Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.
For water and wastewater pipelines, we consider utility trenches, chambers, pumping stations and crossings separately by area and depth. FONTANA-EOD plans suitable surveys according to structure geometry, depth, existing utilities and dewatering. Send network and structure plans, cross-sections, depths and construction phases so that services and documentation can be defined before each ground intervention.
Identify utilities, chambers and installations.
Assess the trench, excavation and bore path.
Document investigated and unresolved areas.
Before water and sewer construction, existing hazard indications and planned ground interventions are used to clarify which explosive ordnance surveys are required. Utility trenches, property connections, chambers, pumping stations, stormwater basins and crossings are considered. Location, depth, excavation dimensions, shoring, dewatering and the actual civil engineering working volume are decisive.
The scope of work for “New drinking water pipeline Stolzenfels–Königsbach; Rhine cycle route expansion ( Koblenz ) Rhineland-Palatinate” included explosive ordnance surveys (before/during pipeline construction) – reported completed.
Service period: –
Service areas:Surface surveys: GPR, TDEM and magnetometry
Water and wastewater projects range from shallow property connections to deep sewer excavations. Chambers, pumping stations, stormwater installations and crossings change the area, depth and technical survey feasibility.
The explosive ordnance assessment follows the construction-ready utility and structure plans. Earlier existing routes or general road assessments are not indiscriminately extended to new, deeper or laterally displaced ground interventions.
Construction sections and network handovers are maintained in a shared location and status structure so that civil engineering, operations and later extensions use the same status of work.
The explosive ordnance assessment therefore follows more than the utility alignment alone. The standard trench, chamber, pumping station, launch and reception excavations, basin, slope and temporary work area are recorded separately according to their actual geometry and construction phase.

The volume of ground affected includes the utility route, trench, slopes or shoring, bedding, lateral assembly areas and connection points.
Nominal diameter, cover and construction method affect depth and working width.
The assessment geometry relates to the actual pipe trench and current design revision.
Assess the water pipeline trench
Gravity sewers may require deep trenches, wide shoring systems and extensive dewatering.
Excavation base depth, chamber spacing, gradient and working space change along the section.
Deep zones and zones subject to technical limitations are incorporated separately into the methodology.
Assess deep sewer sections
Chamber structures, wet wells, retention and overflow structures have larger footprints and complex foundations.
Piles, shoring, excavation bases, utility connections and ancillary areas are recorded separately.
The documentation follows the specific structural geometry, not just the sewer alignment.
Assess the chamber or installation structure
Short connection trenches often run between existing utilities, foundations, basements and traffic areas.
An earlier survey of the main route does not automatically cover connections that deviate laterally.
Location, depth and accessibility are assessed for each connection or infill corridor.
Assess property connections and network infill
Trenchless construction methods involve deep bore paths, launch and reception pits, intermediate structures and possible positional corridors.
Watercourses, roads and railway lines entail additional operator and construction phase requirements.
The entire volume of ground affected is described in three dimensions. Suitable methods are selected for its survey.
Assess the crossing and drilling corridor
Renewal of existing utilities, sewer replacement, diversion and urgent repairs involve ground altered by repeated construction.
Time pressure does not change the technical need to clarify suspected hazards, the volume of ground affected and responsibilities.
Existing reports are checked against the new depth, location and construction method before reuse.
Check existing documentation for the new ground interventionWater and wastewater projects develop from network concepts and route corridors to specific pipe trenches, chambers and structures. The explosive ordnance assessment is updated as the design becomes more detailed.
Municipal clients, network operations, designers and site management need clear section, depth and documentation boundaries so that construction and operational decisions are not conflated.
Dewatering, shoring, existing utilities and changing excavation base depths can alter accessibility during construction. Areas inaccessible in advance are marked on the plan. Suitable supplementary methods and later survey access are assessed for them.
Historical baseline data are related to possible routes, structure locations and sensitive crossings.
The early assessment supports option selection, prioritisation and procurement of further documents.
The early assessment clarifies further survey requirements. Any necessary technical survey relates to the utility alignment selected later.
Assess utility route options using historical evidenceThe utility alignment, trench cross-section, chambers, pumping stations, property connections and crossings are described as specific assessment areas.
Existing asset plans and setting out must use the same location references.
Design changes are checked against the existing work status.
