Two people with a survey trolley on a road construction site beside an existing carriageway.

Explosive ordnance detection for noise barriers

For a noise barrier, both the long construction strip and individual pile, drilling and foundation points must be considered. FONTANA-EOD uses the alignment drawing and foundation schedule to assess which investigations are needed before drilling, driving and excavation. Send the wall alignment, point schedule, target depths and working windows so that the investigation scope can be specified taking account of indications of suspected ordnance and existing utilities.

Define the alignment

Assign chainage and the working strip.

Assess the foundation

Coordinate piles, foundations and depth.

Document the section

Document the points investigated.

Investigation before foundation work

Which investigations the planned foundations require

Before foundation work and earthworks for a noise barrier, investigation requirements are established using existing indications of suspected ordnance and the alignment and foundation drawings. Piles, strip foundations, plinths and utility trenches are considered by location, depth and installation method. Utilities, safety barriers, existing foundations and traffic affect accessibility and the suitability of survey methods. Results remain tied to the wall sections and foundation points investigated; supplementary work is planned for areas not adequately covered.

Project references

Selected project examples

Explosive ordnance detection – Wetter (Ruhr) – noise barrier, railway/tramway project Wetter (Ruhr) / Germany · Arnsberg administrative district

The scope of services for “Wetter (Ruhr) – noise barrier, railway/tramway project Wetter (Ruhr) / Germany · Arnsberg administrative district” comprised downhole magnetometry.

Service period: 2026-07

Service areas:Downhole magnetometry / deep-ground survey

View project details · Deep-ground and downhole surveys · Region: Arnsberg administrative district

Construction sections and foundations

Distinguish pile points, plinths and ancillary works on the drawing

The wall alignment, pile points, plinths, utility trenches and assembly areas form different intervention geometries. Investigation is organised so that each working volume receives its own conclusion and clear documentation.

Person beside a survey instrument on a construction site; a wheeled excavator with drilling equipment stands behind them.

Tubular steel piles and driven piles

Impact and vibratory driving transfer substantial energy into the ground. For each pile, coordinates, installation cross-section, target depth and the necessary safety zone are related to suspected ordnance conditions.

An area measurement covers a pile only if the documented investigation actually includes its required location and depth. Relocated or additional piles are checked against the documented investigation area before construction.

Deployment planning also establishes whether pre-drilling, guide templates or temporary working platforms create further ground interventions.

Investigate pile points and depth
Person beside a survey instrument on a construction site; a wheeled excavator with drilling equipment stands behind them.

Bored piles and micropiles

Bore diameter, drilling depth, casing, drilling method and entry point determine the volume to be investigated. Existing foundations and utilities may limit drilling and survey geometry.

The point schedule, surveying and survey report must use the same identifiers so that subsequent construction remains unambiguously assigned.

Where pile lengths vary, investigation depth is derived from the current foundation schedule rather than assumed from a typical point.

Prepare drilling points with specialist input
Person with a tablet at the edge of a cordoned-off excavation, with an excavator behind.

Shallow foundations and plinths

For socket foundations, plinths and strip foundations, the focus is on excavation area, foundation depth and working space. Accessible areas can be investigated across their extent in advance.

For interference zones or inaccessible edge areas, it is assessed whether later exposure, supplementary surveying or explosive ordnance detection during construction is suitable for the planned ground intervention.

The foundation section is compared with the subsequent formwork and assembly area so that edge and working zones do not inadvertently remain unresolved.

Coordinate excavation areas
Survey trolley on an undeveloped construction site, with soil piles and a row of trees in the background.

Utility and drainage corridors

Cables, drainage, lighting or control lines often run parallel to the wall alignment and extend the actual working volume. Crossings and chambers create additional changes in depth.

Existing utilities are compared with the wall alignment on the drawing so that surveying and subsequent earthworks are not related to different alignments or drawing revisions.

Crossings and chambers receive their own section identifiers because their geometry often differs from the linear wall alignment.

Have a utility corridor assessed
Two people discussing plans at a table beside a vehicle on a construction site.

Slopes and restricted access

Slope inclination, safety barriers, traffic space, vegetation and existing structures may restrict equipment movement and surveying. Subareas are planned according to actual accessibility.

