Limitations caused by inaccessible areas or interference remain visible in the analysis and results plan. The Surveying is matched to this investigation commission.
For inclined boreholes or anchors, state the direction and lateral extent as well as the starting elevation and final depth. The volume of ground needed for investigation may therefore extend beyond the area shown as a vertical excavation. Draw such ground disturbance in plan and section and identify the associated construction sections. For shafts, sumps or deeper foundation elements, identify additional low points individually. The specialist planner can then check which areas an existing investigation result covers and where supplementary work is needed before construction.
According to the DGUV, ordnance surveying during construction is not simply visual observation of excavator spoil. If investigation is to be combined with progressing earthworks, suitable prerequisites and a coordinated investigation sequence must be in place. Even when ground is being removed, the investigation method needs a technical justification.
For suitable excavation monitoring, the investigation sequence and earthworks are coordinated. Before the next section, site management must be able to identify which area was addressed with which method and what limitations remain. Changed excavation bases, deeper shafts or additional drilling are communicated to the specialist planner. During phased work, handover points are agreed with those responsible. A possible find leads to stopping the affected works and immediate notification through the responsible bodies.
Clearly identify the ground condition and elevation information used. The initial contact records the project and decision needed. The document review assigns existing explosive ordnance reports, statements and location appendices to the planned construction area and identifies missing supporting information.
Show base levels, low points and planned terrain changes together. Where supporting information is missing, historical research and aerial photograph analysis are scheduled. Method selection considers their results, the volume of ground needed and the area's measurement conditions.
Compare preliminary investigation and measurement conditions with the volume of ground needed. The commissioned surveying or suitable monitoring investigates the defined areas. Results are assessed together with their interpretation limits and assigned to the respective working levels and groundworks.
Investigation boundaries and reference levels are documented together in the report and site plan. The decision on subsequent steps identifies further investigations or coordination required before the next ground disturbance.
Handover includes the area addressed, investigation objective, method used and its limitations. Where ground elevations vary, it must also be clear which ground condition the depths refer to. Retain the associated plan revision with the report. For a later design change, the new works can then be compared with the area and depth actually investigated.
The private specialist contractor plans and documents the commissioned investigation services. The KMBD, based at the Stuttgart regional authority, performs its duties for Baden-Württemberg, particularly rendering ordnance safe, transport and destruction. FONTANA-EOD's technical report describes the area, depth and scope of work actually addressed. The responsible bodies make the necessary official decisions.
For tendering and award, individual work packages are described with their prerequisites: research and existing supporting information, technical investigation, analysis and required results documents. Use the same site plan and elevation information for quotations. State when preparatory demolition or earthworks take place and what access will be available afterwards. For work around existing structures, include known utilities, cellars, foundations and other installations in the documents. Mark outstanding details as such and complete them before the construction concerned. Any necessary area clearance and Recovery are coordinated with their working areas and those responsible.
We assess the planned groundworks against the available documents and their design revision. Before attending site, we agree with you what needs to be investigated, which areas are accessible and what findings are required. If the design or site conditions change, we check whether the agreed scope remains appropriate. The report states what was actually investigated and the limits of the findings. This allows designers and site management to see which findings they can use and where questions remain.
Discuss the investigation taskWe first establish the investigation objective: which question must it answer? We then select a technically suitable method. The availability of a particular device or experience on a similar neighbouring site is not enough to justify the choice of method on its own.
Inaccessible areas and limited conclusions are identified. They do not disappear into a total area figure. Designers and site management can then decide specifically which areas still need attention and when a suitable survey becomes possible.
A new location, additional depth or different construction method is compared with previous results. A familiar project name does not replace this comparison. Feedback is provided before the affected work so that an outstanding question can be included in the sequence.
The technical conclusion remains connected to its location references and appendices. A brief summary helps orientation but does not replace the documented survey scope. This basis is retained even if site management or contractors change.
Older and newer plans may use different elevation references. Record their origin and basis, and have specialists clarify any necessary conversions. A numerical value adopted without checking may make comparison between ground, planned excavation base and investigation scope difficult. A shared reference understood by everyone involved is decisive. When the elevation reference changes, the specialist planner clarifies comparison of the underlying information and records the investigation scope actually documented in a traceable way. Even if the property name remains unchanged, the investigated areas and depths are compared with the current construction project.
Understand investigation reports and their limitationsAn older statement may have described further investigation needs that were subsequently addressed. Also provide any later results available. Together, the documents show the question asked at the time and the scope actually investigated. For new works, these conclusions are compared with the current design.
Results handover includes the reference level used, the ground condition at the time of investigation and the associated plan version. If ground is later excavated or fill placed, earlier documents are retained with their original status. For additional low points, check whether they lie within the volume of ground documented as addressed. The project file holds these documents together with measurement data, assessment of findings and, where applicable, the clearance record. When handing over to new site management, pass on the report and location appendices together. The Clearance documentation records the area, depth and scope of work addressed.
Understand the service scope
Aerial photograph interpretation is related to the actual groundworks. Its purpose and geographical scope remain distinct from a technical investigation of the ground as it is today.
Understand aerial photograph assessment
The findings, their locations and limitations are handed over together. This makes clear to those carrying out the work which area has been investigated and which task remains outstanding.
Assess investigation reports


Historical assessment, technical investigation and further work answer different questions. In your enquiry, describe the planned groundworks and the findings needed for them. For projects in the industrial and infrastructure sector, add the operating conditions.
Compare services
Preparation connects the commission, site work and handover of findings. Changes to the project can then be incorporated into technical coordination in good time.
Process and documentationThe existing ground condition, proposed excavation bases and additional low points are helpful. State the respective reference level and send a clear section where levels differ. Mark uncertain or undecided details accordingly. Assemble the documents before planning the affected earthworks or drilling, and agree investigation needs with the specialist contractor and outstanding requirements with the responsible bodies. For preliminary investigation by the KMBD, the application and site plan are submitted in accordance with the official application documents.
No. The terrain model offered by the municipal surveying office describes elevations. A technical conclusion about an explosive ordnance investigation needs its own supporting information, a defined task and its documented result. The two types of information serve different purposes.
Terrain alone does not demonstrate explosive ordnance contamination. The specific findings available and planned ground disturbance must be clarified. Terrain may be relevant to accessibility and method planning, but on its own does not establish historical suspicion of explosive ordnance.
It remains an important document insofar as its scope of conclusions is traceable. Compare the area, reference level and volume of ground investigated with the new condition and next ground disturbance. Specialists decide from this comparison whether further investigations are required. Suitable methods and their limitations depend on the soil profile, installed structures, accessibility and depth range needed.
Stop the affected works, keep your distance and do not touch or move the object. Do not transport it to the police either. Call the police on 110 and follow their instructions. The police or local police authority involve the KMBD; its specialists handle the find.
Only if it clearly describes the entire ground disturbance. Different base levels and individual deeper structural elements should be assigned in the site plan and sections. The technical documentation records the areas, depths and reference levels actually investigated together with remaining limitations.
Mark the area affected and the reason for its inaccessibility. It remains distinguishable from the area actually investigated. Once access is possible, specialists define the further task according to the planned ground disturbance and investigation question still outstanding.
The work involved depends on research needs, area and depth scope, measurement conditions and access. Agreed analysis and documentation are added, together with further examination of findings where applicable. Identify existing statements and reports so that the quotation describes the specialist services actually needed. KMBD services and cost rates are considered separately from remuneration for private specialist commissions.
Include the site plan, sections, ground condition and planned base levels.
Pass on assessments and reports with their appendices.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.