Project pathway
The quickest route to the right decision.
Before a pumping station is built, the excavation, foundations, pressure pipeline and temporary arrangements are checked against existing explosive ordnance documents. FONTANA-EOD plans suitable investigations according to structure geometry, depth, existing surroundings and operational phase. Send structure and pipeline plans, sections, depths and alteration and bypass phases so that services and documentation can be defined before the respective ground interventions.
Assign the shaft, building and connections.
Define the pipeline axis, chambers and crossings.
Coordinate alterations, bypass arrangements and documentation.
Before a pumping station is newly built or altered, investigation needs are clarified using existing indications of a suspected hazard and planned ground interventions. The pumping station excavation, shafts, foundations and pressure pipeline axis are considered by position, depth and construction method. Existing utilities, pumping equipment and structures also determine when an area is accessible and which investigation method may suit it. The documentation distinguishes the structural and pipeline areas addressed and identifies unresolved zones and the next investigation steps.
The pumping station and pressure pipeline connect a compact, often deep plant area with a linear pipeline structure. The shaft, building, foundations, pipe trench, valves and crossings differ in area, depth and alterations from technical installations.
The explosive ordnance investigation therefore follows the specific construction and operational condition. For each volume of ground affected, existing investigations and outstanding tasks are documented.
For refurbishment or replacement construction, existing plant, temporary arrangements, demolition and new construction are documented separately in space and time.

For wet wells and wet or dry shafts, intended depths are taken from layouts and sections. Excavation, retaining structures, foundations, base and working space determine the explosive ordnance investigation geometry.
Near-surface surveys can cover clear peripheral areas but do not automatically address the deeper shaft and retaining structure volume.
Investigate the shaft and depth volume
Machinery rooms, operations buildings, transformer or switchgear areas, pipe supports and equipment need foundations, ground slabs and utility connections.
The investigation relates to the excavation, foundation depth, piles where applicable and transitions to pipelines and shafts.
Investigate building and foundation areas
The pressure pipeline forms a linear working corridor with changing depths, bends, high and low points and different surfaces and properties.
The axis, working width, retaining structures, soil storage and construction section are documented by chainage so that the investigation covers the actual earthworks volume.
Investigate the pressure pipeline section
Chambers and technical points create additional deeper areas outside the standard trench. Their positions, depths and construction methods may change during the project.
Each point receives its own object identifier and is linked to the adjoining pipeline section without losing its distinct geometry.
Assign valve points and documentation
Roads, watercourses, railway lines or existing utilities may require open-cut or trenchless crossings. Launch and reception pits, drilling paths and pipeline transitions are separate investigation volumes.
The methodology is coordinated with pits, depth alignment, possible positional deviations and technical sources of interference.
Investigate crossing and drilling areas
During renewal, old plant, temporary pumping arrangements, bypass pipelines, demolition and new construction must be coordinated in time. Parts of the volume of ground affected may become accessible only after decommissioning or demolition.
These construction conditions receive their own investigation dates and handover points so that unresolved areas are not mistakenly treated as addressed.
Document investigation status and handovers for each construction phasePumping station projects develop from site and route options through structure and pipeline design to alterations during ongoing operations. The investigation needed for the upcoming decision is assessed.
Existing information on the structure, pipeline section, depth and construction condition is compiled for this purpose.
During the early phase, it is assessed whether the pumping station location, pressure pipeline options and planned construction areas affect historical suspected areas or zones with difficult access.
The assessment helps integrate ground investigations and technical investigations into the programme.
It does not yet establish the present-day position of individual objects.
Assess the site and route historicallyDepth, diameter, retaining structures, foundations and working space describe the pumping station area to be investigated.
Boreholes, piles, sheet piles or shaft axes are planned with point and depth references.
Peripheral areas and pipeline connections are added as separate subareas.
Investigate the shaft and excavation support at depthThe pipeline axis, standard cross-section, bends, chambers, valves, crossings and transitions are described section by section.
Investigation geometry follows the entire trench and excavation volume, not just the pipe axis.
For different depths or trenchless construction, it is assessed which methods are suitable and which documentation they can provide.
Coordinate pipeline and special pointsHistorical assessment, area survey, deep-ground investigation, excavation supervision and possible work on findings are described as different services.