Coordinate the construction route with specialistsBoreholes, probing and groundwater monitoring points involve ground intervention before the main construction work.
Coordinates, target depth, equipment access and utility clearance are linked to explosive ordnance assessment requirements.
Changes to point lists are documented with the design revision and date.
Assess investigation points in advanceAreas, depths, shoring, dewatering, methods, hold points and required documents are clearly specified in the tender.
Generic items without structure or section references make costing and acceptance more difficult.
Supplementary services receive clear trigger criteria.
Define service specifications and investigation recordsExisting utilities, chambers, made ground and structures can limit surveys in advance.
For remaining areas, the technical suitability of explosive ordnance detection during construction is assessed. Each working layer is technically surveyed and assessed before controlled removal in layers with supplementary visual inspection follows. These steps are repeated until the agreed excavation base is reached.
The status applies only to the volume of ground actually supervised.
Prepare investigation work during constructionSurvey anomalies and exposed objects are documented with location, depth and construction conditions.
If an unexpected suspicious object is found, work stops immediately and the competent authorities are notified without delay.
Resumption of work follows the instructions of the competent authorities.
Document anomalies and responsibilitiesThe historical situation, technical survey feasibility and actual civil engineering cross-section are assessed separately. Suitable surveys are then selected for each section.
A shallow water pipeline section may require different methods from a deep sewer, pumping station or trenchless crossing.
An assessment of a shallow drinking water trench cannot be extended to a deep chamber or guided pipe jacking works. Project documents and survey documentation must clearly distinguish these volumes of ground.
Aerial photographs, maps, archives and existing project documents are related to the utility alignment and structure areas.
Suspected hazard areas and data gaps are shown by section.
The result defines priorities for technical investigation.
Clarify suspected hazards along the pipelineAn area-wide geophysical investigation may be useful on sufficiently clear areas.
Methods and survey grids depend on the target object, depth, ground conditions and surface.
Interference zones remain visible on the site plan. Suitable supplementary methods and survey access are assessed for them.
Select area-based methods for the trenchSewers, pipes, cables, chambers, reinforcement and vehicles can obscure survey data.
Known installations identified in existing asset plans and site investigations are incorporated into the assessment.
Areas where data cannot be evaluated adequately are shown on the plan. Suitable supplementary methods and survey access are assessed for them.
Assess existing installations and interference areasExcavations, piles, shoring alignments and deep excavation bases may extend beyond the near-surface area covered by surveys.
Point, linear and volume geometries are described with target depth and construction method.
The documentation remains limited to this geometry.
Investigate deep structural areasShoring, existing utilities, made ground or lack of access can limit surveys in advance.
For the remaining volume of ground, the technical suitability of explosive ordnance surveying during construction is assessed. Each layer is technically surveyed and evaluated before controlled removal with supplementary visual inspection. These steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base.
Depths not supervised remain outside the assessment.
Coordinate excavation sequence and inspection stepsThe plan, survey data, point status, findings, limitations and outstanding measures are brought together for each section and structure.
Partial handovers describe the area, depth and design revision.
Later extensions can be linked specifically to this status.
Define section status and handoverThe documentation links the network plan, construction section, utility and structure geometry, fieldwork and next project decision.
It must remain understandable for both the ongoing construction site and later network operations, rehabilitation and extensions.
For network operators and site management, utility chainage, chamber identifiers, target and actual depths, construction sections and work status are maintained in a shared structure. This keeps emergency redesign and additional connections traceable.
In combined, stormwater and foul sewer systems, immediately neighbouring sewer lengths may have different invert depths, cross-sections and construction methods. Work status is therefore recorded not just by street or construction section but also by sewer length, chamber and special structure. A design change can thus be checked to identify the volume at depth already covered and the volume requiring reassessment.
For later maintenance and network operations, it is also documented whether an area received only historical assessment, was technically surveyed, was supervised during excavation or was fully addressed as a structure. These status categories are recorded separately so that a later repair or new connection does not inadvertently rely on a broader assessment than the original service actually provides.
The drinking water pipeline, sewer, chambers, pumping station, stormwater installation, crossings and ancillary areas are recorded with clear geometry.
Design revisions and alignment changes remain traceable.
Operational status and assessment status are not confused.
Aerial photographs, maps, known finds, existing correspondence and historical records are documented with their source and scope.