Zones that cannot be surveyed adequately remain visible on the site plan. The possible investigation date and suitable method are established for them.

Practical survey planning also considers equipment safety, hillside location and the ability to reach points from a stable working position.

Establish access and documentation
Two people discussing plans at a table beside a vehicle on a construction site.

Phased construction

Long noise barriers are often constructed in construction sections or closure periods. Each section needs a reliable status for documents, surveying, unresolved items and handover.

Design, fieldwork and installation use the same chainage and an updated point schedule. This makes omitted or changed points identifiable.

Before each partial handover, the as-constructed drawing revision is compared with the point and section schedule investigated.

Structure section handovers
Decisions as the project progresses

What information must be established before planning, procurement and construction

Explosive ordnance investigation is linked to the project's decision date. Information needed early differs from the documentation required immediately before piling or excavation.

Preliminary design and route selection

In early planning, the wall alignment, alternatives, available working width and historically identified areas of suspected ordnance are compared. Foundation types not yet decided are marked as planning assumptions.

The result shows which sections need further historical clarification or technical preliminary investigation.

Alternatives are assessed not only by wall location but also by accessibility for surveying, survey equipment and subsequent foundation equipment.

Delineate the corridor of suspected ordnance

Foundation design

Once the pile or foundation type is established, the point schedule, target depth, diameter, installation method and safety zone are refined.

These details are used to assess whether the entire subsequent foundation volume can be investigated and which method is suitable.

A complete foundation design also identifies special points at wall ends, offsets, doors, culverts and connections to structures.

Define foundation geometry

Tendering and costing

The service area, number of points, depth, surveying, working windows, interference sources, data formats and documentation required under the contract are clearly described.

Provisional items receive a technical trigger so that it is clear when they are needed and which services tenders include.

The costing basis distinguishes standard services from technically triggered additional measures such as replacement boreholes or anomaly investigation.

Prepare the service specification

Site preparation

Vegetation, safety barriers, site establishment, existing elements and traffic management affect accessibility. Before deployment, it is established which areas are actually surveyable and safely accessible.

Deviations from the planned condition are incorporated into the survey and construction sequence before work starts.

Clearing the working area, surface preparation and utility marking are coordinated with the survey sequence. Necessary investigations and protective measures are planned before ground disturbance during vegetation clearance, demolition or breaking out; later survey access is assigned its own investigation date.

Coordinate the working area

Ongoing construction

If pile positions, the wall alignment, foundation type or construction sequence change, it is checked whether the existing documentation covers the new working volume.

For altered points or depths, it is assessed whether supplementary investigations are needed. Neighbouring results are not automatically sufficient.

Site management receives a clear procedure for short-notice point relocations so that no uninvestigated foundation is installed under time pressure.

Compare design changes with the documentation status

Acceptance and project file

The report, point schedule, site plan, findings, limitations and outstanding measures are assigned to the section actually constructed.

Documentation must remain traceable after wall installation and must not be interpreted beyond the area and depth volume investigated.

For later maintenance or replacement work, the foundation points and ancillary areas originally investigated remain documented.

Specify the final documentation
From initial conditions to a measure

Select the method according to foundations and survey conditions

The next investigation depends on existing evidence and the planned ground intervention. Historical suspicion, technical measurements and actual findings are assessed separately and then related to the proposed ground intervention.

Spatial extent of suspected ordnance not yet established

Historical aerial photographs, maps, previous land uses and existing opinions are related to the planned wall alignment and construction sections.

The next step is a spatially substantiated assessment of suspected ordnance with a recommendation for technical investigation.

The historical assessment is versioned with the drawing revision so that a later shift in alignment does not inadvertently fall outside the corridor considered.

Accessible near-surface working strip

Open, adequately prepared areas can be investigated using a suitable geophysical method. Ground, target object and interference conditions determine the method.

The result describes survey coverage, anomalies, limitations and required point-specific or deep investigations.

Area measurements are limited to the width actually accessible on foot or by vehicle; shielded areas and interruptions appear on the results drawing.