Areas, point quantities, depths, construction conditions, access and documentation duties are assigned unambiguously.
Tenders and later variations thus remain technically traceable.
Structure the specification and documentationFor existing plant, temporary arrangements, bypass pipelines, decommissioning and demolition steps can change access.
Each construction condition is checked against the existing investigation. For inaccessible zones, later investigation timings and suitable supplementary methods are assessed.
Operational permits to work and specialist investigation status remain separate.
Select investigation for the individual construction conditionsA geophysical anomaly may be caused by a utility, foundation remnant, scrap metal or an object relevant to explosive ordnance.
Further work is prepared according to position, depth, existing surroundings and planned intervention.
For a suspicious object, stop work immediately, keep a safe distance and notify the police immediately on 110 in Germany; outside Germany, the local emergency reporting procedure applies.
Document findings and further workThe pumping station site and pipeline route are maintained in the same project file but are not treated with the same investigation geometry. For deep structures, pipe trenches and individual valve points, the investigations needed are determined separately using the planned interventions and existing information.
For each area, the conclusion describes the status reached and the measure still required before the next construction section.
Initial situation: The property and initial plant location are defined; excavation and foundations have not yet been finalised.
Technical step: Historical evidence supporting a suspected hazard and existing site information are assessed and related to the intended plant area.
Documentation objective: Designers can identify which subareas and deep interventions require further technical investigation.
Have the suspected hazard at the site assessed by specialistsInitial situation: The excavation, shaft axis, retaining structures and design depth are defined.
Technical step: Near-surface areas and deep points or retaining structure axes are addressed separately using suitable methods.
Documentation objective: The full documented volume of ground receives a traceable status before shaft construction.
Investigate the shaft and retaining structure axesInitial situation: The pipeline axis, trench width and depth are known; the area is accessible.
Technical step: A suitable area survey method is selected according to the target object, ground conditions and surface.
Documentation objective: Survey coverage, unusual findings and unresolved zones are documented by chainage.
Survey the pressure pipeline sectionInitial situation: The old structure, steel, utilities and operations prevent a complete preliminary investigation.
Technical step: freely accessible areas are investigated in advance. For further zones, suitable investigations and possible dates before or after individual demolition steps are defined. Necessary investigations and protective measures are planned before preparatory ground interventions.
Documentation objective: Each construction condition clearly shows the volumes addressed and those still unresolved.
Determine suitable methods before and after demolitionInitial situation: The launch and reception pits are connected by a deep drilling or jacking path.
Technical step: Pits, starting points and depth alignment are treated as separate investigation geometries.
Documentation objective: The documentation makes clear which conclusion applies to the pits and which to the crossing volume.
Investigate the crossing volume with reference to depthInitial situation: A survey or historical information indicates further investigation needs within the planned volume of ground affected.
Technical step: The anomaly, existing infrastructure, depth and subsequent construction method are assessed together and further work is organised.
Documentation objective: Findings, handover and remaining limitations are unambiguously assigned to the structure or pipeline section.
Record findings status and remaining working limitsThe pumping station and pressure pipeline need a common but differentiated project file. Structure areas, deep points, pipeline sections and special structures must remain clearly assigned.
For alterations during operations, it must also remain clear to which demolition or new construction condition a conclusion applies.
The address, land parcel, coordinate system, pumping station position, pipeline axis, chainage and current plan revision establish the spatial reference.
Existing structures, demolition, new construction and temporary arrangements are identified separately.
The shaft, excavation, retaining structures, piles, foundations, buildings and pipeline connections are documented by area and depth.
The documentation shows which geometry was actually addressed.
Aerial photograph assessments, authority information, historical reports, existing utilities, ground investigation data and known findings are brought together.
The available sources and gaps in data remain distinguishable from survey results.
Survey areas, drilling points, depths, lines, construction conditions, surface conditions and technical sources of interference are recorded traceably.
Raw data, evaluation and the site plan use the same structure and chainage identifiers.
Existing plant, steel, utilities, lack of access or changed construction phases can limit investigation.
For these zones, position and construction condition are recorded. The suitable supplementary investigation and when it can take place are clarified separately.
The report and plans bring together areas, points and depths addressed, findings, limitations and subsequent decisions.