Data gaps remain visible.
The historical assessment relates to the current ground intervention.
Methods, grid, point coordinates, assessment depths, ground conditions, water, surface, existing utilities and interference sources are recorded by section.
Areas actually reached remain distinguishable from target values.
Departures are explained.
Survey anomalies, technical sources of interference, exposures and actual finds receive stable identifiers.
Location, depth, assessment and follow-up measure remain linked.
Changes are updated.
Inaccessible areas, utility bundles, shoring, structures and depths not reached are mapped.
A next technical step is defined for each zone.
The final assessment is not extended beyond these boundaries.
Reports, site plans, status lists, findings and outstanding measures are brought together for each construction section and the overall project.
The handover identifies the area and volume at depth actually addressed.
Later network works can specifically check this status.
The project records contain historical evidence, utility and structure plans, survey data, deep intervention points, findings and partial handovers.
Consistent identifiers and design revisions allow later rehabilitation or extensions to be checked against the original scope of work.
Utility alignments, chambers, pumping stations, stormwater installations, crossings and ancillary areas receive clear geometries.
This structure links planning, fieldwork and network operations.
The design revisions, existing asset plans and survey data used, together with their currency, are documented.
Departures between the plan and site locations remain identifiable.
Survey lines, grids, borehole locations, ground investigation points and verification areas receive stable identifiers.
Raw data, evaluations and project decisions remain attributable.
Each anomaly and outstanding zone is assigned a work status, result and follow-up measure.
Site management and network operations can thereby identify outstanding prerequisites for each section.
Areas are handed over with the design revision, depth, method and limitations.
Commissioning and technical conclusions remain separate in their functions.
Section reports, maps, registers and conclusions are brought together in an updatable project file. Following actual exposure or clearance work, the corresponding findings and clearance records are included.
Later connections and rehabilitation can add specifically to the existing status.
The work follows the design revision, structural geometry and civil engineering phase. Required results are coordinated with procurement and ground intervention dates.
Linear utility sections, deep chambers and trenchless crossings are addressed separately and then linked in shared project records.
For long network sections, sewer lengths, chambers and special installations are arranged in a reliable construction sequence. Each handover status includes the utility alignment, chamber identifier, depth addressed, inaccessible zones and the technical follow-up measure required for the next construction stage.
The utility type, route, chambers, installations, crossings, construction sections and required decision are described.
Early planning areas and areas ready for construction receive different levels of assessment detail.
Site plans, historical evidence, existing utilities, ground investigation data and point lists are related to a consistent coordinate system.
Missing or conflicting baseline information is recorded for each section.
Historical suspected hazard areas are overlaid with the utility trench, chambers and installation areas.
This identifies technical assessment areas and data gaps.
Area-based surveys, deep intervention points, later access and work during construction are selected according to the construction method.
Shoring and dewatering are incorporated into the sequence. Necessary surveys and protective measures are planned before ground intervention during dismantling, exposure of utilities or creation of a working platform.
Surveys, depth-specific assessments or supplementary investigations are carried out with section and structure identifiers.
Interference zones and departures are updated immediately within the project geometry.
Readings and field observations are assessed for plausibility against the basis for suspicion, existing utilities and planned depth.
Unresolved points receive a specific further measure.
The report, plan, status register and limitations are provided for civil engineering, site management and network operations.
The next work step relates to the documented scope of work.
New chambers, changed alignments, additional connections or deeper interventions are checked against the existing assessment.
Necessary supplementary work is documented as a new work step.
The utility alignment alone does not fully describe the ground intervention relevant to explosive ordnance. The trench base, working width, shoring, chamber excavations, crossings and installation areas determine the assessment geometry.
Shallow areas, deep areas and areas accessible only during construction are recorded separately so that each method is used only within its actual scope.
Water pipelines and sewers differ in depth, gradient, nominal diameter, bedding and construction method. Slopes, shoring, dewatering and adjacent utilities change the accessible area and subsequent excavation geometry.
Chambers, pumping stations, stormwater basins and crossings are treated as separate structures. Piles, sheet piles, deep excavation bases and bore paths need separate point, linear or volume references.
For rehabilitation around existing infrastructure, we check whether existing reports cover the same volume of ground and depth. Earlier utility installation alone is insufficient evidence for new or deeper interventions.