Deep pile or drilling points

The subsequent installation volume is defined by coordinates, geometry and target depth. First, it is checked whether the required location and depth have already been adequately investigated. Any necessary supplementary deep investigation is related to the entire relevant geometry.

Point-specific documents show which foundations were investigated and which changes trigger supplementary work.

If a borehole survey is needed, the distance between the survey borehole and the subsequent pile is also technically justified and recorded in the point documentation.

Existing area with strong interference

Metal installations, existing walls, safety systems and utilities can obscure survey data. The limitation is described spatially and is not treated as a result without anomalies.

For these areas, it is assessed which method is suitable after possible demolition or from another access position. Explosive ordnance detection during construction also requires technical suitability for the ground intervention.

The later demolition or excavation stage is identified in advance so that supplementary services can be included in the construction programme in good time.

Anomalous survey point or find location

A technical anomaly is first checked against known structural elements, utilities and neighbouring data. If further clarification is needed, follow-up investigation is planned for the specific location.

Exposure, clearance or recovery is carried out within the activity and responsibility framework required for that work.

Responsible persons and dates are specified for further investigation of survey anomalies. If an unexpected suspicious object is encountered, work is stopped immediately and the responsible authorities are notified without delay.

Subarea already investigated

Existing reports are checked against drawing revision, wall alignment, point schedule, depth and actual construction. An earlier investigation may be usable if the entire present working volume is covered.

For changed or additional foundations, it is assessed whether supplementary investigations are required.

The applicability of an older report is assessed particularly carefully if the ground surface, fill or wall alignment has changed since the investigation.

Evidence for construction management and the project file

What documents establish the investigation status of the noise barrier

Usable documentation links historical evidence, wall alignment, foundation points, survey conditions, findings and follow-up measures. Each conclusion remains limited to the area actually investigated.

Project and alignment reference

The project designation, road, construction section, chainage, wall alignment, coordinate system and current drawing revision form the spatial basis.

Changes during construction are updated with dates and responsibilities.

The spatial reference is written consistently in all schedules and drawings to prevent chainage errors between design and construction.

Foundation and pile schedule

Each pile, borehole point or foundation section receives a unique identifier with target depth, diameter and installation method.

The point schedule must match surveying, survey data and subsequent construction.

Typical and special points are distinguished because wall ends, structural connections and changes in level often have different depths.

Suspected ordnance and existing-condition data

Historical assessment, utility drawings, existing structures, earlier surveys and known finds are documented with their scope.

Contradictions or missing documents remain visible as unresolved clarification items.

Known technical installations are assessed according to their data quality; an unverified as-built drawing does not automatically establish a reliable location.

Survey and field conditions

Method, grid, borehole geometry, surface condition, accessibility, ground, interference sources and working windows are described for each section.

Only this allows a specialist assessment of the significance of results.

Weather, surface preparation and equipment position are recorded where they affect survey quality or access to individual points.

Findings and limitations

Anomalies, known interference sources, zones that cannot be surveyed, exposures and unresolved items are brought together at their precise locations.

Each limitation is assigned a suitable follow-up measure and investigation status.

Unresolved items receive a specific timing reference to the next construction phase and remain visible in the register until resolved by specialists.

Section-specific and final report

The report identifies which wall sections and foundation points were investigated and with what result.

Limits of conclusions and further measures are stated clearly for site management, the client and the project file.

The attachment structure allows a post or plinth section to be linked to the investigation and construction status at the time, even years later.

Verifiable project file

Maintain point schedules, survey data and reports for each wall section

Long linear projects need a consistent documentation structure. Sources, point identifiers, survey data and handovers are recorded so that later design changes can also be assessed traceably.

01

Initial data register

Site plans, foundation documents, utility data, historical assessments and authority conditions are recorded with their revision and origin.

This keeps the basis of each investigation decision identifiable.

The register also contains the planned decision date so that missing background information is available in good time before the relevant construction section.

02

Surveying and point file

Coordinates, chainage, pile identifiers and investigation status are maintained in an updatable schedule.

Relocated, omitted or additional points receive a clear change note.

Changes in chainage and alignment offsets are explicitly marked in the file, rather than communicated only through drawings.