Design changes are checked before the existing status is reused.
The dossier maintains historical assessment, technical investigation, construction conditions and follow-up measures in a common structure. The operator and site management can thus distinguish the plant area from the pipeline section while retaining an overview of overall status.
For refurbishment, it remains clear which conclusion applies to existing plant, temporary arrangements, demolition or new construction.
The pumping station, buildings, shafts, foundations, pipeline sections, valves and crossings are maintained in a consistent object structure.
The plan version and revision show which geometry formed the basis of each investigation.
Suspected areas, previous uses and known information on finds are related to the plant area and pipeline corridor.
Historical conclusions and technical survey results remain separately traceable.
Areas, points, depths, lines and field conditions are stored with geographical references.
The datasets can be linked to excavation, retaining structure and pipeline design.
Anomalies, exposure work, technical interfering objects and actual finds receive an updatable status.
Outstanding points are recorded with follow-up measures and construction phase references.
The operator, designers, site management, HSE, plant contractors, civil engineering teams and competent authorities receive documents relevant to their roles.
Handovers identify the construction condition, unresolved volume of ground and next decision required.
Reports, site plans, point and section lists and records are brought together for long-term use. Following actual exposure or clearance work, the corresponding findings and clearance records are included.
Additional chambers, pipeline relocations or changed alteration phases are documented as supplementary work.
The work follows design maturity and construction condition. Early clarification of suspected hazards supports site and route planning; as detail increases, technical investigation relates to the shaft, excavation, foundations and pipeline sections.
For alterations to existing plant, later access and operational handovers are considered during investigation planning.
New construction, replacement construction or refurbishment, the pumping station location, pressure pipeline sections, construction phases and decision needed are described.
Existing plant and planned temporary arrangements remain separate from the new construction geometry.
Historical assessments, authority guidance, historical plans, existing utilities, ground investigation data and earlier survey reports are compared spatially.
Missing or contradictory information is documented as outstanding project points.
The shaft, building, excavation, foundations, retaining structures, pipe trench, valve points and crossings are recorded by area and depth.
This geometry provides the basis for procurement and fieldwork planning.
The target object, ground conditions, surface, alterations from technical installations, access and required depth determine the appropriate combination.
For existing and demolition areas, it is assessed which supplementary methods are suitable and under which construction condition they can be used.
Operational permissions, temporary arrangements, protection zones, surveying, dewatering, equipment and contacts are clarified before mobilisation.
The sequence is linked to civil engineering, plant construction and pipeline installation.
The agreed area-specific, depth-related or construction-stage investigations are carried out within the documented structure and route geometry.
Deviations and inaccessible areas are recorded immediately.
Survey values, anomalies, exposure work and known existing objects are checked for plausibility against the suspected hazard and construction planning.
For unresolved zones, information still needed and suitable further investigations are identified.
The report, plans, point lists, section status and limitations are prepared for the operator and site management.
New construction conditions, pipeline changes or additional structures trigger a targeted comparison.
The volume of ground affected by explosive ordnance investigation does not follow only the pumping station property or pipeline axis. The shaft, excavation, retaining structures, building, pipe trench, valve points and crossings are recorded separately.
In the shared site plan, the areas, depths and investigation limits of the structure and pipeline are stated separately.
The pumping station forms a concentrated plant area, partly at considerable depth. The pressure pipeline runs linearly and may cross changing ground, surface and existing infrastructure conditions over long distances.
For the shaft and excavation, the base, retaining structures, foundations and working space are described. For the pipeline, the axis, working width, trench depth, chambers, bends and crossings are added.
Existing buildings, utilities, valves and steel components can obscure individual survey methods. Planning therefore distinguishes clear survey areas, technically restricted areas and zones accessible only after demolition.
The final plan shows the volume actually addressed for each structural component and route section. Later alterations or positional changes can thus be checked against the existing status in a targeted way.
Deep shaft structures are recorded with the axis, diameter, base, retaining structures, foundations and working space.
The investigation must cover the full later intervention; a near-surface area conclusion is not automatically sufficient.
Slopes, sheet pile axes, bored piles, anchors or bracing may extend considerably beyond the shaft itself.
Each retaining element is recorded as its own point- or line-related volume using the location reference.