For gravity sewers, invert depths along each sewer length are recorded in the longitudinal section; chambers and special structures extend the working volume laterally. The technical assessment must therefore represent the longitudinal section and site plan together. For pipe jacking, the launch and reception shafts and the deep drilling or jacking corridor are each considered separately.
Repairs and renewals during continued operation often require temporary utility routes, bypasses or additional work pits. These temporary areas are incorporated into explosive ordnance planning where earthworks, anchors, pump sumps or equipment positions involving ground intervention are planned.
Chainage, construction section, utility type and design revision form the shared spatial reference.
Transitions between sections are documented continuously.
Excavation depth, trench width, slopes or shoring, bedding and working spaces determine the area-based assessment geometry.
Gradients and depth changes are recorded in the longitudinal section.
Plan dimensions, excavation base depth, foundations, wet well, shoring and utility connections are described as a separate construction area.
Deep individual ground interventions receive separate coordinates.
The launch and reception pits, bore path, duct, reaming and possible positional deviations form a three-dimensional working volume.
A near-surface survey is sufficient only where it actually covers the required volume at depth.
Old sewers, pipes, cables, chambers, reinforcement and vehicles can obscure survey data.
Known installations are documented spatially and considered when selecting methods.
Wells, filters, drains, pump sumps and shoring involve additional ground interventions and change accessibility.
Assessment planning follows the actual construction and dewatering phase.

Water and wastewater routes often follow existing roads, altered made ground or municipal infrastructure corridors with dense utilities. Metal installations, sewers, chambers, foundations and previous excavations can limit individual survey methods.
Select surveys according to technical installations
Deep sewer trenches and chamber structures differ considerably from near-surface water connections or open utility sections. Each geometry needs its own assessment even though it belongs to the same network project.
Determine suitable methods for trenches and structuresThe methods detect different physical properties and cover different volumes at depth. Their combination follows suspected hazards, existing utilities, structures and actual accessibility.
Assesses possible suspected hazard areas along utility routes and installation areas.
It does not establish which objects are present in the ground today.
Detects ferromagnetic anomalies in accessible areas and open route sections.
Sewers, utilities, reinforcement and vehicles can limit survey feasibility.
Measures electromagnetic responses from conductive objects and can provide supplementary information in suitable areas.
Ground conditions, target object, moisture and technical infrastructure determine the scope of assessment.
Can show layers, utility structures and distinct reflection zones beneath suitable surfaces.
A reflection does not automatically identify explosive ordnance; the depth of usable data and evaluation depend on site conditions.
Assesses chambers, pumping stations, shoring locations, piles, bore paths and deep ground investigation points.
The documentation applies to the recorded point or corridor geometry.
Where explosive ordnance detection during construction is technically suitable, each working layer is surveyed and evaluated using technical methods. Controlled removal in layers and supplementary visual inspection then follow; these steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base.
Excavation layers, stopping points, authority to give instructions, communication procedures and documentation are defined in the work instruction before work begins. Merely watching the excavator at work is insufficient.
Water and wastewater projects combine linear trenches with deep structures and changing construction conditions. Designers, the specialist contractor and site management therefore coordinate survey areas, access and dates.
Each section receives a status clearly describing geometry, depth, method, construction phase and outstanding areas.
FONTANA-EOD relates suspected hazards and surveys to the pipeline, sewer, chamber, pumping station or crossing. A general road or property assessment is not extended to different depths.
Methods are selected according to the survey objective and site conditions. Water, ground conditions, existing utilities, shoring and technical installations inform the suitability assessment.
Changes to alignment, depth, structure or construction phase are checked against the existing work status. Additional volumes of ground receive a documented supplementary assessment.
Anomalies, remaining areas and construction interruptions are communicated with stable identifiers and clear responsibilities.
The handover records which areas and depths have been surveyed and which tasks remain outstanding before the next civil engineering or installation construction step.
In water and wastewater construction, departures from existing asset plans often become fully apparent only after surfaces are opened or existing utilities exposed. If this changes the trench alignment, chamber position or shoring geometry, the new volume of ground is checked against existing documentation before work continues.
The trench, chamber, pumping station and crossing are described in full before method selection.
Utility and sewer plans are assessed for location, currency and relevance to the work.
Piles, shoring, chambers and bore paths receive their own assessment geometries.