03

Survey and borehole data

Raw data, evaluation versions, borehole parameters and field logs are assigned to each point or section.

Technical interruptions and quality limitations remain recorded throughout the data chain.

Survey data are retained in their original and processed forms so that later questions about the evaluation process can be answered.

04

Findings and action register

Anomalies, exposures, confirmed findings and subsequent decisions are documented with location, date and type of work.

Unresolved items are immediately identifiable for designers and site management.

The measures history distinguishes technical repeat measurements, exposure, specialist evaluation and final resolution.

05

Section releases for the construction sequence

Handovers describe the stage of investigation reached and the specific working volume covered.

They do not provide conclusions for adjoining or deeper areas and are reassessed when designs change.

A section handover explicitly identifies which special points or edge zones are not yet included in the next working step.

06

Project completion and archiving

Reports, drawings, schedules and handover documents are brought together in a consistent attachment register.

The project file allows each wall section and foundation point to be traced unambiguously to the documented result later.

The archive is structured so that later repair or replacement work can refer back to the documented point reference.

Noise barrier project sequence

From the foundation schedule to investigation and section handover

The sequence is adapted to design maturity, foundation method and construction sections. Investigation, evaluation and handover of results are scheduled before each construction section.

01

Record the project section

The wall alignment, chainage, foundation concept, working width, construction dates and required decision are taken from the current drawings.

02

Bring documents to the same drawing revision

Historical assessments, utility data, surveying, ground investigation documents and existing documentation are checked for spatial agreement.

03

Assess suspected ordnance conditions

Historical indications are related to the wall alignment, pile points, plinth and excavation areas; data gaps are assigned a clear clarification task.

04

Specify investigation geometry

Areas, pile points, boreholes and excavation zones are planned separately according to depth, target object and survey feasibility.

05

Prepare the site

Access, traffic management, utility marking, surveying, instructions and working windows are agreed before field deployment.

06

Carry out surveying

Area or deep investigation is carried out with clear point and section assignments; inaccessible zones are documented.

07

Assess results

Survey data, known installations, anomalies and limitations are checked for technical plausibility against the foundation and construction objective.

08

Hand over the section

The report, point schedule, site plan, outstanding measures and limits of conclusions are prepared as a binding basis for the next construction phase.

Technical foundation planning

What geometries are needed for reliable explosive ordnance investigation

Technical planning must represent the actual installation or excavation volume. A line on a site plan is insufficient where piles, boreholes and foundations have different depths and diameters.

Specify location, depth and construction stage for each pile

For explosive ordnance investigation, the wall is divided into sections with clear chainage references. Each foundation point receives coordinates, an identifier, foundation or pile type, target depth, diameter and proposed installation method. These details define the volume requiring specialist assessment before construction.

Impact driving, vibratory driving and drilling differ in energy input and working geometry. Subsequent equipment positions, trial pits and auxiliary boreholes may also create additional ground interventions. The investigation scope is therefore not determined solely by the pile centre.

Utilities, safety barriers, slopes, drainage and existing foundations affect survey feasibility and drill positioning. The drawing shows which zones are freely accessible, affected by technical interference or accessible only after demolition. Suitable investigation methods and possible access dates are specified for each zone.

For long wall sections, point schedules can be divided by priority and construction phase. The data structure nevertheless remains consistent throughout so that sections can be combined and later changes assessed reliably.

Wall ends, changes in level, doors, culverts and connections to bridges or retaining walls are not treated as standard grid points. Their foundation geometry may differ substantially from the other posts and is therefore recorded separately in the point schedule and survey concept.

For parallel utilities, it must also be checked whether trial trenches, utility exposure or protective measures alter the original working strip. These interventions are coordinated spatially and in time with the explosive ordnance investigation.

01

Chainage and alignment offset

The beginning, end, alignment and any offsets are clearly identified.

A reference to the slope or carriageway alone is insufficient if drawing revisions use different alignments.

02

Point and foundation dimensions

Diameter, length, foundation width and working space determine the investigation geometry.

Socket foundations, anchors and auxiliary boreholes are also considered where they disturb the ground.

03

Target depth and installation method

Drilling, impact-driving or vibratory-driving methods are documented with maximum depth and any possible inclination.