Machinery buildings, technical rooms, transformers, pipe bridges and equipment create further area and point foundations.
Their excavations are linked to pipeline connections and the pumping station shaft without mixing their different depths.
The pressure pipeline is described with its axis, working width, depth, bends, high and low points and chambers.
Valve and drain points receive their own identifiers and are assigned to the appropriate pipeline section.
Old utilities, steel, pumping equipment and foundations can restrict survey feasibility. Temporary pipelines also change access and the construction sequence.
The investigation is linked to defined operational and demolition conditions; unresolved zones remain identifiable until then.
Trenchless crossings, inverted siphons or relocated pipeline axes may reach deep volumes beyond the open trench.
Before execution, new alignments are compared with the existing investigation and supplementary investigation provided where needed.

For the pumping station excavation, position, excavation depth, foundations and intended retaining structures are stated. Dewatering, connection pits and temporary working areas are included where ground interventions are planned. This geometry is compared with existing investigation results.
Check structure geometry against existing documentation
Pumping equipment, existing utilities and structural installations can limit access and survey conditions. Suitable methods are selected separately for the pipeline alignment and deep structures. Areas accessible only later are recorded with their intended investigation timing.
Select methods according to operations and pipeline alignmentHistorical assessment, geophysics, deep-ground survey and work during construction answer different questions. Selection follows shaft depth, pipeline alignment, existing surroundings and documentation needed.
A combination is useful where it covers clearly defined subvolumes and the results are brought together in a common project file.
Relates historical sources and possible suspected areas to the pumping station site and pipeline corridor.
It does not replace a technical assessment of present-day objects in the ground.
Can detect ferromagnetic anomalies on clear plant and route areas.
Buildings, steel, utilities, vehicles and scrap metal content can limit evaluation within existing sites.
Detects time-dependent electromagnetic responses from conductive objects and can supplement certain area-specific investigation questions.
Existing utilities, ground conductivity and required depth are considered before deployment.
Can show changes in structure and material, utilities or discrete reflections on suitable surfaces.
A reflection does not unambiguously identify explosive ordnance and must be checked against existing infrastructure and suspected hazard data.
Investigates defined shaft, pile, retaining structure and drilling points at the required depth.
Borehole geometry, surveyed interval and subsequent construction method must align.
Where explosive ordnance detection during construction is technically suitable, each working layer is surveyed and evaluated using technical methods. Controlled removal in layers and supplementary visual inspection then follow; these steps are repeated down to the agreed excavation base.
Excavation layers, stopping points, authority to give instructions, communication procedures, documentation and the volume of ground affected are defined in the work instruction before work begins.
The investigation documents distinguish the pumping station, pipeline route and individual valve points. All results are assigned to the associated plan version and construction condition.
Refurbishment adds operational transitions, temporary arrangements and demolition conditions. Before fieldwork, it is clarified which areas are accessible under each construction condition.
FONTANA-EOD starts by asking which conclusion is needed for the shaft, excavation, building, pipeline section or crossing. The service is not derived from a general property assessment.
Method selection considers the historical suspected hazard, target object, depth, ground conditions, surface and alterations from technical installations. Existing plant and utilities are included in planning as actual survey and access limitations.
During execution, structure and route data remain linked to the current plan version. Changes to shaft geometry, retaining structures or pipeline alignment are assessed by specialists before ground intervention.
Unusual findings are communicated by component or chainage. Survey anomaly, technical interfering object and an actual find remain distinguishable so that site management and competent authorities can act unambiguously.
The final report identifies the work status reached and its limitations. The next construction or operational transition can thus be prepared without including uninvestigated zones.
For handover to operations, unresolved investigation areas, remaining construction conditions and follow-up measures not yet carried out are listed separately. The documentation thus remains usable after partial commissioning or handover of individual pipeline sections.
The shaft, building, foundations, pipeline and special points are described separately.
Methods follow depth, ground conditions, existing surroundings and the conclusion actually needed.
Temporary arrangements, access, decommissioning and parallel trades are incorporated into the sequence.
Survey areas, points, findings and limitations remain assigned to the plan version and object identifier.
New construction conditions and pipeline changes are checked against the existing status.
The documents identify unresolved investigation areas and decisions needed before the next construction section.