Dismantling, shoring, dewatering and changed accessibility are incorporated into the project records.
Hold points, reporting procedures and local responsibilities are defined before fieldwork.
The report and plans remain usable for site management, network operations and later extensions.
Trenchless methods, inverted siphons, thrust boring and HDD crossings involve launch and reception pits and deep corridors. A near-surface assessment along the alignment covers these volumes only where survey reach and geometry demonstrably match.
Using this information, FONTANA-EOD describes the areas and depths to be surveyed and the documentation needed for each construction section. The final documentation shows the areas and depths addressed, areas remaining outstanding and the next technical step before ground intervention.
Water and wastewater projects bring together network operators, local authorities, designers, site management, civil engineering contractors, specialist contractors and locally responsible authorities. Roles and information channels are defined for each construction section.
Define the network works, construction sections, priorities, programme and documentation required.
They provide existing network and project data and commission the necessary specialist services.
Translates the project into the alignment, trench, chambers, installations, crossings, ground investigation points and construction phases.
Design changes are communicated with the revision and spatial effects.
Coordinates explosive ordnance assessment with access, dewatering, shoring, utility changeovers, concurrent trades and partial handovers.
Outstanding areas and hold points remain visible in the project status.
Constructs trenches, chambers, pumping stations, crossings and ancillary areas according to the agreed design revision.
Departures from the utility alignment, excavation base depth, chamber location or construction method are compared with the existing status of work before work continues.
Assesses suspected hazards and method suitability, carries out the commissioned survey and documents the result, limitations and further measures.
The assessment remains limited to the agreed volume of ground and design revision.
In Germany, the ordnance disposal services of the federal states and the locally competent authorities carry out hazard-response and find-management duties. Their involvement is established for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.
The local public order authority and, where applicable, building control are involved according to their project responsibilities. Conditions and contacts are assigned to the actual sewer lengths, chambers and installations; reporting procedures are defined before work begins.
The activity, project location, excavation depth, operational status and possible finds determine the organisational framework. The specification, risk assessment and responsibilities relate to the sewer length, chamber or installation area.
Technical rules for trenches, shoring, dewatering and network operations supplement explosive ordnance planning; tasks remain distinguishable through clear area, depth and documentation boundaries.
In Germany, § 7 SprengG concerns the commercial authorisation for activities requiring authorisation; § 20 SprengG concerns the certificate of competence of responsible persons. Under § 1b SprengG, searching for found munitions also counts as handling them. The requirements applicable to the project depend on the activity actually commissioned and the allocation of responsibilities.
The risk assessment links deep trenches, shoring, dewatering, existing utilities, heavy equipment, working spaces, escape routes and communication with the explosive ordnance approach.
DGUV Information 201-027 supports risk assessment and protective measures for explosive ordnance clearance work. The Baufachliche Richtlinien Kampfmittelräumung contain requirements for historical and technical investigation, clearance concepts, procurement and documentation within their defined federal remit. Their application to the specific water and wastewater project is clarified separately.
If an unexpected suspicious object is encountered, stop work in the affected area immediately. Do not touch, move or continue to expose the object. Leave the danger area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting procedure. The responsible authorities determine the next steps. Then inform site management and those responsible for the network.
Network operational authorisation, construction acceptance and authority decisions on finds serve different purposes and are recorded separately in the project records.
Drinking water hygiene, wastewater operations, dewatering and explosive ordnance risk assessment fulfil different tasks. The project organisation links these requirements without deriving a broader assessment of areas or depths not surveyed from operational authorisation.
The First Ordinance to the Explosives Act (1. SprengV) includes requirements concerning specialist competence and state-recognised training courses. For water and wastewater networks, the required qualification is matched to the specific survey or clearance commission.
DGUV Rule 113-003 concerns the dismantling or destruction of explosives or corresponding objects and also includes the disposal of found munitions. It applies according to this field of activity; it does not replace a risk assessment specific to the planned ground intervention.
The company, responsible individuals and specific task must be compatible.
The trench, shoring, water, utilities, equipment, personnel and reporting procedures are assessed by section.
Suspected hazards, the clearance objective, method, quality and basis for acceptance are described before civil engineering work.
The utility section, depth, findings, limitations and further measures remain traceable.
The construction section, utility or structure geometry, qualifications, data format and required documentation are clearly described.