The investigation must cover the subsequent path of the structural element.

04

Utilities and technical interference sources

Known utilities, reinforcement, safety systems and existing piles are recorded by location.

They affect both survey evaluation and the practical drilling of survey boreholes.

05

Accessibility and traffic phase

Working strips, closures, equipment positions and safe access are checked against survey planning.

Inaccessible areas are assigned to a later construction phase or an alternative measure.

06

Change and variation management

Drawing revisions and additional points are checked against existing documentation before construction.

The update records which data can be retained and which points require new investigation.

For special points at structural connections, portals or changes in level, separate investigation is useful where the foundation type or depth differs from the wall's standard system. Installation openings, stair connections and transitions to bridge structures are also recorded as separate foundation and working areas. Their depths, axes and construction phases are incorporated separately into point and section documentation.

Select an investigation

Select investigations for the wall alignment and foundation points

Two people discussing plans at a table beside a vehicle on a construction site.

Link preliminary investigation to the current alignment

Compare existing documents on suspected ordnance and earlier investigations with the wall alignment and lateral working areas. Relocated piles, additional foundations or altered access may affect different areas from those in the original drawing revision.

Compare existing documentation with the current alignment
Person beside a survey instrument on a construction site; a wheeled excavator with drilling equipment stands behind them.

Assess foundation points by depth and installation method

Investigation selection requires point identifiers, locations, foundation dimensions and target depths. Utilities, safety barriers and existing foundations are considered as possible limitations. For each point, it must be clear which volume can be investigated and where further clarification remains necessary.

Assess depth-related investigation
Define the technical scope of services

Which method provides information on which part of the noise barrier

The methods measure different properties and relate to different area or depth volumes. Combining them is useful where each service answers a clearly identified project question.

01

Historical aerial photograph analysis

Establishes whether and where historically suspected explosive ordnance exists along the wall alignment.

It does not detect objects actually present today or replace investigation of foundation points.

02

Magnetometry

Detects ferromagnetic anomalies in accessible areas.

Safety barriers, utilities, vehicles and existing steel components can substantially affect measurements in the road environment.

03

TDEM

Evaluates time-dependent electromagnetic responses from conductive objects and can supplement investigation of suitable subareas.

The target object, ground, depth and electromagnetic environment determine the conclusions achievable.

04

Ground-penetrating radar / GPR

Shows reflections at material and structural boundaries and can depict installations or layer changes under suitable conditions.

A radar reflection does not uniquely identify explosive ordnance.

05

Deep-ground and downhole surveys

Investigates defined point-specific and depth volumes for piles, boreholes and deep foundations.

Coordinates, survey geometry and target depth must match the actual construction.

06

Excavation supervision

Where explosive ordnance detection during construction is technically suitable, each working layer is surveyed and evaluated using technical methods. Controlled removal in layers and supplementary visual inspection then follow; these steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base.

Excavation layers, hold points, authority to issue instructions, communication routes and documentation are specified in the work instruction before work starts. Simply watching the excavator is insufficient. Conclusions apply only to the layers and sections actually investigated.

Working method and quality

Assign investigation results to individual piles and sections

The point schedule, investigation methods and required documentation are specified before work starts. The report shows which foundation volumes were investigated and where questions remain unresolved.

Each investigated point remains identifiable in the results

FONTANA-EOD starts with the wall alignment, foundation type and decision required. The entire route is therefore not treated with one uniform method; each working volume is assessed according to depth, interference conditions and construction phase.

Before field deployment, point schedules, surveying, existing utilities and accessibility are checked. Changes and missing information are clarified with designers and site management before the affected points are investigated.

During the work, survey data, field logs and point identifiers remain linked. Anomalies and technical limitations are identified spatially and translated into a specific subsequent decision.

The conclusion applies to the documented wall section and investigated foundation geometry. It is not transferred to additional points, greater depths or changed methods.

For long wall sections, fixed dates are agreed for exchanging point schedules and investigation results. Designers, surveyors, explosive ordnance surveyors and installers thus receive the same point status on defined dates; later corrections can be limited specifically to individual sections.

A clear task

The alignment, point schedule, depth, method and information required are specified before work starts.