For alterations, it is recorded which areas are accessible before demolition and which can be investigated only after certain installations are removed. Dates are coordinated with site management and the operator so that outstanding investigations remain included in the construction sequence. Necessary investigations and protective measures are planned before ground interventions during demolition or preparation of access.
The shaft structure, connection pits and pressure pipeline sections receive unambiguous identifiers. The handover describes areas and depths addressed and areas still unresolved. The current plan version shows to which construction phase the results belong.
The pumping station and pressure pipeline bring together the operator, designers, civil engineering teams, plant contractors, HSE, the specialist company and competent authorities. Before execution, it is defined who reports design changes, tracks unresolved areas and receives results.
Specialist investigation work, operational permission and official decisions on a find remain identifiable as separate steps.
Define the supply or drainage task, location, pipeline network, construction phases and documentation needed.
They provide existing as-built, operational and suspected hazard documents and commission the specialist services required.
Translate the project into the shaft, excavation, foundations, building, pipeline axis, valve points and crossings.
Design changes are documented so that their effects on areas already addressed can be checked.
Coordinate decommissioning, bypass arrangements, access, protection zones, dewatering, instruction and reporting procedures.
Their requirements determine when and under which conditions existing and demolition zones are accessible.
Construct the shaft, excavation, retaining structures, foundations, pipe trench, crossings and valves within the agreed geometry.
Different positions, greater depths or changed construction methods are coordinated with designers and the specialist company before ground intervention.
Assesses the suspected hazard and documents, develops the commissioned approach and records results and limitations.
The work relates to the structure, pipeline section, construction condition and specific project decision.
In Germany, the ordnance disposal services of the federal states and the locally competent authorities carry out hazard-response and find-management duties. Their involvement is established for the project location; outside Germany, local responsibilities apply.
The local public order authority and, where applicable, building control are involved according to their project-specific responsibilities. Conditions and contacts are assigned to the pumping station location and actual pipeline sections; reporting procedures are defined before work begins.
If an unexpected suspicious object is found, notify the police immediately on 110 in Germany; outside Germany, the local emergency reporting procedure applies. The competent authorities determine the next steps.
The activity, project location, excavation depth, operational condition and utility environment determine organisational requirements. Qualifications, risk assessment and documentation are defined in detail for the structure and route.
Operational rules, dewatering, retaining structure design and civil engineering planning supplement explosive ordnance investigation work without replacing its specialist limitations.
In Germany, § 7 SprengG concerns the commercial authorisation for activities requiring authorisation; § 20 SprengG concerns the certificate of competence of responsible persons. Under § 1b SprengG, searching for found munitions also counts as handling them. The requirements applicable to the project depend on the activity actually commissioned and the allocation of responsibilities.
The risk assessment connects deep excavations, shaft construction, retaining structures, dewatering, pipeline construction, existing plant, heavy equipment, escape routes and communication with the intended explosive ordnance work.
DGUV Information 201-027 supports risk assessment and protective measures for explosive ordnance clearance work. The Baufachlichen Richtlinien Kampfmittelräumung contain requirements for historical and technical investigation, clearance concepts, procurement and documentation within their defined scope of federal responsibilities. Their application to the specific pumping station and pressure pipeline project is clarified separately.
A planned preliminary assessment follows different procedures from an actual find. If an unexpected suspicious object is found, stop work in the affected area immediately. Do not touch, move or further expose the object. Leave the danger area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting procedure. The competent authorities determine the next steps. Then inform site management and the operator.
Technical commissioning, contractual acceptance, operational permission and official decisions on a find are maintained separately. The documents and decisions needed are defined for each transition.
The First Ordinance to the Explosives Act (1. SprengV) includes requirements concerning specialist competence and state-recognised training courses. For pumping stations and pressure pipelines, the required qualifications are related to the specific investigation or clearance assignment.
DGUV Rule 113-003 concerns the dismantling or destruction of explosives or corresponding objects and also includes the disposal of found munitions. It applies according to this field of activity; it does not replace a risk assessment specific to the planned ground intervention.
The company, responsible personnel and scope of responsibility must suit the actual service.
The shaft, retaining structures, dewatering, equipment, utilities, protection zones and reporting procedures are assessed together.