Supplementary services receive a technical trigger and a verifiable billing basis.
Access, utility clearance, setting out, shoring, dewatering, work areas and contacts are checked against the current design revision.
Changes are incorporated into the task before mobilisation.
Stop work immediately, do not touch, move or further expose the object, leave the immediate area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, the local emergency reporting procedure applies.
The responsible authorities determine the next steps when a find is encountered. Site management and those responsible for the network receive location references and the instructions applicable to the section.
The project documents link the utility alignment, longitudinal section, chambers, pumping stations, deep intervention points and construction progress. Plans and status lists refer to the same construction revision and volume of ground affected.
Historical assessment, technical assessment, excavation supervision and investigation of findings remain technically separate and are brought together traceably for the specific network section.
The network overview assigns sewer lengths, chambers, pumping stations, basins and pipe jacking areas to their respective area and depth status.
Assess the water and sewer network within the utility project
Suspected hazard areas are related to the utility alignment, chamber locations and installation areas; unclear areas receive a specific follow-up assessment.
Review historical indications along the network route
For deep sewer lengths, chambers and pipe jacking corridors, the documentation records the assessment volume, depth reached, technical conditions and outstanding areas.
Survey chambers and installations at the relevant depths
Only the trench layers, chamber excavations and accessible bases actually supervised form part of the construction-phase assessment.
Supervise sewer and utility trench excavation
Field observations, technical sources of interference, explosive ordnance findings and further work requirements are assigned separately through sewer length, chamber or installation identifiers.
Assign findings to the network section traceably
The project records summarise network geometry, specialist services carried out, assessment limits and necessary follow-up steps for each construction section.
Document section reports and handover

Historical hazard assessment, depth-specific assessment, work during construction, communication about findings and project records are clearly assigned to the affected utility, chamber or installation section.
The next technical step follows from the network type, gradient, chamber depth, construction method, surrounding installations and the date by which a reliable decision is needed.
Plan ordnance assessments for transport, utility, energy and other infrastructure projects according to their ground interventions.
Have the project surroundings assessed by specialists
Distinguish utility corridors, crossings, foundations and installation areas by construction method and intervention depth.
Assess utility and energy project requirements
Evaluate historical indications and data gaps along the planned water or wastewater route.
Clarify historical suspicion indicators
Prepare surveys for deep chambers, pumping stations, crossings and ground investigation points.
Assess deep spaces affected by the works
Establish the suitability and sequence of construction-phase ordnance surveying for remaining excavation areas.
Prepare the excavation sequence
Coordinate recovery of confirmed ordnance with the permitted activities and local responsibilities.
Coordinate the processing of findings
Prepare the specification, data formats and section handovers for water and sewer construction.
Prepare tendering and documentation
Take account of the project location, federal state and local interfaces for planning and communication about finds on water and wastewater pipelines.
Understand regional responsibilities
Submit network plans, structure plans and schedules for a project assessment.
Have your water or sewer project assessed
Water and wastewater networks differ in alignment, depth and structures. Drinking water pipelines mainly operate under pressure; in gravity sewers, invert depths follow the ground and utility alignment; chambers and low points are recorded separately. Pumping stations, stormwater basins, storage sewers and pipe jacking extend the linear utility volume through separate excavations and foundations.
For spatial referencing, the project location and section and chamber identifiers are linked to the current utility plan. Responsible project parties and existing requirements remain assigned to each structure.
Check whether the survey volume and documented depth also cover the shoring, chamber widening and dewatering for the planned construction stage. The alignment of a surveyed utility alone does not describe these additional volumes of ground.
Check evidence against the interventionChanged property connections, excavation base depths or launch pits are compared with previous results. Record the changed design revision and affected construction sections so that supplementary surveys can be clarified before each ground intervention.
Explore the technical principlesTechnical information
Utility routes, substations and energy installations place different demands on ordnance assessment. The brochure shows the design information needed and how investigation, construction sequence and documentation fit together.

Before each construction section, network operators, local authorities and site management need information on surveyed areas and outstanding tasks. Utility type, structural geometry, depth, existing installations and actual construction conditions remain decisive.
The assessment should begin as soon as the utility alignment, structures and main construction methods are reliably described. Before ground investigation, water or sewer trenches, chambers, pumping stations and trenchless crossings, the specific volumes of ground affected must be defined by location and depth.