Drawing revision control

Surveying and construction design are related to the same data revision.

Justified methodology

Method selection considers the target object, intervention depth, ground and technical interference.

Locate results on the drawing

Survey data, findings and limitations remain assigned to each section.

Mark unresolved areas

Interference zones and inaccessible areas receive an identifiable follow-up measure.

Hand reports over to site management

The documentation answers the project question for site management and the client.

Prepare the next construction section

Update point schedules and investigation through to foundation work

Assign working windows to individual points

Not every foundation point is accessible at the same time. Link the point schedule with the proposed working windows and construction sequence. This shows which investigations must be completed before drilling, driving or excavation.

Hand over results for each point and wall section

Survey data, the report and construction drawings use the same point identifiers. Unresolved depths and unrecorded edge zones remain assigned to each location. The handover also shows which plinth and utility works were considered alongside the foundation points.

Roles in a noise barrier project

Who maintains the point schedule, investigates and reports changes

The client, designers, surveyors, utility coordinators, contractor and specialist company need the same alignment and point information. Depending on project location, public authorities have different tasks from the privately commissioned specialist service.

Client

Road authority or project promoter

Defines the wall section, project objective, programme and documentation required. Provides existing documents and commissions the necessary specialist services.

Where several work packages are involved, the client ensures consistent chainage and handover rules.

Design

Road, structural and geotechnical design

Translates the project into an alignment, pile and foundation schedule, target depths, working volumes and construction phases.

Design changes are communicated so that their effect on existing survey documentation can be assessed.

Coordination

Surveying and utility management

Maintains coordinates, setting-out, utility routes and current existing-condition data.

Unclear or contradictory locations are clarified before drilling and surveying.

Execution

Civil engineering, specialist foundation and installation contractors

Construct piles, foundations, plinths and associated earthworks to the agreed geometry.

Relocations, additional points or changed installation methods are reported before construction.

Specialist contractor

FONTANA-EOD

Assesses suspected ordnance and documents, plans the commissioned investigation and documents results and limitations.

The specialist service remains tied to the agreed area and depth volume.

Public authorities

KBD, KMBD, KRD and local authorities

In Germany, the ordnance disposal services of the federal states and the locally competent authorities carry out hazard-response and find-management duties. Their involvement is established for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.

The local public order authority and, where applicable, building authority are involved according to their project-specific tasks. Conditions and contacts are assigned to the actual wall section. If ordnance is found, the responsible authorities determine the next steps.

Noise barrier project documents

What work and documentation records are used in practice

The documents shown link wall design, fieldwork and construction. An unambiguous reference to the current foundation and construction section remains essential.

Four people in orange high-visibility vests in front of two excavators on a construction site.
Person with a yellow survey cart on a footpath in front of a hedge.
Identify the project location

Clearly locate the wall section and foundation schedule

Illustrated map of Germany with location markers on a construction site.

Identify the site and applicable requirements

State the project location, road or route, chainage and wall-section identifier. The alignment drawing and point schedule must have the same revision and include lateral working areas. Existing requirements are assigned to their specific section and checked again if the wall is relocated.

Use results correctly

Use point-specific results correctly when designs change

Link the point identifier to location and depth

An unchanged designation alone does not establish that the ground intervention is unchanged. Compare coordinates, level references and foundation data with the investigation report. A relocated or deeper pile may lie outside the volume previously covered.

Check evidence against the intervention

Consider ancillary works separately

Plinth trenches, drainage, cables and installation access routes may lie between or beside foundation points. Check whether their actual working volumes are included in the investigation. A row of investigated pile points is not used as a blanket conclusion for the entire wall corridor.

Explore the technical principles

Technical information

Roadworks and civil engineering: brochure

How can carriageways, bridges and deep excavations be investigated for ordnance? The brochure explains preparation, suitable survey methods and supervision of earthworks.

1 / 8
Roadworks and civil engineering: brochure – page 1

German · 8 pages

Questions about noise barriers

Frequently asked questions about explosive ordnance detection for noise barriers

When should explosive ordnance investigation for a noise barrier begin?