The structure, route, points, depths, quality control and final documents are defined before procurement.
Site management, the operator, HSE and competent authorities receive an agreed communication procedure.
Structure geometry, pipeline sections, point quantities, depths, access, qualifications and data formats are described comparably.
Provisional items receive clear triggers.
The plan version, surveying, retaining structures, dewatering, existing utilities, instruction and contacts are checked against each other.
Changes are incorporated into the task before work begins.
Stop work immediately, do not touch, move or further expose the object, leave the immediate area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, the local emergency reporting procedure applies.
Then inform site management and the operator. Resumption of work follows the instructions of the competent authorities.
The results connect historical evidence, technical investigation, construction conditions and operational transitions. Unambiguous assignment to the structure, pipeline section, plan version and depth is decisive.
The plan connects structure areas, pipeline sections, crossings and current project stages.
Assess the pumping station and pressure pipeline within the utility project
Historical sources support the decision on which areas and depths need further technical investigation.
Assess historical site and route indications
For deep interventions, the depth volume actually covered is documented. A general area figure alone is insufficient.
Investigate shafts and retaining structures with reference to depth
Where explosive ordnance detection during construction is suitable, investigated excavation layers and unresolved areas are documented.
Arrange specialist supervision of excavation and construction phases
The documentation connects the circumstances of the find and technical decision on subsequent steps with the affected volume of ground.
Document findings and subsequent decisions
The operator and site management can trace the status of the pumping station and pressure pipeline separately and together.
Document the structure and route file

Depending on the construction section, pumping station and pressure pipeline projects need historical clarification of suspected hazards, area or deep-ground surveys, controlled excavation or work on findings. The structure, pipeline and follow-up measures are each related to the appropriate scope of services.
For multi-phase measures, the next technical step is tied to the immediately upcoming construction or operational transition. Unresolved investigation areas, necessary follow-up measures and handover points thus remain clear to project participants.
Plan ordnance assessments for transport, utility, energy and other infrastructure projects according to their ground interventions.
Compare other project types
Distinguish utility corridors, crossings, foundations and installation areas by construction method and intervention depth.
View other pipeline projects
Clarify the basis for suspicion and affected plant or route areas before technical investigation.
Determine the historical suspected hazard
Prepare deep shaft, pile, retaining structure and crossing points with their own investigation geometries.
Investigate deep structural areas
Establish the suitability and sequence of construction-phase ordnance surveying for remaining excavation areas.
Plan excavation and demolition in phases
Coordinate recovery of confirmed ordnance with the permitted activities and local responsibilities.
Clarify the findings and recovery process
Coordinate the specification, structure status, pipeline sections, quality control and final documents.
Prepare procurement and the project file
Clarify the project location and local responsibilities for planning, conditions and communication about finds.
Clarify regional responsibilities
State the project location, plant designation, pipeline chainage and affected land parcels. As-built plans and new construction design must show their respective versions. Existing requirements are assigned to the pumping station site and individual pipeline sections.
A deeper excavation or changed foundation may extend beyond the documented investigation volume. Compare the current depth and actual volume of ground affected with existing results and clarify additional investigation needs before ground intervention.
Check evidence against the interventionRelocated pressure pipeline axes or additional valve structures may affect different areas. Assign these changes to the plan version and section so that site management and the operator can trace the work status.
Explore the technical principlesTechnical information
Utility routes, substations and energy installations place different demands on ordnance assessment. The brochure shows the design information needed and how investigation, construction sequence and documentation fit together.

For the specific service, structure geometry, shaft depth, pipeline section, existing condition and documentation needed remain decisive.
Specialist assessment should take place once the pumping station location, pipeline axis and main structures are known. Before ground investigation boreholes, chamber or excavation works, pipe trenches, inverted siphons, pipe jacking or construction of valve structures, the suspected hazard and specific intervention volume must be clarified.
The wet well or shaft, machinery and operations building, inlet and outlet pipelines, pressure pipeline connection, valves, power and control cables, drainage, access and temporary working areas may have different depths and construction conditions. Each area therefore receives its own investigation geometry.
No. The pumping station and pressure pipeline affect different volumes of ground. The pipeline includes a linear corridor and chambers, bends, crossings and, where applicable, special structures. Both areas are linked through the same project file but investigated separately in technical terms.