Drinking water pipelines, gravity sewers, chambers and pumping stations may require different trench and excavation depths. Depth, shoring, dewatering and the volume of ground affected determine the suitable explosive ordnance assessment.
Plan dimensions, excavation base depth, foundations, shoring, piles and utility connections are recorded as a separate structural geometry. The area-based or depth-specific surveys required are defined according to suspected hazards, the construction method and survey conditions.
Pipes, sewers, cables, chambers, reinforcement and vehicles can affect surveys and restrict access. Existing asset plans are checked against site conditions. Zones where data cannot be evaluated adequately are identified on the plan. Suitable supplementary methods and survey access are assessed for them.
If an unexpected suspicious object is found, stop work. Do not touch, move or uncover it further. Leave the immediate area and warn others without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting procedure. The competent authorities determine what happens next; a project enquiry does not replace reporting the find.
For areas that have not been fully investigated in advance, the technical suitability of explosive ordnance detection during construction is assessed. Each working layer is technically surveyed and assessed before controlled removal in layers with supplementary visual inspection follows. These steps are repeated until the agreed excavation base is reached. Excavation layers, instruction procedures, stopping points and documentation are established before work begins. Areas not covered remain unresolved.
Helpful documents include site and network plans, utility type, construction sections, trench cross-sections, chambers, pumping stations, crossings, maximum depths, ground investigation points, existing utilities, historical assessments, construction schedules and the desired documentation objective.
Information and requirements from authorities are supplied with their date, complete appendices and geographical scope. In Germany, the competent ordnance disposal service, local public-order authority and, where relevant, building-control authority are identified for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.
Factors include route length, trench depth, number and size of chambers, structure and crossing geometry, utility density, ground conditions, dewatering, accessibility, required methods, evaluation and documentation scope. Clear quantities and design revisions enable reliable costing.
An initial enquiry can be based on preliminary or outline design. It should identify the utility type, priority sections, typical depths, structures, crossings and next decision deadline.
For network programmes lasting several years, clear section and design naming is important so that later rehabilitation and connections can build on the existing status of work.
For network works comprising several parts, priorities, construction sections, planned shutdowns and operational handovers should be identified. This allows explosive ordnance work to be phased so that urgent sewer lengths or structures receive a usable decision basis first.
Existing CCTV surveys, as-built profiles, chamber measurements and ground investigation documents can also support spatial assessment. They do not replace explosive ordnance assessment but help describe depth changes, structural dimensions and practically accessible work areas more precisely before deployment.
Send site or network plans showing the alignment, chainage, construction sections, land parcels and design revision.
Mark outstanding route options, lateral connections and areas outside the standard trench.
Where several lots are involved, the intended section identifier should be identifiable.
Describe the utility type, trench cross-section, excavation base depth, shoring, chambers, pumping stations, stormwater installations, thrust boring and HDD areas.
State plan dimensions, depths, bore paths, piles and ground investigation points.
Dewatering and temporary installations are considered as separate ground interventions.
Include utility and sewer plans, historical documents, ground investigation and groundwater data, earlier reports and known interference zones.
Specify construction schedules, access, traffic management, data formats and handover dates.
State whether the document is needed for planning, procurement, site management or network operations.
For an initial assessment, a site plan, utility type, typical and maximum depths, structures, planned period and existing hazard information are often sufficient.
Using your documents, FONTANA-EOD assesses which investigations are needed for the individual construction sections.
Quantities, point lists, access, construction stages, data formats and required documentation are then specified for costing and construction.
For the initial assessment, utility type, nominal diameter, chainage, excavation base depths, chamber lists, construction methods and the existing network are particularly important. For rehabilitation, it is also clarified which areas are already open, built over or technically affected by existing installations.
For projects with several sewer lengths, chamber groups or installation sites, the intended construction sequence should also be stated. This helps identify which sections need a complete assessment basis early and which areas can be reliably surveyed only after dismantling, utility exposure or creation of a new working platform. Necessary surveys and protective measures are also planned before these preparatory ground interventions.
Alignment, chainage, construction sections, design revision and land parcel references.
Trenches, chambers, pumping stations, crossings, piles and maximum depth.
Utilities, sewers, shoring, dewatering, surface and accessibility.
Document for planning, procurement, site management, network operations or the project file.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.