Investigation should begin once the alignment, foundation type and approximate foundation depth are established. At this stage, historical evidence of suspected ordnance, existing utilities, the working strip and construction sections can still be coordinated without substantial redesign. Before drilling, driving or excavation, it must be established which area and depth volume have actually been investigated.

Is an area-based surface survey along the wall alignment sufficient?

This depends on the foundations and survey environment. Area measurements can cover accessible near-surface zones but do not automatically cover deep tubular steel piles, bored piles or individual foundations. For these interventions, it is assessed separately whether the required location and depth have already been adequately investigated and what supplementary work may be needed.

Which records are needed for planning?

Required documents include a site and alignment drawing, chainage, foundation or pile schedule, target depths, installation methods, working width, construction phases, utility and as-built drawings and any existing aerial photograph assessments or information from authorities. For phased construction, priorities and handover dates should also be stated.

Information and requirements from authorities are supplied with their date, complete appendices and geographical scope. In Germany, the competent ordnance disposal service, local public-order authority and, where relevant, building-control authority are identified for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.

How are utilities and existing transport installations taken into account?

Utilities, drainage, sign foundations, safety barriers, cables, bridge components and existing noise barriers affect accessibility and survey feasibility. Known installations are checked on site and on drawings. Zones that cannot be surveyed reliably receive a clearly identified follow-up measure instead of a blanket assessment.

When is ordnance specialist supervision of excavation useful?

For plinths, cable trenches or demolition sections, the technical suitability of explosive ordnance detection during construction is assessed. Each working layer is surveyed and evaluated using technical methods before controlled removal in layers with supplementary visual inspection. The steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base. Excavation layers, hold points, lines of instruction and documentation are established before work starts. Necessary investigations and protective measures are also planned before ground disturbance during demolition. Whether deep pile points have been adequately investigated is assessed separately.

What does the documentation for site management contain?

The documentation links the wall alignment, chainage, foundation or pile identifiers, areas and depths investigated, methods used, interference zones, findings and outstanding measures. It must show which foundation points were assessed for the planned working volume and where supplementary work remains necessary.

What factors affect effort and cost?

Relevant factors are wall length, number and depth of foundation points, foundation method, accessibility, traffic management, utility density, surface condition, interference conditions, construction windows, required surveying and the scope of data checks and reporting. Reliable costing therefore requires a current drawing and ground-intervention reference.

What should you do if a suspicious object is found?

Stop work immediately in the affected area. Do not touch, move or expose the object further. Leave the danger area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency contact procedure. Then inform site management.

Enquire about a noise barrier

We need these documents for your noise barrier

An initial enquiry should show where the wall runs, which foundations are proposed and by what date the documentation is needed.

Location, alignment and construction section

Provide the project address, site plan, chainage, wall alignment, land parcels, working strip and construction-section priorities.

Where several design options exist, identify which geometry is to be the binding basis for investigation.

Foundations and ground intervention

A pile or foundation schedule, coordinates, diameters, target depths, installation methods and plinth and excavation dimensions are required.

Auxiliary boreholes, anchors, utility trenches and assembly areas are added where they disturb the ground.

Existing conditions, dates and documents

Include utility drawings, historical assessments, ground investigation data, existing foundations, traffic phases, construction dates and existing authority conditions.

Even incomplete documents show which background information still needs to be obtained before tendering or construction.

For initial specialist assessment

A site plan, wall alignment, foundation type, maximum depth, number of points, planned period and existing indications of suspected ordnance are often sufficient for an initial assessment. FONTANA-EOD then identifies the information still required and the technically appropriate service scope.

For long or staged projects, the work can be organised by construction section and decision date. The data structure remains consistent along the entire wall alignment.

It is also helpful to state whether foundation and installation work will be carried out within the same work package or by separate contractors. This creates different handover points for investigated areas, foundation points and unresolved ancillary zones.

Wall alignment

Chainage, working strip, construction sections and drawing revision.

Foundation points

Coordinates, type, diameter, target depth and installation method.

Existing surroundings

Utilities, safety barriers, slopes, foundations and access.

Documentation objective

Document for design, procurement, site management or the project file.

Project enquiry

Have your project assessed

Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.

FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.