Deep excavations, piles, sheet piles, bored piles or shaft axes need investigation that considers the full volume of ground affected by later work. For the planned interventions, it is assessed which method can cover the required volume to the intended depth. A near-surface survey covers only the area actually investigated.
Existing buildings, steel, valves, utilities, cables and old foundations can strongly influence geophysical methods. Investigation work is therefore linked to demolition, alteration and new construction conditions. Zones accessible only later remain documented as unresolved until the planned supplementary investigation. Necessary investigations and protective measures are planned before the ground interventions involved in demolition.
Required documents include a site plan and land parcel, pumping station layouts and sections, excavation or shaft design, pipeline axis with chainage, standard cross-sections, valve and chamber locations, crossings, ground investigation data, existing utilities, construction phases, historical assessments and authority guidance. Authority information and conditions should be supplied with their dates, complete attachments and geographical scope.
Influencing factors include the size and depth of the pumping station, foundation and retaining structure methods, pressure pipeline length and depth, number of chambers and crossings, access, ground and surface conditions, existing infrastructure, methods needed, construction conditions, surveying and extent of documentation.
If an unexpected suspicious object is found, stop work in the affected area immediately. Do not touch, move or further expose the object. Leave the danger area and keep others away without putting yourself at risk. In Germany, notify the police immediately on 110; outside Germany, use the local emergency reporting procedure. The competent authorities determine the next steps. Then inform site management and the operator.
An initial enquiry can be made during options appraisal or outline design. The pumping station site, pipeline alignment, main depths and next project decision needed should be identifiable.
Incomplete documents can also be reviewed. They show which design or existing site information still needs clarification before the specification is prepared.
Send the address, land parcel, site plan, pumping station layout, sections, coordinate system and current plan revision.
Mark existing plant, demolition, temporary arrangements, new construction and intended construction phases.
Where options exist, the plant design to be used for the assessment should be unambiguous.
Describe the wet well, excavation, retaining structures, piles, foundations, buildings and utility connections with design depths.
Include the pipeline axis, standard cross-section, chambers, valve points, crossings and special structures.
Deep points should be supplied as a list with coordinates.
Attach existing utility, plant and cable plans, historical assessments, authority documents, ground investigation data and earlier survey reports.
State operational conditions, bypass arrangements, dewatering, access, protection zones and construction time windows.
Describe whether the document is needed for planning, procurement, operations, site management or the project file.
A site plan, pumping station layout, shaft depth, pipeline axis, standard cross-section, construction phases and existing suspected hazard documents often suffice for an initial assessment.
Using your documents, FONTANA-EOD assesses which investigations are needed for each structure and pipeline area and what information is still missing.
For reliable pricing, areas, point quantities, route lengths, depths, access, data formats and documentation to be provided are refined.
For replacement construction, the planned changeover dates, temporary pumping arrangements and sequence of demolition and new construction must also be stated. This information determines when individual areas are actually accessible and which documentation is needed before each operational changeover.
For operations and maintenance, the intended structure of subsequent as-built documentation also matters. Object identifiers, the coordinate system, pipeline chainage, data formats and handover to the asset register or document management system influence the structure of field and final records. Where the pumping station and pressure pipeline are delivered under separate construction contracts, common handover points and consistent naming should be defined before the contracts are awarded.
Shaft, excavation, retaining structures, building, foundations and utility connections.
Route axis, chainage, chambers, valves, crossings and depths.
Existing plant, bypass arrangements, demolition, dewatering, access and time windows.
Document for planning, procurement, the operator, site management or the project file.
Whether historical aerial photograph analysis, explosive ordnance surveying, surface surveying using GPR, magnetometry or TDEM, deep-ground surveys, downhole surveys, excavation supervision, area clearance or ordnance recovery is needed depends on the location, ground disturbance, depth, ground and existing documents. An early ordnance assessment provides clarity for tendering, programming, occupational safety and construction.
FONTANA-EOD combines its Section 7 SprengG licence, specialists holding Section 20 SprengG certificates of competence, suitable survey and clearance methods, and traceable documentation. Send the site plan, depth of ground disturbance, construction phase and existing documents for an initial technical assessment.